scholarly journals Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combinationversusmono-components in COPD (GOLD 2–4)

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 969-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Buhl ◽  
François Maltais ◽  
Roger Abrahams ◽  
Leif Bjermer ◽  
Eric Derom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Multicentre Phase ◽  
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire

Efficacy and safety of tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with the mono-components was evaluated in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in two replicate, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III trials.Patients received tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 2.5/5 μg or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 μg or 5 μg, or olodaterol 5 μg delivered once-dailyviaRespimat inhaler over 52 weeks. Primary end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0–3) response, trough FEV1 response and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 24 weeks.In total, 5162 patients (2624 in Study 1237.5 and 2538 in Study 1237.6) received treatment. Both FDCs significantly improved FEV1 AUC0–3 and trough FEV1 responseversusthe mono-components in both studies. Statistically significant improvements in SGRQ total scoreversusthe mono-components were only seen for tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 5/5 μg. Incidence of adverse events was comparable between the FDCs and the mono-components.These studies demonstrated significant improvements in lung function and health-related quality of life with once-daily tiotropium+olodaterol FDCversusmono-components over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

scholarly journals Effects of umeclidinium/vilanterol on exercise endurance in COPD: a randomised study

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 00073-2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Riley ◽  
Chris J. Kalberg ◽  
Alison Donald ◽  
David A. Lipson ◽  
Muhammad Shoaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Endurance Time ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Residual Capacity ◽  
Exercise Endurance

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study assessed the effect of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) on exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT).Patients were randomised 1:1 to one of two treatment sequences: 1) UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg followed by placebo or 2) placebo followed by UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg. Each treatment was taken once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end-point was 3-h post-dose exercise endurance time (EET) at week 12. Secondary end-points included trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and 3-h post-dose functional residual capacity (FRC), both at week 12. COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score at week 12 was also assessed.UMEC/VI treatment did not result in a statistically significant improvement in EET change from baseline at week 12 versus placebo (p=0.790). However, improvements were observed in trough FEV1 (206 mL, 95% CI 167–246), 3-h post-dose FRC (−346 mL, 95% CI −487 to −204) and CAT score (−1.07 units, 95% CI −2.09 to −0.05) versus placebo at week 12.UMEC/VI did not result in improvements in EET at week 12 versus placebo, despite improvements in measures of lung function, hyperinflation and health status.

scholarly journals Lung function, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of inhaled indacaterol maleate and acetate in asthma patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Miller ◽  
Soniya Vaidya ◽  
Juergen Jauernig ◽  
Brian Ethell ◽  
Kristina Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Function ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Electronic Diary ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Salt Forms

Abstract Background Indacaterol maleate delivered with the Breezhaler® inhalation device is a long-acting β2-agonist approved for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In the development of a once daily, inhaled fixed dose combination (FDC) of indacaterol, glycopyrronium bromide (a long-acting muscarinic antagonist), and mometasone furoate (an inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]) for the treatment of patients with asthma, the acetate salt of indacaterol is used instead of the maleate salt. Here, we investigated the lung function, pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of indacaterol maleate 150 μg once daily (o.d.) and indacaterol acetate 150 μg o.d. in comparison with placebo. Methods This was a randomised, double-blind, three-period crossover study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03257995) in patients with asthma on background ICS therapy. Patients with percent predicted pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume per second (FEV1) ≥50% and ≤ 90% were included in the study. Patients received indacaterol maleate 150 μg o.d., indacaterol acetate 150 μg o.d., or placebo on top of stable background ICS in randomised sequence. Trough FEV1 was assessed after 14 days of treatment. PK of indacaterol salts were assessed at steady state after 14 days of treatment; peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate and rescue medication use were collected with a combined PEF-meter/electronic diary throughout the study. Results Of the 54 adult patients (median age of 48 years), 51 patients completed the study. Both indacaterol salts demonstrated statistically significant improvements in trough FEV1 of 186 mL (maleate) and 146 mL (acetate) compared with placebo (both P < 0.001). FEV1 AUC0-4h improved by 248 mL (maleate) and 245 mL (acetate), and PEF by 33 L/min (maleate) and 30.8 L/min (acetate) versus placebo. Systemic exposure of indacaterol (AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss on Day 14) was comparable after administration of both salt forms. Both salt forms demonstrated a good safety profile and were well tolerated, with a difference in the reporting frequency of AEs of coughing (maleate, 23.5%; acetate, 0%). Conclusions In patients with asthma, indacaterol maleate and acetate elicited comparable and significant improvements in lung function compared with placebo and achieved comparable systemic exposure. Both indacaterol salts were safe and well tolerated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03257995 June 06, 2017

scholarly journals Triple therapy for COPD: a crude analysis from a systematic review of the evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175346661988552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Lopez-Campos ◽  
Laura Carrasco-Hernandez ◽  
Esther Quintana-Gallego ◽  
Carmen Calero-Acuña ◽  
Eduardo Márquez-Martín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire ◽  
Supplementary Material ◽  
Crude Analysis

