scholarly journals Surgical protocol violations in children with renal tumors provides an opportunity to improve pediatric cancer care: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 1905-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Ehrlich ◽  
Thomas E. Hamilton ◽  
Kenneth Gow ◽  
Douglas Barnhart ◽  
Fernando Ferrer ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 67s-67s
Author(s):  
M.T. Kutluk ◽  
M.A. Yeşilipek

Background: Each year more than 200,000 new cancer cases are expected in children & adolescents aged 0-14 years at global level. Although the long term survival rates have been improved to 85% in high income countries, it is still lower than this LMICs with a wide range around the world. Pediatric registries are critical for planning for pediatric cancer care. This study summarizes the update of pediatric cancer registry in Turkey. Aim: To analyze the pediatric cancer distribution through Turkish Pediatric Cancer Registry for the years of 2009-2017. Method: Turkish Pediatric Oncology Group and Turkish Pediatric Hematology Association established a Web based cancer registry in Turkey in 2002. The registry information for 2002-2008 was presented earlier. This study, now, is presents the distribution of pediatric cancers for the years of 2009-2017. International Childhood Classification System was used in classification. Basic demographic findings, ICD-O-3 morphology & topography codes were recorded for each cases. This is an update of the Turkish Pediatric Cancer Registry. Results: During the 9 years from 2009 to 2017, 14,769 pediatric cancer cases were recorded. For all cases, median age was 6.7 years (0-17 M/F 8318/6443, 3 hermaphrodite 5 unknown). Age distribution was 0-4 yrs, 40.8%; 5-9 yrs, 24.5%; 10-14 yrs, 23.3%; 15-19 yrs, 11.4%. The distribution of tumor types were [number of cases, percentage of total, median age years, M/F]: leukemia (4114, 27.9%, 5.5, 2366/1748); lymphoma and other RES tumors (2823, 19.1%, 9.6, 1904/914, 1 hermaphrodite 4 unknown); CNS [brain & spinal] (1950, 13.2%, 7.1, 1072/828); sympathetic system (1166, 7.9%, 2.4, 609/557); retinoblastoma (351, 2.4%, 1.4, 197/154); renal (736, 5.0%, 3.3, 345/391); liver (242, 1.6%, 1.8, 132/110); malignant bone (965, 6.5%, 12.6, 527/438); soft tissue sarcomas (991, 6.7%, 7.4, 580/411); germ cell (911, 6.2%, 8.2, 331/577, 2 hermaphrodite, 1 unknown); carcinoma and other malignant epithelial (436, 3.0%, 13.6, 212/224); other/nonspecific malignant (84, 0.6%, 7.1, 43/41) tumors. Five year survival rate was found as 67.8%. Conclusion: Registry provides the essential information for planning the pediatric cancer care. This registry became a critical source for health care professionals in Turkey since beginning. Survival rates for children increased to 67.8% based on this study. This is compatible with the survival rates from other upper middle income countries. This data also allows the comparison of the national data with the national and international studies. Investment on the pediatric cancer registry is one of the first steps of investments on pediatric cancer care.


2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00958
Author(s):  
Lindsay A. Jibb ◽  
Julie Chartrand ◽  
Tatenda Masama ◽  
Donna L. Johnston

PURPOSE: Although the hospital remains the dominant site for delivering most pediatric cancer care, home-based care is increasingly provided. To effectively deliver comprehensive, relevant, and acceptable care in children's homes, the voices of these key informants must be considered. We examined the views of children with cancer, their family caregivers, and clinicians on home-based cancer care to identify necessary strategies to improve the delivery of care. METHODS: Children with cancer, their family caregivers, and multiprofessional clinicians who provide care at a tertiary pediatric care center or in the community participated in audio-recorded, semistructured interviews in French and English. Interviews were conducted until data saturation in each participant group was achieved. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen children, 20 family caregivers, and 22 clinicians participated. Home-based care was endorsed as a means to improve child health-, family social- and financial-, and system-level outcomes. The success of a home-based model is built on care that addresses child and family informational, treatment and care, material, and psychosocial needs. Mechanisms to improve care include enhanced homecare agency-hospital-family communication, training for homecare nurses in pediatric cancer care, virtual solutions, and an expanded breadth of services provided in-home. Child-, family-, and system-related factors affect the delivery of optimal home-based care. CONCLUSION: Children, families, and clinicians value a model of pediatric cancer care that incorporates home-based services. The insights of these key informants should be reflected in the principles that become the basis of home-based cancer care best practices.


BMC Genetics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny N Poynter ◽  
Julie A Ross ◽  
Anthony J Hooten ◽  
Erica Langer ◽  
Crystal Blommer ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 516-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Johansen ◽  
John Kuttesch ◽  
W. Archie Bleyer ◽  
Mark Krailo ◽  
Matthew Ames ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22022-e22022
Author(s):  
Jennifer Reichek ◽  
Christine B. Weldon ◽  
Rani Ganesan ◽  
Eugene Suh ◽  
Dipti Dighe ◽  
...  

e22022 Background: In 2013, the Institute of Medicine report recommended that supportive oncology services be initiated at time of diagnosis. Providers of pediatric cancer care in the Chicagoland community, supported by The Coleman Foundation, sought to define areas for quality improvement of supportive oncology delivery to children. Methods: Focus groups and surveys with clinicians providing pediatric cancer care and supportive services at 14 sites were used to prioritize areas needing improvement. Results: 100% (14/14) of sites participated. Of the eligible sites, 6 were pediatric cancer treatment sites and 8 cancer care community organizations. Sites demonstrated consistent agreement for 8 of the 12 areas of focus for improvement. Over 50% of sites reported areas of focus (table) as important or very important. Conclusions: Sites identified the need for quality improvement in delivery of psychosocial, survivorship and palliative care for pediatric cancer patients. Survey results demonstrate a need for collaboration and efforts to guide care delivery improvement across sites. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document