Mutational Landscape of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapsing after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 601-601
Author(s):  
Jessica I Hoell ◽  
Sebastian Ginzel ◽  
Cornelia Eckert ◽  
Michael Gombert ◽  
Ute Fischer ◽  
...  

Abstract The prognosis of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) relapsing following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is still dismal. Within the framework of the ALL-REZ BFM 2002/ALL-SZT BFM 2003 trials, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) of ten patients relapsing after allo-SCT with the aim to thoroughly characterize the spectrum of acquired mutations and to identify potentially druggable targets, thus laying the ground for future personalized treatment strategies. Patients' age at initial diagnosis ranged from <12 months to 10 years. Two patients were diagnosed with T-ALL and 8 with pre-B-ALL. Time from initial disease to relapse ranged from 13 to 40 months. Patients underwent allo-SCT 3 to 6 months after diagnosis of relapse, donors were either HLA-matched unrelated volunteers (n=6), HLA-identical siblings (n=1) or HLA-haploidentical family donors (n=1). Time from SCT to relapse ranged from 3 to 21 months. Treatment following the post allo-SCT relapse varied considerably (from palliative care to a second allo-SCT). Only 2/10 patients are still alive, with one recently having been diagnosed with subsequent relapse following a second SCT. To investigate the mutational landscape of relapsed ALL following high-dose chemotherapeutic and immunologic attack both provided by an allo-SCT, five samples per patient were analyzed: initial leukemia (INIT), remission (REMI) after front-line chemotherapy representing patient germline, first relapse (RLPS), full donor-chimeric remission post allo-SCT (TREMI) representing donor germline, and relapse post allo-SCT (TRLPS). For comparative analyses, we defined the following three "oncogenomes" (OGs): OG1 (initial leukemia, SNVs in INIT minus REMI)), OG2 (first relapse, SNVs in RLPS minus REMI), OG3 (post allo-SCT relapse, SNVs in TRPLS minus REMI or TREMI). Median numbers of leukemia-specific SNVs in OG1-3 were 8.5, 34 and 37.5. We detected a median of 0.18 mutations per megabase (MB) in OG1, 0.67 mutations/MB in OG2 and 0.74 mutations/MB in OG3 (p= 0.005 for OG2/3 vs. OG1 [Wilcoxon test]). Although the mutational spectrum was highly diverse between individual patients and within the oncogenomes, we also identified several recurrent alterations: in OG1, five genes had recurrent SNVs (IGSF3, TTN, NOTCH1, CTBP2, NRAS). Seven genes were recurrently affected in three OG2s, including IKZF1, NOTCH1, NRAS, NT5C2. In OG3 we detected eleven recurrently mutated genes in three patients, among which were NRAS, FLT4, and TP53. Notably, TP53 was mutated in 5/10 patients. One patient carried a TP53 germline mutation, one patient had one unique SNV each in OG2 as well as OG3 and three patients had TP53 mutations only present in their OG3s. All but one SNV (resulting in a premature stop codon) were non-synonymously coding and were predicted to be deleterious for protein function. Of particular note, leukemic blasts showed profound plasticity concerning the mutational status of the nucleoside exporter NT5C2, mutations of which were previously shown to drive chemotherapy resistance in relapsed childhood ALL. While NT5C2 alterations were completely absent in OG1, 4 SNVs were detected in the OG2s of 3/10 patients. However, these NT5C2 mutations disappeared again in the OG3s once selection pressure of maintenance chemotherapy employing nucleoside analogues had been withdrawn. To identify novel treatment options in the desperate clinical scenario of post allo-SCT relapse, we searched OG3 for genetic lesions in genes known to be either targeted directly (a certain gene) or indirectly (a certain pathway) by currently approved therapeutic agents. To our surprise, nine out of ten patients exhibited such SNVs, for which additional targeted therapies are already available. Those therapeutic agents comprise small molecules inhibitors as well as antibodies such as Dasatinib, Erlotinib, Ibrutinib, Pazopanib, Tocilizumab, and Trastuzumab. Conclusion: Our comprehensive genetic analysis of ten children with ALL relapsing post allo-SCT revealed profound leukemic cell plasticity (e.g. loss of acquired NT5C2 mutations) as well as identified several recurrent genetic alterations (e.g. NOTCH1, NRAS, IKZF1) including TP53 (5/10 patients). Most importantly, we identified alterations in genes amenable to targeted treatment approaches in 9/10 patients thus potentially opening new therapeutic avenues. Disclosures Bader: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Neovii Biotech: Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Research Funding. Peters:Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Medac: Consultancy.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (36) ◽  
pp. 5750-5762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulla M. Saarinen-Pihkala ◽  
Carsten Heilmann ◽  
Jacek Winiarski ◽  
Anders Glomstein ◽  
Jonas Abrahamsson ◽  
...  

