scholarly journals A community-centered approach to sickle cell disease and clinical trials participation: an evaluation of perceptions, facilitators, and barriers

Author(s):  
LaTasha H Lee ◽  
LaShanta H Whisenton ◽  
Jasmine Benger ◽  
Sophie Lanzkron

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited red blood cell disorder in the United States, affecting 70,000-100,000 Americans and causing a range of serious medical complications. Although the cause of SCD was established decades ago, existing therapies have varied effectiveness and side effects, and novel therapies have been slow to develop. The limitations of existing treatment options highlight the need for new therapies that are aligned with the desires of the community. To date, little has been done to systematically seek and report the opinions and experiences of people with SCD regarding clinical research. In 2019, the American Society of Hematology Research Collaborative (ASH RC) conducted eight community workshops across the United States engaging 472 people, including persons with SCD and caregivers of those living with the disease. The workshop goals included assessing understanding, awareness, and perceptions of clinical research; and identifying the most critical clinical trial considerations of this community. Participants were asked about their experiences living with SCD and their satisfaction with treatment options. Pain and fatigue were reported as symptoms requiring better therapies. Although few participants reported being asked to enroll in a clinical trial, they expressed conditional willingness to participate. A majority were willing to share personal health information to further research and improve health outcomes. To actively engage the SCD community and increase enrollment and retention in clinical trials, researchers should address the treatment priorities of this population and ensure they have access to trusted information about clinical research and opportunities for participation.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1640-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun L Singh ◽  
Carlos Lastra ◽  
Kris M. Mahadeo

Abstract Abstract 1640 A National Institutes of Health expert panel concluded that barriers to hydroxyurea (HU) therapy for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) exist at multiple levels, including that of healthcare providers.1 Despite calls for more widespread use of HU among infants with SCD, only a small fraction of those who meet currently accepted criteria for HU administration are actually prescribed therapy.1 To address this disparity, we assessed barriers to HU therapy as perceived by Pediatric Hematologists-Oncologists in the United States. This study was approved by the institutional review board. We surveyed 400 Pediatric Hematologists/Oncologists from varying regions in the United States. Prospective participants were emailed a link to an anonymous online survey. To ensure an optimal response rate, two-follow up emails were sent at two week intervals to those who did not initially respond. Our survey instrument was evaluated for content validity by 5 Pediatric subspecialists from geographically diverse areas of the country and included both public and private settings. Response rate was equal to (complete responses+ partial responses)/(complete responses + partial responses + nonresponse + implicit refusals). In this study, a complete response was defined as 80% or more of questions answered and a partial response as less than 80% of questions answered. The response rate for this survey was 25% (n=99). Respondents’ primary areas of practice included pediatric hematology (27.5%; n=22), general pediatric hematology oncology (57.5%, n=46) and pediatric oncology (15%, n=12). Respondents’ practices ranged in the size of their sickle cell populations from 3 to 1600 (median=300). The vast majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that HU was an effective treatment for children with SCD (98%, n= 83). Most respondents (55%, n=45) reported the age range of 1–5 years as the youngest age at which they initiated HU therapy among their patients, 17% (n=14) had initiated therapy in a patient between 6months and 1 year of age. Common independent criteria for HU initiation included recurrent acute chest syndromes (94%, n=78), vaso-occlusive crises (93%, n=77), other pulmonary disease (including increased tricuspid regurgitation velocities) (66%, n=55) and priapism (58%, n=48). Interestingly, 30% (n=25) of respondents used patient/family request as an independent criterion for HU therapy. Compliance/adherence (89%, n=72), need for frequent monitoring (78%, n=68) and family concerns regarding toxicity (76%, n= 63) were the most commonly reported barriers to the effective use of HU therapy among patients with SCD. While, 57.8% (n=48) of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that HU is an effective drug for the prevention of organ damage among infants with SCD, only 32% (n= 26) supported the prophylactic use of HU for infants (>6 months) with severe sickle genotypes (SS, SB0), regardless of disease severity. Respondents were most concerned about cytopenias (68%, n=55), fertility (46%, n=37), risk of malignancy (27%, n=22), gastrointestinal disturbances (26%, n=21) and avascular necrosis (17%, n=14). The majority of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to establish the long-term safety and efficacy profile of HU treatment before prophylactic therapy is offered to infants with severe sickle cell genotypes, irrespective of their disease severity (78%, n=63), or to infants with SCD regardless of genotype and disease severity (82%, n=67). Respondents identified lack of funding for (71%, n=73) and family/patient mistrust towards a clinical trial (45%, n=46) as the major barriers to conducting a prospective study. The majority of respondents (94%, n=78) supported the establishment of a registry for all patients with SCD who are on HU therapy. While most respondents believe HU to be an effective drug for the treatment of patients with SCD and for prevention of associated organ damage, there is concern for potential toxicities of therapy. Most respondents support a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial and/or establishment of a registry for the use of prophylactic HU therapy among infants with SCD. 1. Brawley OW, Conrelius LJ, Edwards LR, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: hydroxyurea treatment for sickle cell disease. Ann Internal Med. 2008; 148:932-938. Disclosures: Off Label Use: off-label use of hydroxyurea in children.


