scholarly journals The First Case of Primary Cardiac Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Type, Successfully Treated with EPOCH-R

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5418-5418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherise Chantell Rogers ◽  
Owen A. O'Connor ◽  
Glen Granati ◽  
Kavitha Yaddanapudi

Abstract Introduction: Primary cardiac lymphomas are rare non-Hodgkin lymphomas and account for less than 1% of intrinsic cardiac tumors and extranodal Non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Patients can present with a variety of manifestations including heart failure, chest pain, dyspnea, arrhythmias, and tamponade. Presently, there are no formal established guidelines for treatment of primary cardiac lymphomas. Presentation: This is a case of a 72-year-old white man with past medical history significant for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and known pulmonary, renal, and cutaneous sarcoidosis who presented with palpitations, dyspnea on exertion and lightheadedness for two-weeks. He was evaluated by his cardiologist who recommended an elective atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Prior to the planned procedure a transesophageal echocardiogram was performed which revealed a large tissue density within the pericardial space, adjacent to the free wall of the right ventricle and right atrium, and invading the myocardium with extension through the interatrial septum (Figure 1). The RFA was aborted and the patient was admitted for further evaluation of the new cardiac mass, initially suspected to be cardiac sarcoidosis. Subsequent work up included a cardiac MRI, which displayed a dense 7.5 cm by 3.5 cm mass involving the right ventricle and right atrium, wrapping around the great vessels. Right heart cardiac catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy was performed which revealed clusters of large atypical B lymphoid cells with the following immunophenotype: CD30+, CD79a+, Pax5+, Alk 1-, CD138-, CD 10-, Bcl 2-, Bcl 6-, CD45-, focally CD20+, Ki67: 80-90% (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). His PET-CT demonstrated absence of extracardiac lesions, confirming the diagnosis of primary cardiac lymphoma (PCL) (Figure 3). The patient began treatment with a EPOCH-R (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) modified chemotherapy based regimen which consisted of a pre-phase treatment with dexamethasone 12 mg once daily for four days, a cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 over five days and etoposide 50 mg/m2 for three days. Doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were initiated at lower doses and titrated upward to reach the target dose. This strategy was invoked based upon prior experiences and studies that suggest that a modest pre-phase cytoreduction reduces the risk of cardiac perforation. Rituximab was given on day six. He was also given granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF). Our patient was observed closely in the cardiac intensive care unit throughout the duration of chemotherapy due to the high risk of fatal arrhythmia, tamponade, perforation and heart failure. Interim restaging, confirmed complete remission of the intracardiac mass. His post chemotherapy TTE demonstrated a slight reduction in ejection fraction (Figure 1). He received a total of three cycles of EPOCH-R and remained hemodynamically stable within the hospital. No further chemotherapy was given due to a decline in the patient's performance status. Conclusion: This is the first documented case of primary cardiac diffuse large B cell lymphoma successfully treated with EPOCH-R consisting of a modest pre-phase cytoreduction with steroids, cyclophosphamide and etoposide. The high area under the curve of doxorubicin in this setting is far less cardiotoxic. This regimen reduces the risk of cardiac perforation in patients with relatively normal ejection fractions. Disclosures O'Connor: Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilla Prenek ◽  
Klára Csupor ◽  
Péter Beszterczán ◽  
Krisztina Boros ◽  
