scholarly journals Predictors of mother and child DNA yields in buccal cell samples collected in pediatric cancer epidemiologic studies: a report from the Children’s Oncology group

BMC Genetics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny N Poynter ◽  
Julie A Ross ◽  
Anthony J Hooten ◽  
Erica Langer ◽  
Crystal Blommer ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 516-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Johansen ◽  
John Kuttesch ◽  
W. Archie Bleyer ◽  
Mark Krailo ◽  
Matthew Ames ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1297-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puja G. Whitlow ◽  
Mae Caparas ◽  
Patricia Cullen ◽  
Christine Trask ◽  
Fiona Schulte ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 1905-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Ehrlich ◽  
Thomas E. Hamilton ◽  
Kenneth Gow ◽  
Douglas Barnhart ◽  
Fernando Ferrer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gregory H. Reaman

Overview: In March 2000, the four legacy pediatric cooperative groups officially merged to become the Children's Oncology Group (COG). This was accomplished by the ratification of a new constitution by the respective executive committees and voting membership of the four legacy groups. The actual merger was preceded by a 12 to 18 month period of planning, negotiation, and transition, overseen by a Transition Committee of select executive leadership under the direction of the four current chairs of the existing pediatric groups. Despite the constant threat of budget reductions and questions related to the judicious use of National Cancer Institute (NCI) funds to support four pediatric groups when “children constitute only 3% of the US cancer problem,” the decision to unify was initiated and driven internally. The merger was envisioned as an opportunity to create efficiency by reducing duplicative systems and processes, which was becoming increasingly apparent as more planned clinical trials required intergroup collaboration. It was also recognized that such intergroup efforts would become more of a reality as clinical trial paradigms were built on risk-adjusted approaches. Clinically, biologically, and molecularly defined homogeneous subgroups of patients were of insufficient sample size within each group to design and conduct studies within a reasonable time frame. In essence, this merger was motivated by an overwhelming sense of necessity to preserve our mission of defining and delivering compassionate and state-of-the-art care through scientific discovery. The merger process itself was challenging, time consuming, not supported by any supplemental funding, and at times painful. What has emerged as a result is the largest pediatric cancer research organization in the world. Accomplishments in epidemiology, biology, translational science, and improved clinical outcomes for some pediatric cancers would have never been achieved without the merger. The very fact that outcome improvements were not realized in every type of pediatric cancer is testimony to the commitment of the COG membership to continue to look and move forward.


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan D. Voss ◽  
Julia Glade-Bender ◽  
Sheri L. Spunt ◽  
Steven G. DuBois ◽  
Brigitte C. Widemann ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Bitsko ◽  
Debra Cohen ◽  
Robyn Dillon ◽  
Jeanne Harvey ◽  
Kevin Krull ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document