scholarly journals Standard or hypofractionated radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of acute skin toxicity and dose inhomogeneities

BMC Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Tortorelli ◽  
Luana Di Murro ◽  
Rosaria Barbarino ◽  
Sara Cicchetti ◽  
Daniela di Cristino ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Budhi Singh Yadav ◽  
Shipra Gupta ◽  
Divya Dahiya ◽  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Arun Oinam

Abstract PurposeTo assess feasibility of accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with volumetric modulated arc technique (VMAT) in patients with breast cancer.Methods Total 27 patients after breast conserving surgery (BCS) were included in this study. Patients were planned on 4-dimensional computerized tomogram (4D-CT) and contouring was done using RTOG guidelines. Dose delivered was 34 Gy/10#/2wk to the breast and 40 Gy/10#/2wk to the tumor bed as SIB with VMAT technique. The primary endpoint was grade 2 acute skin toxicity. Doses to the organs at risk were calculated. Toxicities and cosmesis were assessed using RTOG LENT-SOMA and HARVARD/NSABP/RTOG grading scales, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was calculated with Kaplan Meier curves.ResultsMean age of the patients was 42 years. Left and right breast cancer was seen in 17 (63%) and 10 (37%) patients, respectively. Ipsilateral lung mean V16 and contralateral lung V5 was 16.01% and 3.73%, respectively. Mean heart dose from the left and right breast was 7.25Gy and 4.37Gy, respectively. Mean dose to the contralateral breast, oesophagus and spinal cord was 2.64Gy, 3.69Gy and 3.15Gy, respectively. Thyroid V25 mean was 19.69%.Grade 1 and 2 acute skin toxicity was observed in 9 (33%) and 5 (18.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 2 hyperpigmentation, edema and induration were observed in 1 (3.7%), 2 (7.4%) and 4(14.8%) patients, respectively. Mild breast pain and arm/shoulder discomfort were reported by 1 (3.4%) patient each. Median follow-up was 48 months (range 12-58 months). At 4 years breast induration, edema and fibrosis each were observed in 1(3.7%) patient. Cosmesis was excellent and good in 21 (78%) and 6 (22%) patients, respectively. Local recurrence and distant metastases occurred 1(3.7%) and 2(7.4%) patients, respectively. DFS and OS at 3-years was 88% and 92%, respectively.ConclusionWith this RT schedule acute and late toxicity rates were acceptable with no adverse cosmesis. Local control, DFS and OS were good.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvin Akhter Banu ◽  
Naheed Rukhsana ◽  
MA Jabber ◽  
Motiur Rahman ◽  
Sadiq R Malik

Background: As hypofractionated radiotherapy for post-operative breast cancer patients safe, effective and more convenient, it might be beneficial for patients of developing countries like ours. Objective: This study was done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy in patients who underwent breast conserving surgery and hypofractionated radiation therapy in patients who underwent mastectomy and axillary clearance. Materials and method: This cross sectional study was conducted in Delta Hospital Ltd, Dhaka, Bangladesh, including 50 postoperative patients, (12 patients in Breast Conservation Therapy group and 38 in Post Mastectomy Radiation Therapy group), with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast treated with this hypofractionated radiotherapy protocol during the last 1.5 year. The patients were treated with 3DCRT, LINAC, 6 MV photon and appropriate electron energy. Results: Minimal post treatment acute morbidity was observed. Forty seven patients (94%) had grade-I acute skin toxicity and only 3 patients (6%) developed grade-II acute skin toxicity. Conclusion: Hypofractionated radiotherapy is as safe and effective as conventional fractionated radiotherapy and superior in terms of convenience. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v3i1.22232 Delta Med Col J. Jan 2015; 3(1): 04-08


2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (1055) ◽  
pp. 20150414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoîte Méry ◽  
Alexis Vallard ◽  
Jane-Chloé Trone ◽  
Cécile Pacaut ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Guy ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huayong Jiang ◽  
Lingling Meng ◽  
Huijuan Zhang ◽  
Xiangkun Dai ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) with a dose of 36.5 Gy in 10 fractions in postmastectomy patients. Methods From March 2014 to December 2015, 85 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were eligible to participate in this study with a schedule of 36.5 Gy in 10 fractions. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was delivered to the chest wall with or without the supraclavicular region. The primary endpoint was radiation-related toxicities. The secondary endpoints were locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). And the outcomes were compared with our retrospective study of 72 patients with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions. Results The median follow-up was 69.0 (range 66.5-71.5) months in the 36.5 Gy group and 93.0 (range 91.9-94.1) months in the 42.5 Gy group, respectively. Radiation-related toxicities were mainly grade 1, although a few patients had grade 2 plexopathy (1.2%) and acute skin toxicity (1.2%) in the 36.5 Gy group, and grade 2 acute skin toxicity (5.6%) and lymphedema (4.2%) in the 42.5 Gy group. There were no significant differences between the groups in acute and late toxicities. For all the patients, the 5-year LRFFS, DFS and OS were 97.7 and 100.0%, 93.1 and 90.3%, 98.8 and 97.2%, respectively, without significant differences between the groups. Conclusion Postmastectomy HFRT with a schedule of 36.5 Gy in 10 fractions was feasible, with mild toxicities and excellent 5-year clinical outcome. Trial registration Trial registration number: ChiCTR-ONRC-14004391. Date of registration: 9/3/2014.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
pp. S8-S11
Author(s):  
Daniel Sampaio Vieira ◽  
Marcio Lemberg Reisner ◽  
Juliana Depra Panichella ◽  
Isabella Peixoto Barbosa

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (6Part8) ◽  
pp. 2067-2067
Author(s):  
JS Li ◽  
G Freedman ◽  
S Stathakis ◽  
P Anderson ◽  
C-M Ma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document