Erika Kardos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiac tumors are very uncommon compared to other cardiac diseases. Their clinical symptoms can vary from absent to non-specific. The most common symptoms are arrhythmias, blood flow obstruction due to valvular dysfunction, shortness of breath, systemic embolization, and accumulation of pericardial fluid. Hereby, we describe a very rare case of a diffuse large B cell lymphoma patient who presented with the symptoms and signs of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but the patient’s complaints were caused by his intramyocardial lymphoma metastasis. Case presentation Forty-eight-year-old diffuse large B cell lymphoma patient was admitted to our emergency department with chest pain, effort dyspnea, and fever. The patient had normal blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation, sinus tachycardia, fever, crackles over the left lower lobe, novum incomplete right bundle branch block with Q waves and minor ST alterations, elevated C-reactive protein, high-sensitivity troponin-T, and d-dimer levels. Chest X-ray revealed consolidation on the left side and enlarged heart. Bed side transthoracic echocardiography showed inferior akinesis with pericardial fluid. Coronary angiography showed no occlusion or significant stenosis. Chest computed tomography demonstrated the progression of his lymphoma in the myocardium. He was admitted to the Department of Hematology for immediate chemotherapy and he reached complete metabolic remission, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Unfortunately, about 9 months later, he developed bone marrow deficiency consequently severe sepsis, septic shock, and multiple organ failure what he did not survive. Conclusions Our case demonstrates a very rare manifestation of a heart metastasis. ACS is an unusual symptom of cardiac tumors. But our patient’s intramyocardial lymphoma in the right atrium and ventricle externally compressed the right coronary artery and damaged the heart tissue, causing the patient’s symptoms which imitated ACS. Fortunately, the quick diagnostics and immediate aggressive chemotherapy provided the patient’s remission and suitability to further treatment.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110351
Author(s):  
Atakan Tekinalp ◽  
Taha U Kars ◽  
Hatice Z Dikici ◽  
Pınar D Yılmaz ◽  
Sinan Demircioğlu ◽  
...  

Introduction Cardiac involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a rare entity in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Symptoms are usually related to heart failure. Patients who are severely symptomatic due to cardiac mass could be considered treatment as soon as possible. In this report, we present a patient diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with cardiac involvement. Case Report A 61-year-old female patient was admitted to our unit with gastric biopsy diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Computerized tomography of the chest and positron emission tomography/computed tomography demonstrated a neoplastic mass in the intra-atrial septum extended to inferior vena cava (5 × 4 cm in size and standardized uptake value maximum 24.6). She was in stage III and in the high-risk group. Because of pronounced heart failure findings associated with the mass-specific chemotherapy was planned early. Management & Outcome Although a fraction of ejection was 60% by echocardiography before the treatment, she had a cardiac risk for doxorubicin due to being over 60 years old and hypertension. Complete remission was achieved after three cycles of rituximab–cyclophosphamide–doxorubicin–vincristine and methylprednisolone protocol including doxorubicin. Treatment was completed with six cycles and she was followed up for three months. Discussion Because of the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin-based protocols, patients should be evaluated according to cardiac functions before and during the chemotherapy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 454-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Umar Farooq ◽  
Brian K. Link ◽  
Mehrdad Hefazi ◽  
Cristine Allmer ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The addition of Rituximab to chemotherapy has significantly improved the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients treated with immunochemotherapy for DLBCL who achieve EFS24 (event-free for 2 years after diagnosis) have an overall survival equivalent to that of the age- and sex-matched general population. Relapses after achieving EFS24 have been considered to be unusual but have been understudied. We sought to define the rate, clinical characteristics, treatment pattern, and outcomes of such relapses. Methods: 1448 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL from March 2002 to June 2015 were included. Patients were enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE, treated per physician choice (predominantly R-CHOP immunochemotherapy) and followed prospectively. An event was defined as progression or relapse, unplanned re-treatment after initial therapy, or death from any cause. Cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after achieving EFS24 were analyzed as competing events using Gray's test in the EZR software. Post-relapse survival was defined as time from relapse to death from any cause and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method in SPSS (V22). Results: Among the 1448 patients, 1260 (87%) had