toxicity scoring
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2136
Author(s):  
Daniel Lin ◽  
Shalini Moningi ◽  
Joseph Abi Jaoude ◽  
Ben S. Singh ◽  
Irina M. Cazacu ◽  
...  

We developed and implemented an objective toxicity scoring system to be used during endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract in order to directly assess changes in toxicity during the radiation treatment of pancreatic cancer. We assessed and validated the upper GI toxicity of 19 locally advanced pancreatic cancer trial patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were used to compare pre- and post-SBRT scores. Comparison of the toxicity scores measured before and after SBRT revealed a mild increase in toxicity in the stomach and duodenum (p < 0.005), with no cases of severe toxicity observed. Kappa and AC1 statistics analysis were used to evaluate interobserver agreement. Our toxicity scoring system was reliable in determining GI toxicity with a good overall interobserver agreement for pre-treatment scores (stomach, κ = 0.71, p < 0.005; duodenum, κ = 0.88, p < 0.005) and post-treatment scores (stomach, κ = 0.71, p < 0.005; duodenum, κ = 0.76, p < 0.005). The AC1 statistics yielded similar results. With future usage, we hope this scoring system will be a useful tool for objectively and reliably assessing changes in GI toxicity during the treatment of pancreatic cancer and for GI toxicity assessments and comparisons during radiation therapy research trials.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 420-420
Author(s):  
Gillian Gresham ◽  
Jasleen Sidhu ◽  
Navraj Malhi ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung

420 Background: Baseline demographics and clinical factors may contribute to a pt’s overall risk for developing chemotherapy-related GI toxicity, such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. We aimed to develop a GI toxicity scoring system to better stratify early CC pts who may be at higher risk of developing GI toxicity from adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. Methods: Pts diagnosed with early CC from 2005 to 2008 and treated with FOLFOX at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were reviewed. GI toxicities of interest included (1) nausea/vomiting, (2) diarrhea, and (3) any GI side effects. Baseline variables that were analyzed consisted of age, sex, ECOG, time to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTAC), and laboratory parameters. Stepwise regression was used to develop a multivariate model for each toxicity and a weighted risk scoring system was subsequently devised based on the magnitude of the parameter estimates in the multivariate model. Results: In total, 475 pts were included: median age was 62 years (range 26-89), 16.2% were aged >70 years, and 54.5% were men. The majority (90.1%) was ECOG 0/1. Independent predictors for nausea/vomiting included age >70 years (OR 2.46, 95%CI 1.3-4.8, p=0.011), GFR <50 (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.1-2.7, p=0.025), and TTAC >8 weeks (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.9-2.1, p=0.14) whereas independent predictors for diarrhea included age >70 years (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.79-2.62, p=0.12) and GFR <50 (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.018). The multivariate model for the risk of any GI toxicity included age >70 years (OR: 2.61, 95% CI 1.1-6.1, p=0.049), GFR <50 (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.0038), and TTAC >8 weeks (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.2-2.7, p=0.0059). Points were assigned: 2 points for long TTAC and poor GFR and 1 point for advanced age. The study cohort was classified into their risk groups based on their score (Table). Conclusions: We developed a simple 5-point scoring system to stratify early CC pts receiving adjuvant FOLFOX into low and high risk groups for GI toxicity based on baseline clinical factors. Further validation of this scoring system is required. [Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Emily Fox ◽  
Karen Barrett-McNeil ◽  
Lift Hiong Khoo ◽  
Mark Middleton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document