Quality of structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association: a 10-year follow-up study

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho-lun Wong ◽  
Don Truong ◽  
Anisah Mahamed ◽  
Christine Davidian ◽  
Zeeshan Rana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
Canadian Medical Association Journal ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Follow Up Study

scholarly journals The Top 5 Papers of 2016-2017 for General Internists

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieran Lewis Quinn ◽  
Emily Hughes ◽  
Amol A Verma
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
Canadian Society ◽  
General Internists ◽  
Medicine Journal

Each year, the Canadian Society for Internal Medicine (CSIM) Annual Meeting features a presentation of the “Top 5 Papers” in internal medicine (IM). We reviewed the publications in all major IM journals ( New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal, and JAMA Internal Medicine ) between November 2016 and October 2017 to identify 5 papers that we felt were particularly influential and important to practicing clinicians. These articles were all discussed on the free weekly podcast that we produce, The Rounds Table ( http://healthydebate.ca/about-us/the-rounds-table ). This article summarizes these “Top 5” papers.  

scholarly journals Journal Watch

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
Joe Wileman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Journal Watch

Journals were reviewed between August and December 2010. The journals reviewed include: The lancet, Lancet Neurology, New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal, Heart, Gut, Thorax, Circulation, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), American Journal of Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine, and Annals of Internal Medicine. The articles chosen are those which have particular relevance to Acute Physicians.

scholarly journals Journal Watch

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-98
Author(s):  
Phillip Cockrell ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Hospital Infection ◽  
Journal Watch

Journals were reviewed between January and April 2011. The journals reviewed include: American Journal of Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal, Gut, Heart, Journal of Hospital Infection, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The Lancet, Lancet Neurology, New England Journal of Medicine and Thorax. The articles chosen are those which were felt to have particular relevance to Acute Physicians.

scholarly journals Should all papers be published in English?

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Fenner
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Official Journal ◽  
German Medical Association

The Deutsche ??rzteblatt is the official journal of the German Medical Association, just as the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Starting January 21, ...

scholarly journals COVID-19 en Panamá y el Mundo: Una Revisión

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 37-60
Author(s):  
René de Jesús Rivera Gutiérrez ◽  
María Ramírez ◽  
Alicia Rodríguez ◽  
Jorge Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Medicine Journal ◽  
Distribución Geográfica

Antecedentes: El virus SARS-CoV-2, causante de la Enfermedad por Coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) emergió en Wuhan, China, en diciembre de 2019, y tiene un alcance pandémico en la actualidad. Su fisiopatología, distribución geográfica y características clínicas son objetivo de estudio y análisis continuo, con resultados prometedores e influyentes, pero difíciles de reunir y sintetizar considerando las numerosas fuentes de información y el dinamismo de la curva epidemiológica de esta pandemia. Objetivo: Esta revisión tiene como objetivo sintetizar la literatura actual sobre la pandemia del COVID-19, con el propósito de establecer de forma transparente y concisa la información de origen nacional e internacional disponible, de manera que esta sirva como una fuente confiable de la evidencia publicada.  Diseño: Se utilizaron artículos científicos publicados entre diciembre de 2019 y marzo de 2020, que fueron seleccionados por su relevancia, validez y calidad de contenido, obtenidos a través de revistas científicas como New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet y el British Medical Journal, además de la información proporcionada por instituciones reconocidas a nivel mundial, como lo son la Organización Mundial de la Salud y  el Centro para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades. Conclusiones: La información actual sobre la pandemia del SARS-CoV-2 está renovándose continuamente y se espera que continúe haciéndolo por los próximos meses. Se torna complicado el mantenerse a la vanguardia, por lo cual confiamos en que esta revisión será útil para distintos estudiantes y profesionales de la salud.

scholarly journals O papel do exercício físico no tratamento da enxaqueca: qual a evidência?

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-576
Author(s):  
Maria João Coelho ◽  
◽  
Daniela Pereira ◽  
Filipa Paraíso ◽  
Tiago Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Migraine Disorders ◽  
De Se ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Objetivo: Determinar a evidência do efeito do exercício aeróbico no controlo das crises de enxaqueca. Fontes de dados: PubMed, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), The Cochrane Library, British Medical Journal (BMJ), Canadian Medical Association Infobase e Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Métodos: Foram pesquisados artigos de revisão sistemática (RS)‌, ‌meta-análise‌s (MA) e normas de orientação clínica (NOC), ‌em‌ ‌português‌‌, inglês e espanhol,‌ ‌sem‌ ‌limite‌ ‌de‌ ‌data‌ ‌de‌ ‌publicação,‌ ‌utilizando‌ ‌os termos MeSH ‌migraine disorders e exercise.‌ ‌Foram‌ ‌também‌ ‌pesquisados‌ ‌estudos originais (EO) ‌publicados‌ ‌nos‌ ‌últimos‌ ‌cinco‌ ‌anos.‌ ‌Incluíram-se‌ ‌os‌ ‌artigos‌ ‌que‌ ‌avaliavam‌ o efeito do exercício aeróbico na frequência, duração e intensidade das crises de enxaqueca. A‌ ‌atribuição‌ ‌do‌ ‌nível‌ ‌de‌ ‌evidência‌ ‌(NE)‌ ‌e‌ ‌força‌ ‌de‌ ‌recomendação‌ ‌(FR)‌ ‌foi‌ ‌realizada‌ ‌com‌ ‌base‌ ‌na‌ ‌escala‌ ‌Strength of Recommendation‌ ‌Taxonomy‌ ‌(SORT),‌ ‌da‌ ‌American‌ ‌Academy of Family‌ ‌Physicians.‌ Resultados: Da pesquisa efetuada obtiveram-se 69 artigos, tendo sido selecionados seis que cumpriam os critérios de inclusão: três RS com MA, uma RS e dois EO. Todos os artigos apresentaram NE 2. A maioria dos estudos incluídos favorece a prática de exercício físico como medida profilática das crises de enxaqueca; contudo, apresentam amostras pequenas, curtos períodos de intervenção e de follow-up e intervenções heterogéneas. Conclusão: Apesar de se considerar necessária a realização de mais ensaios clínicos para definir concretamente os efeitos a curto e longo prazo do exercício aeróbico na enxaqueca conclui-se que é possível recomendar a sua inclusão na abordagem profilática destes doentes (FR B).

scholarly journals Journal Watch January – May 2013

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-118
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Clayton ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Journal Watch

In this article I have reviewed 4 articles of interest to acute physicians from literature covering the period January to May 2013 in the New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association and the Lancet.

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT’S DUE: GUIDELINES ON AUTHORSHIP

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-344
Author(s):  
F. Katharina Reichelt ◽  
Ian A James ◽  
Derek L. Milne
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Clinical Psychologists

The thorny issue of inappropriate authorship is a well recognized problem in research (Epstein, 1993). Recent editorials and articles in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Lancet and Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) have raised its profile amongst our medical colleagues. The current authors feel that clinical psychologists, nurses and other mental health professionals need to be more aware of the complexities of the area. Hence this paper intends to clarify the major concerns regarding proper accreditation and gives some recommendations and guidelines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document