DLBCL alone at diagnosis, and 188 (13%) had concurrent indolent lymphoma (follicular lymphoma 115, marginal zone lymphoma 18, chronic lymphocytic leukemia 14, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma 4, unspecified 37) at diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 83.9 months, 896 patients achieved EFS24. For all 896 patients who achieved EFS24, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 5.7%, 9.3% and 13.2%, respectively, at 2, 5 and 10 years after achieving EFS24. Patients with concurrent indolent lymphoma at diagnosis had a higher CIR compared to those with DLBCL alone at diagnosis (10.2 vs 4.8% at 2 years, 15.7 vs 8.0% at 5 years, 28.8 vs 9.7% at 10 years, P<0.001; Figure 1). There were a total of 84 patients who relapsed after achieving EFS24. The median age at initial diagnosis was 66 years (range 35-92), and 48 (57%) were male. At diagnosis, 11 (13%) had ECOG PS >1, 37 (50%) had LDH elevation, 62 (74%) were stage III-IV, 14 (17%) had more than 1 extranodal site, and 26 (31%) were poor risk by R-IPI score. There were 58 patients with DLBCL alone at diagnosis who relapsed after achieving EFS24, and 38 (75%) relapsed with DLBCL, 13 (25%) relapsed with indolent lymphoma (predominantly follicular lymphoma), and pathology was unknown in 7 patients. In contrast, there were 26 patients with concurrent indolent lymphoma at diagnosis who relapsed after achieving EFS24, and 9 (41%) relapsed with DLBCL, 13 (59%) relapsed with indolent lymphoma, and pathology was unknown in 4 patients. In the 47 patients who relapsed with DLBCL after achieving EFS24, 45% received intensive salvage chemotherapy, 19% received regular intensity chemotherapy, 9% received CNS directed chemotherapy, and 36% went on to receive autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In the 26 patients who relapsed with indolent lymphoma after achieving EFS24, 27% were initially observed, 54% received regular intensity chemotherapy, 4% received intensive salvage chemotherapy, and 19% received ASCT after subsequent progression. The median post-relapse survival (PRS) for all patients with a relapse after achieving EFS24 was 38.0 months (95% CI 27.5-48.5). The median PRS for patients who relapsed with DLBCL and indolent lymphoma after achieving EFS24 were 29.9 (19.9-39.9) and 89.9 (NR-NR) months, respectively (P=0.002; Figure 2). Conclusions: Relapses after achieving EFS24 in patients with DLBCL were uncommon in the rituximab era. Patient with DLBCL alone at diagnosis can relapse with either DLBCL or indolent lymphoma (3:1 ratio). Patients with concurrent DLBCL and indolent lymphoma at diagnosis had a significantly higher CIR, and relapses with DLBCL and indolent lymphoma were similar (2:3 ratio). Even with high intensity salvage chemotherapy and consolidative ASCT, patients who relapsed with DLBCL had a significantly worse survival compared to those who relapsed with indolent lymphoma. Late relapses with DLBCL remain clinically challenging, with a median survival of 2.5 years after relapse. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Maurer: Celgene: Research Funding; Nanostring: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding. Witzig:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ansell:Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Cerhan:Celgene: Research Funding; Jannsen: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Nanostring: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1666-1666
Author(s):  
Masahiro Uni ◽  
Yuki Kagoya ◽  
Yasuhito Nannya ◽  
Fumihiko Nakamura ◽  
Mineo Kurokawa

Abstract The addition of rituximab to CHOP (R-CHOP; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) has significantly improved the outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its secondary involvement in the central nervous system (CNS) is still a fatal event, and optimal therapeutic strategies have remained to be established. Combined immunochemotherapy with rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) followed by consolidation reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy and high-dose cytarabine is currently in use for patients with CNS relapse, though treatment outcome has not been evaluated enough. In the present study, we aimed to analyze the incidence and prognosis of CNS relapse of aggressive B-cell lymphoma in comparison with those of systemic relapse in the era of rituximab-containing regimens. We also estimated the risk factors and prognostic factors for CNS relapse. We retrospectively analyzed 278 consecutive adult patients (≥16 years old) who were diagnosed as DLBCL or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBL) at The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, from August 2003 through August 2013. We excluded patients who