We systematically reviewed the current knowledge on fixed-dose triple therapies for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with a specific focus on its efficacy versus single bronchodilation, double fixed dose combinations, and open triple therapies. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to 3 August 2018. We selected articles with randomized controlled or crossover design conducted in patients with COPD and published as full-length articles or scientific letters, evaluating triple therapy combinations in a single or different inhaler, and with efficacy data versus monocomponents, double combinations, or open triple therapies. Our systematic search reported 108 articles, of which 24 trials were finally selected for the analysis. A total of 7 studies with fixed dose triple therapy combinations, and 17 studies with open triple therapies combinations. Triple therapy showed improvements in lung function [trough forced expiratory volume (FEV1) ranging from not significant (NS) to 147 ml], health status using the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [(SGRQ) from NS to 8.8 points], and exacerbations [risk ratio (RR) from NS to 0.59 for all exacerbations] versus single or double therapies with a variability in the response, depending the specific combination, and the comparison group. The proportion of adverse effects was similar between study groups, the exception being the increase in pneumonia for some inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) containing groups. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplementary material section.

scholarly journals Improvements in lung function with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler versus dual therapies in patients with COPD: a sub-study of the ETHOS trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus F. Rabe ◽  
Fernando J. Martinez ◽  
Dave Singh ◽  
Roopa Trivedi ◽  
Martin Jenkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Function ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Dose Inhaler ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Metered Dose ◽  
Formoterol Fumarate

Background: In the phase III, 52-week ETHOS study in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF), at two inhaled corticosteroid dose levels, resulted in significantly lower moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) and budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF). Here, we report results from the ETHOS pulmonary function test (PFT) sub-study, which assessed lung function in a subset of ETHOS patients. Methods: ETHOS (NCT02465567) was a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, parallel-group study in patients with moderate to very severe COPD who had experienced ⩾1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. Patients received BGF 320/18/9.6 µg, BGF 160/18/9.6 μg, GFF 18/9.6 µg, or BFF 320/9.6 µg twice daily via a single metered dose Aerosphere inhaler for 52 weeks. A subset of patients participated in the 4-hour PFT sub-study; primary endpoints were change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) versus GFF and FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0–4) versus BFF at week 24. Results: The PFT modified intent-to-treat population included 3088 patients (mean age 64.4 years; mean reversibility post-albuterol 16.7%; mean post-albuterol FEV1% predicted 42.8). BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg significantly improved morning pre-dose trough FEV1 at week 24 versus GFF ( p ⩽ 0.0035 for both). Improvements in trough FEV1 were also observed at week 52 for BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg versus GFF ( p ⩽ 0.0005 for both). For FEV1 AUC0–4 at week 24, BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg showed significant improvements versus BFF ( p < 0.0001 for both). Improvements were maintained at week 52 ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions: BGF 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg significantly improved trough FEV1 versus GFF and FEV1 AUC0–4 versus BFF at week 24. The lung function benefits with both doses of BGF were maintained following 52 weeks of treatment. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

scholarly journals Budesonide/formoterol MDI with co-suspension delivery technology in COPD: the TELOS study

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1801334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary T. Ferguson ◽  
Alberto Papi ◽  
Antonio Anzueto ◽  
Edward M. Kerwin ◽  
Christy Cappelletti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dry Powder Inhaler ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Dose Inhaler ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Delivery Technology ◽  
Formoterol Fumarate

