Personalised prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial

Author(s):  
Anael Barberan-Garcia ◽  
Marta Ubre ◽  
Josep Roca ◽  
Antonio M Lacy ◽  
Felip Burgos ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e034892
Author(s):  
Rachel E Harris ◽  
Marina Aloi ◽  
Lissy de Ridder ◽  
Nicholas M Croft ◽  
Sibylle Koletzko ◽  
...  

IntroductionImmunomodulators such as thiopurines (azathioprine (AZA)/6-mercaptopurine (6MP)), methotrexate (MTX) and biologics such as adalimumab (ADA) are well established for maintenance of remission within paediatric Crohn’s disease (CD). It remains unclear, however, which maintenance medication should be used first line in specific patient groups.AimsTo compare the efficacy of maintenance therapies in newly diagnosed CD based on stratification into high and low-risk groups for severe CD evolution; MTX versus AZA/6MP in low-risk and MTX versus ADA in high-risk patients. Primary end point: sustained remission at 12 months (weighted paediatric CD activity index ≤12.5 and C reactive protein ≤1.5 fold upper limit) without relapse or ongoing requirement for exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN)/steroids 12 weeks after treatment initiation.Methods and analysisREDUCE-RISK in CD is an international multicentre open-label prospective randomised controlled trial funded by EU within the Horizon2020 framework (grant number 668023). Eligible patients (aged 6–17 years, new-onset disease receiving steroids or EEN for induction of remission for luminal ± perianal CD are stratified into low and high-risk groups based on phenotype and response to induction therapy. Participants are randomised to one of two treatment arms within their risk group: low-risk patients to weekly subcutaneous MTX or daily oral AZA/6MP, and high-risk patients to weekly subcutaneous MTX or fortnightly ADA. Patients are followed up for 12 months at prespecified intervals. Electronic case report forms are completed prospectively. The study aims to recruit 312 participants (176 low risk; 136 high risk).Ethics and disseminationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (NCT02852694), authorisation and approval from local ethics committees have been obtained prior to recruitment. Individual informed consent will be obtained prior to participation in the study. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal with open access.Trial registration numberNCT02852694; Pre-results.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB142 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. East ◽  
Noriko Suzuki ◽  
Thomas Guenther ◽  
Nicola Palmer ◽  
Ana Ignjatovic ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. e13 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Selak ◽  
C. Elley ◽  
S. Crengle ◽  
A. Wadham ◽  
N. Rafter ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 181 (S43) ◽  
pp. s78-s84 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Morrison ◽  
R. P. Bentall ◽  
P. French ◽  
L. Walford ◽  
A. Kilcommons ◽  
...  

BackgroundThere is interest in the possibility of indicated prevention of psychosis. There is a strong case for using psychological approaches to prevent transition to psychosis in high-risk patients.AimsTo identify individuals at high risk of transition to psychosis, and psychological characteristics relevant to the development of psychosis in this group.MethodThe design of a randomised controlled trial of cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at high risk (meeting operational criteria of brief or attenuated psychotic symptoms, or first-degree family history with functional decline) is outlined. The first patients recruited are compared with non-patient samples on cognitive and personality factors; an interim analysis of transition rate is reported.ResultsCases (n=31) were recruited mainly from primary care. Of the 23 high-risk patients monitored for 6–12 months, 5 (22%) made the transition to psychosis. The high-risk group scored significantly higher than non-patients on measures of schizotypy, metacognitive beliefs and dysfunctional self-schemas (sociotropy).ConclusionsThe findings validate the methods of identifying individuals at high risk of experiencing a psychotic episode. Compared with non-patient controls, the cases showed dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and self-schemas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document