had CNS or intraocular involvement at diagnosis since those patients had received high-dose methotrexate-based therapy instead of R-CHOP. Four to six courses of intrathecal administration of methotrexate were performed in patients with adrenal gland, testis or breast involvement as prophylaxis for CNS relapse. The median follow-up period was 42 months, and the median age was 66 years (range, 23-91). Overall, 67 patients (24.1%) had relapse at any site, of which 24 patients (35.8%) had CNS involvement. The median interval between initial diagnosis and the occurrence of secondary CNS involvement was 212 days, and 15 of the 24 patients (62.5%) had CNS relapse within 1 year from the initial diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple or diffuse extranodal involvement at initial diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-10.91; P<0.01) was associated with the development of CNS relapse against non-CNS relapse. Chromosomal abnormality was investigated in 112 patients, of which 38 had abnormal karyotypes as identified by G-banding analysis for lymph nodes. Patients with CNS relapse more frequently harbored chromosomal abnormalities compared with those without relapse in univariate analysis (P=0.01). We also analyzed the survival of patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) as a control. Only two (7%) of 27 patients with PCNSL died during the follow-up period. Five-year OS from initial diagnosis was 92.3% (95% CI: 82.5-100.0%), and was significantly better than that for patients with CNS relapse (33.9%, 95% CI: 17.3-66.3%, P<0.01). Among 24 patients with CNS relapse, eight (33%) had systemic lesions other than CNS when diagnosed as CNS relapse, and four (17%) patients newly developed systemic lesions while treated for CNS relapse. Patients without concurrent systemic lesions attained a rather good prognosis by chemo-radiotherapy, while those harboring concurrent systemic lesions had dismal outcome (one-year OS after the diagnosis of relapse: 74.0% versus 12.4%, P<0.01, Figure 1, systemic relapse was treated as a time-dependent covariate). These results indicate that controlling systemic lesions as well as CNS ones is essential for treating patients with secondary CNS involvement of DLBCL. CNS lesions would be well controlled with R-MPV implementation as salvage therapy, nevertheless we should be careful for concurrent systemic lesions which might require different therapeutic strategies. Disclosures Nannya: Chugai Pharmaceutical CO., LTD: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kurokawa:Chugai Pharmaceutical CO., LTD: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1516-1516
Author(s):  
Andrea Kühnl ◽  
David Cunningham ◽  
Nicholas Counsell ◽  
Eliza A Hawkes ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have an inferior prognosis compared to younger patients. Dose intense administration of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP14) is superior to 3-weekly CHOP in elderly DLBCL patients (Pfreundschuh, Blood 2004), but this benefit has not been demonstrated with addition of rituximab (Delarue, Lancet Oncol 2013). We have previously shown that R-CHOP14 did not improve outcome compared to standard R-CHOP21 in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients aged 19-88 years across all subgroups (Cunningham, Lancet 2013). Here, we provide a detailed subgroup analysis of elderly patients (over 60 years) from the UK NCRI R-CHOP14 vs 21 randomised phase 3 trial. Methods: Between 2005 and 2008, 1080 patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 cycles R-CHOP21 or 6 cycles R-CHOP14 (+ G-CSF) with two additional rituximab applications. Of these, 604 patients were over 60 years and included in the current analysis (301 in the R-CHOP21 arm, 303 in the R-CHOP14 arm), with a median follow-up of 45 months. Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms. 36% of patients were over 70 years, 15% had a WHO performance status (PS) of 2, 65% stage III/IV disease, 44% bulky disease and 42% B symptoms. There was a trend towards a higher rate of BCL6 rearrangements (26% vs. 16%; P=0.10) and concurrent MYC - and BCL2 rearrangements (double hit lymphoma as determined by FISH, 8% vs. 2%; P=0.06) in the R-CHOP14 arm compared to the R-CHOP21 arm. 85% (257/303) of patients received 8 cycles of R-CHOP14, whereas only 76% (230/301) completed all 8 cycles R-CHOP21. However, percentage of patients receiving at least 6 cycles of therapy was similar (88% and 89%, respectively). Dose delays of myelosuppressive drugs occurred more frequently in patients receiving R-CHOP21 vs. R-CHOP14 (51% vs. 39%; P=0.03) due to a higher incidence of haematological toxicities likely related to the reduced use of G-CSF. G-CSF was mandatory for patients on R-CHOP14 and was given to 