TELOS compared budesonide (BD)/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (FF) metered dose inhaler (BFF MDI), formulated using innovative co-suspension delivery technology that enables consistent aerosol performance, with its monocomponents and budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate dry powder inhaler (DPI) in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), without a requirement for an exacerbation history.In this phase III, double-blind, parallel-group, 24-week study (NCT02766608), patients were randomised to BFF MDI 320/10 µg (n=664), BFF MDI 160/10 µg (n=649), FF MDI 10 µg (n=648), BD MDI 320 µg (n=209) or open-label budesonide/formoterol DPI 400/12 µg (n=219). Primary end-points were change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and FEV1 area under the curve from 0–4 h (AUC0–4). Time to first and rate of moderate/severe exacerbations were assessed.BFF MDI 320/10 µg improved pre-dose trough FEV1versus FF MDI (least squares mean (LSM) 39 mL; p=0.0018), and BFF MDI 320/10 µg and 160/10 µg improved FEV1 AUC0–4versus BD MDI (LSM 173 mL and 157 mL, respectively; both p<0.0001) at week 24. BFF MDI 320/10 µg and 160/10 µg improved time to first and rate of moderate/severe exacerbations versus FF MDI. Treatments were well tolerated, with pneumonia incidence ranging from 0.5–1.4%.BFF MDI improved lung function versus monocomponents and exacerbations versus FF MDI in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

scholarly journals Preventing clinically important deterioration with single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 00047-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Naya ◽  
Chris Compton ◽  
Afisi S. Ismaila ◽  
Ruby Birk ◽  
Noushin Brealey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Clinically Important Deterioration ◽  
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire

Clinically important deterioration (CID) is a novel composite end-point (lung function, health status, exacerbations) for assessing disease stability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).We prospectively analysed CID in the FULFIL study. FULFIL (ClinicalTrials.govNCT02345161; randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study) compared 24 weeks of once daily, single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 µg with twice daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) 400/12 μg in patients aged ≥40 years with symptomatic advanced COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease group D). A subset of patients received study treatment for up to 52 weeks. Time to first CID event was assessed over 24 and 52 weeks using two approaches for the health status component: St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and COPD assessment test. FF/UMEC/VI significantly reduced the risk of a first CID event by 47–52% versus BUD/FOR in the 24- and 52-week populations using both CID definitions (p<0.001).The median time to first CID event was ≥169 days and ≤31 days with FF/UMEC/VI and BUD/FOR, respectively. Only stable patients with no CID at 24 weeks demonstrated sustained clinically important improvements in lung function and health status at 52 weeks versus those who had experienced CID.Once daily, single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI significantly reduced the risk of CID versus twice daily BUD/FOR with a five-fold longer period without deterioration.

scholarly journals INSTEAD: a randomised switch trial of indacaterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate COPD

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1548-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Rossi ◽  
Thys van der Molen ◽  
Ricardo del Olmo ◽  
Alberto Papi ◽  
Luis Wehbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Copd Exacerbation ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Parallel Group

The Indacaterol: Switching Non-exacerbating Patients with Moderate COPD From Salmeterol/Fluticasone to Indacaterol (INSTEAD) study investigated the effect of switching patients at low risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations from salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC; inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimen) to indacaterol monotherapy (non-ICS regimen).This 26-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase IV study, randomised 581 patients with moderate COPD to indacaterol 150 μg once daily or SFC 50/500 μg twice daily. Patients had been receiving SFC 50/500 μg for ≥3 months, with no COPD exacerbations for more than a year before the study (patients for whom ICS is not recommended). The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of indacaterol to SFC, measured by trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after 12 weeks (non-inferiority margin of 0.06 L).The primary objective was met, with a mean treatment difference of 9 mL (95% CI -45–26 mL). There were no significant differences between treatments in terms of breathlessness (transition dyspnoea index) or health status (Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire) at weeks 12 or 26, or rescue medication use or COPD exacerbation rates over 26 weeks. Safety profiles of both treatments were as expected.This study demonstrated that patients with moderate COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year can be switched from SFC to indacaterol 150 μg with no efficacy loss.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone: a phase 3 COPD study

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1030-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Vogelmeier ◽  
Pier Luigi Paggiaro ◽  
Jordi Dorca ◽  
Pawel Sliwinski ◽  
Marcel Mallet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire ◽  
Exacerbation Risk

