Clinically meaningful improvements with reslizumab in patient-reported outcomes and lung function in a sub-population defined by the EU indication with ≥3 exacerbations

Author(s):  
Leif Bjermer ◽  
Margaret Garin ◽  
Shawn X. Sun
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 00004-2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Brusselle ◽  
Janice Canvin ◽  
Sivan Weiss ◽  
Shawn X. Sun ◽  
Roland Buhl

Reslizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, significantly reduces exacerbation frequency and improves lung function, asthma control and quality of life in adults with severe eosinophilic asthma, as demonstrated in Phase III studies.This secondary analysis assessed reslizumab's efficacy in patients receiving baseline treatment per Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Step 4 and Step 5 guidelines.Pooled data from duplicate, Phase III, reslizumab versus placebo studies in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (blood eosinophils ≥400 cells·µL−1) were stratified by baseline therapy. Efficacy assessments were exacerbation rates and changes from baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and patient-reported outcomes.Of 953 patients, 69% (n=657) and 11% (n=106) were receiving Step 4 and Step 5 therapy, respectively. Compared with placebo, reslizumab reduced exacerbation rates by 53% (95% CI 0.36–0.62) and 72% (95% CI 0.15–0.52), in Step 4 and Step 5 groups respectively. By study end, reslizumab increased FEV1 in Step 4 and Step 5 groups by 103 mL (95% CI 52–154 mL) and 237 mL (95% CI 68–407 mL), respectively. Reslizumab also improved patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo in both groups.Reslizumab reduces exacerbation rates and improves lung function and patient-reported outcomes in patients with eosinophilic asthma receiving therapy per Steps 4 and 5 of the GINA guidelines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1106.1-1106
Author(s):  
F. Danzo ◽  
K. Gjeloshi ◽  
G. Abignano ◽  
A. M. Dean ◽  
F. Masini ◽  
...  

Background:Lung involvement is very common is systemic sclerosis (SSc). Approximately one quarter of patients develops pulmonary problems within the first 3 years of diagnosis and still represents the leading cause of death in these patients. In a recent clinical trail, the reduction of FVC was not accompanied by a benefit with respect to health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).Objectives:To assess how the change in Pulmonary Function Test (PFTs) parameters correlates with the Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in an observational cohort of patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc).Methods:We conducted a retrospective study of 330 clinic episodes from 121 unselected patients diagnosed with systemic sclerosis according to EULAR/ACR 2013 criteria, in annual follow-up (for a total of 165 patients/year) with PFTs, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (sHAQ), Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (Borg) and Cochin Hand Function Score (CHFS). We assessed the correlation between the HAQ and the Visual Analogical Scale 1-7 at baseline (VAS1 pain, VAS2 disease severity, VAS3 arthritis activity, VAS4 intestinal problems, VAS5 dyspnea, VAS6 Raynaud’s phenomenon, VAS7 digital ulcers). We evaluated the correlation of PFTs with PROs at every time period and the correlation between the change of PFTs parameters (δFVC, δDLCO) with the change of the PROs over a year of follow-up. Following analysis of distribution, Spearman or Pearson Test were used to determine correlation coefficients, as appropiate (Prism 7).Results:The median disease duration was 5 years (IQR 3-10). The median of 12 months δFVC% and δDLCO% were 0 (IQR -5.81 to 3.28) and -2.439 (IQR -8.76 to 5.98), respectively. The analysis evidenced a strong positive correlation between VAS1-7 and HAQ. We observed also significant correlation between FVC%, DLCO% and HAQ-DI (r= - 0.355 and -0.266, respectively; p<0.0001 for both), Borg (r= -0.403 and -0.379, respectively; p<0.0001) and CHFS (r = -0.355 and -0.256, respectively; p<0.0001). Nevertheless, in longitudinal setting there was no significant correlation between δPROs and changes lung function, as continuous variables, neither there was any significant PROs difference in patients that did or did not lose more than 10% of FVC and DLCO over a year of follow-up.Conclusion:This analysis of a monocentric non-selected population evidenced that the current commonly used PROs in SSc while showing a good correlation with lung function are poorly sensitive to change or to reflect changes in lung function over 12 months. In this sense, prudent interpretation of the lack of correlation between FVC and patient-reported outcomes in studies of phase 3 is warranted.References:[1]Rahimi S., Nintedanib for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, Lancet Respiratory Medicine (2020)Disclosure of Interests:None declared


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. e0185019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Lodin ◽  
Mats Lekander ◽  
Jörgen Syk ◽  
Kjell Alving ◽  
Predrag Petrovic ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document