57% of patients on R-CHOP21 as secondary prophylaxis. The frequency of dose reductions was similar in the R-CHOP21 and R-CHOP14 arms (15% vs. 16%; P=0.73). Toxicities of grade III+ were seen in 72% and 60% of patients in the R-CHOP14 and R-CHOP21 arms, respectively. There was evidence of a higher incidence of grade III+ neutropenia (62% vs. 36%) and a lower rate of thrombocytopenia (7% vs. 12%) in the R-CHOP21 arm compared to R-CHOP14. The incidence of fever and infections was similar in both arms. There was no evidence of a difference in response rates between the R-CHOP14 and R-CHOP21 arms [complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR (CRu) rates: 62% vs. 67%, respectively; overall response rate both 91%]. CR/CRu rates after 4 cycles of therapy were 33% and 39% respectively (P=0.15). There was no difference regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between arms, neither in the total cohort of elderly patients, nor in the subgroup of patients over 70 years [OS (all elderly): hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 (95% CI: 0.67-1.24); P=0.55; PFS (all elderly): HR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.74-1.29); P=0.86]. 3-year PFS was 71% (95% CI: 67-74) in all patients over 60 years and 64% (95% CI: 58-71) in patients over 70 years. 3-year OS was 75% (95% CI: 72-79) and 67% (95% CI: 61-74) in patients over 60 years and over 70 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis including individual factors of the International Prognostic Index (IPI), as well as age as continuous variable, gender, presence of B symptoms, bulky disease, b2-microglobulin higher than 3mg/l and albumin higher than 35 g/l, only age was of independent prognostic significance for OS (P=0.01). Besides the standard IPI and the NCCN-IPI, an elderly IPI (E-IPI; Advani, BJH 2010) and the ABE4 score (Prochazka, PLoS One 2014) have been proposed for better prognostication of elderly DLBCL patients. A detailed comparison of these different prognostic models in our dataset will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Outcome and toxicities in DLBCL patients over 60 years treated within the NCRI R-CHOP14 vs 21 trial are comparable to results from other randomised studies investigating R-CHOP14 or R-CHOP21 in elderly DLBCL patients. Our data further support the similar efficacy and tolerability of both R-CHOP variants for first-line treatment of this patient group. Disclosures Cunningham: Amgen: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Merrimack: Research Funding; Merck Serono: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Pocock:Janssen: Honoraria. Ardeshna:Roche: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4145-4145
Author(s):  
Andrew M Evens ◽  
Monika Pilichowska ◽  
Stefania Pittaluga ◽  
Judith Ferry ◽  
Jessica Hemminger ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: GZL (B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL andcHL) was first described in 2005 and included in the 2008 WHO classification. The majority of cases present withmediastinal disease and share features withcHL and primarymediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Non-mediastinal lymphomas with similar features have also been reported. Due to the relative rarity and the diagnostic complexity of this disease, data on GZL are limited and further description of this entity is desired. METHODS: Clinical data from cases originally diagnosed as GZL were collected from 15 academic centers across the United States and Canada (Evens et al. Am J Hematol, 2015). In an attempt to further characterize the diagnostic features and clinical correlations, 73 cases (including 62 cases from the aforementioned series and 11 subsequently collected cases) were obtained and submitted for central pathology review using criteria of the 2016 revisedWHO classification. All diagnostic samples were evaluated with a panel comprising CD20, CD79a, PAX5, OCT2, BCL6, MUM1, CD30, CD15, CD3 and EBV by in situ hybridization (EBER). Beyond the tumor cellimmunoprofile, diagnostic criteria included: tumor cell density and morphology, necrosis, and the microenvironment. Five cases were rejected for insufficient material/technical issues. Collectively, 68 cases were evaluated by 5 experthematopathologists and consensus diagnosis was reached at multi-headed scope review. Additionally, clinical data were obtained to analyze patient (pt) characteristics and disease outcomes. RESULTS: Of 68 cases given an original diagnosis of GZL from academic institutions, only 26 cases (38%) were confirmed as GZL on consensus review. Pt characteristics of these 26 GZL cases included: 15M/11F; median age 37 years (range 19-72); 42% B symptoms; 61% anemia; 35% increased LDH; and 33% with hypoalbuminemia. 