The efficacy and safety of twice-daily aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate was compared with that of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in patients with stable, moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).AFFIRM COPD (Aclidinium and Formoterol Findings in Respiratory Medicine COPD) was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study. Patients were randomised (1:1) to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg twice-daily via Genuair/Pressair or salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 µg twice-daily via Accuhaler. The primary end-point was peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 24. Other end-points included Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24, TDI and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) responders, COPD Assessment Test and SGRQ scores, assessment of COPD symptoms and exacerbations, use of reliever medication, and device preference. Adverse events were monitored throughout.In total, 933 patients were eligible (mean age 63.4 years, 65.1% male). Aclidinium/formoterol was superior to salmeterol/fluticasone in peak FEV1 and noninferior in TDI. Health status and reduction in exacerbation risk were similar in both groups. While both treatments were well tolerated, pneumonia occurred less frequently with aclidinium/formoterol than salmeterol/fluticasone.In stable COPD, aclidinium/formoterol significantly improved bronchodilation versus salmeterol/fluticasone, with equivalent benefits in symptom control and reduction in exacerbation risk. Both treatments were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events were less common with aclidinium/formoterol.

scholarly journals Faster Onset of Bronchodilation with Formoterol than with Salmeterol in Patients with Stable, Moderate-Severe Copd: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kottakis ◽  
Giovanni Della Cioppa ◽  
Jacques Creemers ◽  
Louis Greefhorst ◽  
Violette Leclerc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Percentage Change ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Dry Powder ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Severe Copd ◽  
Formoterol Fumarate

OBJECTIVES: To compare the onset and magnitude of bronchodilation after dry powder inhalations of formoterol fumarate (Foradil Aerolizer) versus salmeterol xinofoate (Serevent Diskus) with respect to normalized (*) forced expiratory volume in 1 s area under the curve 0 to 1 h after inhalation (FEV1AUC*0-1 h).DESIGN: A double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, randomized, placebo controlled, single-dose, five-period crossover study.SETTING: Five centres in four countries -- one centre each in France, Greece and Italy, and two centres in the Netherlands.PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients aged 42 to 80 years (mean age 63.5 years) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) stage II and III, and mean baseline FEV11.17 L (range 0.56 to 1.77 L).INTERVENTIONS: Patients inhaled single doses of formoterol dry powder (12 and 24 μg), single doses of salmeterol (50 and 100 μg) and matching placebo on five separate days.MAIN RESULTS: The estimates of treatment difference in absolute terms (0.086 L) and percentage change from predose baseline (7.8%) for the primary end point, FEV1AUC*0-1 h, showed that formoterol 12 μg was statistically significantly superior to salmeterol 50 μg (P=0.0044 and P=0.0021, respectively). In addition, both doses of formoterol were statistically superior to placebo for both absolute improvement and percentage change (P=0.0001). The analysis of secondary variables also confirmed the superiority of formoterol over salmeterol.CONCLUSIONS: Formoterol is associated with a faster onset of bronchodilation than salmeterol in patients with COPD.

scholarly journals Validation of Clinical Characteristics and Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in a COPD Population with Discrepancy between Exercise Tolerance and FEV1

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Jun Horie ◽  
Koichiro Takahashi ◽  
Shuuichi Shiranita ◽  
Kunihiko Anami ◽  
Shinichiro Hayashi
Keyword(s):  
Gait Speed ◽  
Pulmonary Rehabilitation ◽  
Exercise Tolerance ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire ◽  
History Of

This study’s objective was to examine the characteristics of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presenting with various exercise tolerance levels. A total of 235 patients with stable COPD were classified into 4 groups: (1) LoFlo + HiEx—patients with a six-minute walking distance (6MWD) ≥350 m and percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%FEV1.0) <50%; (2) HiFlo + HiEx—patients with a 6MWD ≥350 m and a %FEV1.0 ≥50%; (3) LoFlo + LoEx—patients with a 6MWD < 350 m and %FEV1.0 < 50%; and (4) HiFlo + LoEx—patients with a 6MWD <350 m and %FEV1.0 ≥ 50%. Aspects of physical ability in the HiFlo + LoEx group were significantly lower than those in the HiFlo + HiEx group. The HiFlo + LoEx group was characterized by a history of hospitalization for respiratory illness within the past year, treatment with at-home oxygen therapy, and lacking daily exercise habits. Following three months of pulmonary rehabilitation, the LoFlo + HiEx group significantly improved in the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score, maximum gait speed, and 6MWD, while the HiFlo + LoEx group significantly improved in the percentage of maximal expiratory pressure, maximum gait speed, 6MWD, incremental shuttle walking distance, and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score. The HiFlo + LoEx group had the greatest effect of three-month pulmonary rehabilitation compared to other groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document