Purpose Our focus was on patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who experienced relapse or died without becoming transplantation candidates. The purpose was to outline measures needed to improve the outcome. Patients and Methods We analyzed our population-based 20-year data on 3,385 Nordic children with ALL treated on Nordic Society for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology ALL protocols, and described the flow of these patients through relapses, remissions, and deaths as a result of toxicity, demonstrating where major patient losses occurred. Results In total, 854 patients (25%) had a first and 274 patients (8%) had a second ALL relapse. P for survival after the first relapse was .35 ± .02. The induction mortality (2.2%, primary; 10.3%, first relapse; 26.3%, second relapse) and remission mortality (1%, first complete remission [1CR]; 19%, second CR [2CR]) were significant; transplantation-related mortality (TRM) only represented 15% (69 of 459) of the deaths as a result of toxicity. Of the 766 patients entering 2CR, 29% underwent transplantation (P for survival, .46 ± .04), whereas 71% continued receiving chemotherapy (P for survival, .39 ± .02). Children with stem-cell transplantation indications in 2CR, if they did not undergo transplantation, generally died or had a second relapse. The patient groups that underwent transplantation in 1CR (n = 84), 2CR (n = 220), and ≥ 3CR (n = 62) represented different risk profiles. Those with allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in ≥ 3CR (P for survival, .37 ± .07) had an ALL and first relapse with favorable features. Conclusion Major patient losses occurred through mortality as a result of toxicity and resistant disease during the pathways before allo-SCT. After relapse, more patients were lost to mortality as a result of toxicity during conventional chemotherapy compared with TRM. After second relapse, the chance for rescue by allo-SCT in ≥ 3CR was minimal. The question of whether transplantation is recommended after ALL relapse should be carefully addressed, and more efficient relapse protocols should be launched.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (6) ◽  
pp. 1375-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan J. Cornelissen ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Gregor E. G. Verhoef ◽  
Mars B. van 't Veer ◽  
Marinus H. J. van Oers ◽  
...  

Abstract While commonly accepted in poor-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is still disputed in adult patients with standard-risk ALL. We evaluated outcome of patients with ALL in first complete remission (CR1), according to a sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. Eligible patients (433) were entered in 2 consecutive, prospective studies, of whom 288 (67%) were younger than 55 years, in CR1, and eligible to receive consolidation by either an autologous SCT or an allo-SCT. Allo-SCT was performed in 91 of 96 patients with a compatible sibling donor. Cumulative incidences of relapse at 5 years were, respectively, 24 and 55% for patients with a donor versus those without a donor (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 0.23-0.60; P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality estimated 16% (± 4) at 5 years after allo-SCT. As a result, disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly better in the donor group: 60 versus 42% in the no-donor group (HR: 0.60; 0.41-0.89; P = .01). After risk-group analysis, improved outcome was more pronounced in standard-risk patients with a donor, who experienced an overall survival of 69% at 5 years (P = .05). In conclusion, standard-risk ALL patients with a sibling donor may show favorable survival following SCT, due to both a strong reduction of relapse and a modest nonrelapse mortality. This trial is registered with http://www.trialregister.nl under trial ID NTR228.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2816-2825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Kiehl ◽  
Ludwig Kraut ◽  
Rainer Schwerdtfeger ◽  
Bernd Hertenstein ◽  
Mats Remberger ◽  
...  

Purpose The role of unrelated allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients is still not clear, and only limited data are available from the literature. We analyzed factors affecting clinical outcome of ALL patients receiving a related or unrelated stem-cell graft from matched donors. Patients and Methods The total study population was 264 adult patients receiving a myeloablative allogeneic stem-cell transplant for ALL at nine bone marrow transplantation centers between 1990 and 2002. Of these, 221 patients receiving a matched related or unrelated graft were analyzed. One hundred forty-eight patients received transplantation in complete remission; 62 patients were in relapse; and 11 patients were refractory to chemotherapy before transplant. Fifty percent of patients received bone marrow, and 50% received peripheral blood stem cell from a human leukocyte antigen–identical related (n = 103), or matched unrelated (n = 118) donor. Results Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 28%, with 76 patients (34%) still alive (2.2 to 103 months post-transplantation), and 145 deceased (65 relapses, transplant-related mortality, 45%). We observed an advantage regarding DFS in favor of patients receiving transplantation during their first complete remission (CR) in comparison with patients receiving transplantation in or after second CR (P = .014) or who relapsed (P < .001). We observed a clear trend toward improved survival in favor of B-lineage ALL patients compared with T-lineage ALL patients (P = .052), and Philadelphia chromosome–positive patients had no poorer outcome than Philadelphia chromosome–negative patients. Total-body irradiation–based conditioning improved DFS in comparison with busulfan (P = .041). Conclusion Myeloablative matched related or matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in ALL patients should be performed in first CR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document