scholarly journals Oral cancer prognosis based on clinicopathologic and genomic markers using a hybrid of feature selection and machine learning methods

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siow-Wee Chang ◽  
Sameem Abdul-Kareem ◽  
Amir Feisal Merican ◽  
Rosnah Binti Zain
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Genomic Markers

Gene Identification from Microarray Data for Diagnosis of Acute Myeloid and Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using a Sparse Gene Selection Method

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razieh Sheikhpour ◽  
Roohallah Fazli ◽  
Sanaz Mehrabani
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Microarray Data ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Feature Selection Method ◽  
Selection Method ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Sparse Feature Selection

Background: Microarray experiments can simultaneously determine the expression of thousands of genes. Identification of potential genes from microarray data for diagnosis of cancer is important. This study aimed to identify genes for the diagnosis of acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia using a sparse feature selection method. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, the expression of 7129 genes of 25 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 47 patients with lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) achieved by the microarray technology were used in this study. Then, the important genes were identified using a sparse feature selection method to diagnose AML and ALL tissues based on the machine learning methods such as support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian kernel density estimation based classifier (GKDEC), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and linear discriminant classifier (LDC). Results: Diagnosis of ALL and AML was done with the accuracy of 100% using 8 genes of microarray data selected by the sparse feature selection method, GKDEC, and LDC. Moreover, the KNN classifier using 6 genes and the SVM classifier using 7 genes diagnosed AML and ALL with the accuracy of 91.18% and 94.12%, respectively. The gene with the description “Paired-box protein PAX2 (PAX2) gene, exon 11 and complete CDs” was determined as the most important gene in the diagnosis of ALL and AML. Conclusion: The experimental results of the current study showed that AML and ALL can be diagnosed with high accuracy using sparse feature selection and machine learning methods. It seems that the investigation of the expression of selected genes in this study can be helpful in the diagnosis of ALL and AML.

scholarly journals Applications of Machine Learning in Cancer Prediction and Prognosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 117693510600200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Cruz ◽  
David S. Wishart
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Optimization Techniques ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Complex Data ◽  
Protein Biomarkers ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Cancer Prediction ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Complex Data Sets

Machine learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that employs a variety of statistical, probabilistic and optimization techniques that allows computers to “learn” from past examples and to detect hard-to-discern patterns from large, noisy or complex data sets. This capability is particularly well-suited to medical applications, especially those that depend on complex proteomic and genomic measurements. As a result, machine learning is frequently used in cancer diagnosis and detection. More recently machine learning has been applied to cancer prognosis and prediction. This latter approach is particularly interesting as it is part of a growing trend towards personalized, predictive medicine. In assembling this review we conducted a broad survey of the different types of machine learning methods being used, the types of data being integrated and the performance of these methods in cancer prediction and prognosis. A number of trends are noted, including a growing dependence on protein biomarkers and microarray data, a strong bias towards applications in prostate and breast cancer, and a heavy reliance on “older” technologies such artificial neural networks (ANNs) instead of more recently developed or more easily interpretable machine learning methods. A number of published studies also appear to lack an appropriate level of validation or testing. Among the better designed and validated studies it is clear that machine learning methods can be used to substantially (15–25%) improve the accuracy of predicting cancer susceptibility, recurrence and mortality. At a more fundamental level, it is also evident that machine learning is also helping to improve our basic understanding of cancer development and progression.

scholarly journals Autism Spectrum Disorder Studies Using fMRI Data and Machine Learning: A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meijie Liu ◽  
Baojuan Li ◽  
Dewen Hu
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Autism Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Data Exchange ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Fmri Data ◽  
Selection Methods ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

Machine learning methods have been frequently applied in the field of cognitive neuroscience in the last decade. A great deal of attention has been attracted to introduce machine learning methods to study the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in order to find out its neurophysiological underpinnings. In this paper, we presented a comprehensive review about the previous studies since 2011, which applied machine learning methods to analyze the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of autistic individuals and the typical controls (TCs). The all-round process was covered, including feature construction from raw fMRI data, feature selection methods, machine learning methods, factors for high classification accuracy, and critical conclusions. Applying different machine learning methods and fMRI data acquired from different sites, classification accuracies were obtained ranging from 48.3% up to 97%, and informative brain regions and networks were located. Through thorough analysis, high classification accuracies were found to usually occur in the studies which involved task-based fMRI data, single dataset for some selection principle, effective feature selection methods, or advanced machine learning methods. Advanced deep learning together with the multi-site Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) dataset became research trends especially in the recent 4 years. In the future, advanced feature selection and machine learning methods combined with multi-site dataset or easily operated task-based fMRI data may appear to have the potentiality to serve as a promising diagnostic tool for ASD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document