2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Karafin ◽  
Arun K. Singavi ◽  
Mehraboon S. Irani ◽  
Kathleen E. Puca ◽  
Lisa Baumann Kreuziger ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (23) ◽  
pp. 3982-4001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann T. Farrell ◽  
Julie Panepinto ◽  
C. Patrick Carroll ◽  
Deepika S. Darbari ◽  
Ankit A. Desai ◽  
...  

Abstract To address the global burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) and the need for novel therapies, the American Society of Hematology partnered with the US Food and Drug Administration to engage the work of 7 panels of clinicians, investigators, and patients to develop consensus recommendations for clinical trial end points. The panels conducted their work through literature reviews, assessment of available evidence, and expert judgment focusing on end points related to: patient-reported outcomes (PROs), pain (non-PROs), the brain, end-organ considerations, biomarkers, measurement of cure, and low-resource settings. This article presents the findings and recommendations of the PROs, pain, and brain panels, as well as relevant findings and recommendations from the biomarkers panel. The panels identify end points, where there were supporting data, to use in clinical trials of SCD. In addition, the panels discuss where further research is needed to support the development and validation of additional clinical trial end points.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S108 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Huo ◽  
H Xiao ◽  
M Garg ◽  
C Shah ◽  
DJ Wilkie ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather K. Schopper ◽  
Christopher F. D’Esposito ◽  
John S. Muus ◽  
Julie Kanter ◽  
Ted A. Meyer

2020 ◽  
Vol 255 ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Hogen ◽  
Michelle Kim ◽  
Yelim Lee ◽  
Mary Lo ◽  
Navpreet Kaur ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. S28-S36
Author(s):  
Amanda B. Payne ◽  
Jason M. Mehal ◽  
Christina Chapman ◽  
Dana L. Haberling ◽  
Lisa C. Richardson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (16) ◽  
pp. 3804-3813
Author(s):  
Julie Kanter ◽  
Wally R. Smith ◽  
Payal C. Desai ◽  
Marsha Treadwell ◽  
Biree Andemariam ◽  
...  

Abstract Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in the United States. It is a medically and socially complex, multisystem illness that affects individuals throughout the lifespan. Given improvements in care, most children with SCD survive into adulthood. However, access to adult sickle cell care is poor in many parts of the United States, resulting in increased acute care utilization, disjointed care delivery, and early mortality for patients. A dearth of nonmalignant hematology providers, the lack of a national SCD registry, and the absence of a centralized infrastructure to facilitate comparative quality assessment compounds these issues. As part of a workshop designed to train health care professionals in the skills necessary to establish clinical centers focused on the management of adults living with SCD, we defined an SCD center, elucidated required elements of a comprehensive adult SCD center, and discussed different models of care. There are also important economic impacts of these centers at an institutional and health system level. As more clinicians are trained in providing adult-focused SCD care, center designation will enhance the ability to undertake quality improvement and compare outcomes between SCD centers. Activities will include an assessment of the clinical effectiveness of expanded access to care, the implementation of SCD guidelines, and the efficacy of newly approved targeted medications. Details of this effort are provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document