11/26 (42%) biopsies were mediastinal in origin, and in an additional 4 cases, a mediastinal mass was present clinically; 11 (42%) had only peripheral lymphadenopathy/disease (ie, non-mediastinal). 60% of pts had stage I/II disease with 16% having stage IV. GZL cases were characterized by high tumor cell density and paucity of a mixed inflammatory background (both contrary as seen in cHL). The immunohistochemical profiles of the 26 consensus GZL cases are noted in the Table. Notably, only 1 GZL case was EBV positive. 42/68 (62%) of the original cases were reclassified as follows: nodular sclerosis (NS)cHL, n=27 [n=10 of which werecHL, NS grade 2 (cHL-NS2)] and one lymphocyte-richcHL (LRCHL), n=1; DLBCL NOS, n=4; PMBCL, n=2; nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL), n=3; EBV positive LBCL, n=3; and B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, n=1. Most cases ofcHL diagnosed as GZL had strong CD20 expression. Further, cHL-NS2 was often misdiagnosed as GZL usually due to confluent growth of lacunar cells. Clinically, therapy received and outcomes were available for 25 of 26 of the aforementioned consensus GZL cases; the overall response rate (ORR) for these consensus confirmed GZL cases was 64% (complete remission (CR) 48%) with 28% ofpts experiencing primary refractory disease to frontline therapy. Relapse rates by primary chemotherapy regimen for thesepts were: ABVD 5/6 (83%); CHOP 7/17 (41%); and EPOCH 1/2 (50%). Among consensus GZLpts with relapsed disease, 71% underwent autologous SCT. With a median follow-up of 40 months, the 3-year PFS was 44% with 3-year OS of 90% for the consensus GZL pts. Among all other cases that were reclassified to a non-GZL diagnostic entity, the ORR was 75% (CR 67%) with 3-year PFS and OS rates of 52% and 80%, respectively. This included a relapse rate of 86% amongpts with cHL-NS2. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis of GZL remains challenging. Relative rarity of the cases and overlap withcHL, especially thecHL-NS variant with lymphocytic depletion and confluent lacunar cells (also known as cHL-NS2), contribute to this difficulty. Diagnosis should be based on integration of architectural, cytological andimmunophenotypic features. In addition, relapse rates are high with standard chemotherapy regimens, especially ABVD-based therapy. Enhanced biologic understanding and improved therapeutic strategies are needed for GZL. Disclosures Evens: Takeda: Other: Advisory board. Abramson:Abbvie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy. Fenske:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Seatle Genetics: Honoraria. Friedberg:Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Blum:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 96-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahlia Sano ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Nathan H. Fowler ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
F. B. Hagemeister ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy product that was FDA approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy. In the pivotal ZUMA-1 study, the best overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates observed in 108 patients treated with axi-cel were 82% and 58%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of the patients remain in ongoing response (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients <65 years (N=81) and ³65 years (N=27) showed that the ORR and ongoing response at 12 months were comparable between the two subgroups (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Whether the safety is also comparable between the two subgroups is unknown. Here, we report safety outcomes in elderly patients (³65 years) with large B-cell lymphoma treated with axi-cel at our institution. Methods We retrospectively analyzed and reviewed the data from patients treated with axi-cel at our institution. Patients had a diagnosis of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL). Patients were treated with conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for 3 days followed by axi-cel infusion after 2 days of rest at a dose of 2 x 106 CAR+ T cells/kg body weight. Patients were monitored for toxicities for at least 7 days in the hospital after CAR T infusion and those who had at least 30 days of follow-up after axi-cel were considered to be evaluable for safety. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicity termed as CAR-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) were graded according to the CARTOX grading system (Neelapu et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018). Results A total of 61 patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axi-cel at our institution were included. Of these, 44 (72%) patients were <65 years of age and 17 (28%) patients were ³65 years of age. The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. ORR and CR rates at Day 30 were comparable between the two groups. CRS was common in both groups and was observed in 83% and 91% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. But most CRS events were grade 1-2. Grade 3 or higher CRS was observed in 18% vs. 11% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.67). One patient with a history of autoimmune disease in the elderly group died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). CRES was observed in 58% and 71% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. Grade 3 or higher CRES was observed in 29% vs. 39% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.58). Median hospitalization period for axi-cel CAR T-cell therapy was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that response rates are comparable between the elderly and younger age groups at day 30 after axi-cel therapy. Importantly, toxicities due to CRS and/or CRES after axi-cel CD19 CAR T cell therapy are comparable between the elderly (³65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Nastoupil: Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Fowler:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Westin:Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apotex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2987-2987
Author(s):  
Brady E. Beltrán ◽  
Victoria Otero ◽  
Marialejandra Torres Viera ◽  
Camila Peña ◽  
Myriam Lucía Rodriguez ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent subtype of lymphoma in the world. The IPI score is a powerful risk-stratification tool in patients with DLBCL. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown to be prognostic in patients with DLBCL in Asia, Europe and USA. The GELL is a recently formed group for the study of lymphomas in Latin America composed by large institutions from eleven countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the NLR is a prognostic factor in Latin American patients with DLBCL. Methods: We included patients with a pathological diagnosis of DLBCL who were diagnosed and treated at our institution between 2012-2013. IRB approval was obtained prior to research, and pathological samples were reviewed by hematopathologists at each of the participating institutions to confirm the diagnosis. Pertinent clinicopathological data were collected through chart review and are presented using descriptive statistics. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil by the absolute lymphocyte count and dichotomized in NLR≥4 and NLR<4. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate Cox models were fitted to evaluate hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 329 patients with a diagnosis of DLBCL were included in this analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 18-83 years) with a slight female predominance (54%). Clinically, 59% of patients were 60 or older, 34% had ECOG >1, 29% had elevated LDH, and 70% had extranodal disease; 49% had early stage and 51% had stage III and IV. The IPI score was low risk in 36%, low-intermediate in 25%, high intermediate in 22% and high risk in 17%. 41% of patients had NLR ≥4. 89% of patients received standard R-CHOP, 2% received R-miniCHOP and 9% received other regimens. The overall response rate as 83%; 69% had complete response and 14% had partial response. The median follow-up for the entire group was 5 years (95% CI 4.9-5.4 years). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for the entire group was 65%. The 5-year OS rates for patients with NLR ≥4 and <4 were 59% and 71%, respectively (p=0.008). Patients with low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate and high IPI scores had 5-year OS rates of 80%, 65%, 56% and 45%, respectively (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, advanced stage (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9-5.0; p<0.001), LDH level (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.2; p=0.016) and NLR ≥4 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6; p=0.03) were statistically independent factors associated with worse OS. NLR ≥4 was an adverse prognostic factor after adjusting for IPI score (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6; p=0.01). Conclusion: The NLR appears as a novel and easy to use prognostic factor for OS, independent of the IPI score, in previously untreated Latin American patients with DLBCL. Our findings support the need for validation of the NLR in larger retrospective or prospective studies in patients with DLBCL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Chiattone: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Castillo:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document