scholarly journals Evaluation of DNA ploidy in relation with established prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolas Tsavaris ◽  
Nicolaos Kavantzas ◽  
Kostantinos Tsigritis ◽  
Ioannis D Xynos ◽  
Nikitas Papadoniou ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (11) ◽  
pp. 2589-2596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Krishnan ◽  
Vishal Rana ◽  
Nora A. Janjan ◽  
James L. Abbruzzese ◽  
Morris S. Gould ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 806-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus ◽  
Marcos Pedro Guedes Camandaroba ◽  
Mauro Daniel Spina Donadio ◽  
Audrey Cabral ◽  
Thiago Pimentel Muniz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15796-e15796
Author(s):  
Adarsh Das ◽  
Andrew Peter Dean ◽  
Domenic Higgs

e15796 Background: FOLFIRINOX is well known to be a highly effective treatment in pancreatic cancer for young patients with good performance status. As the original ACCORD study was carried out with patient’s performance status 0 or 1, many oncologists feel uncertain administering modified dose FOLFIRINOX (m-FOLFIRINOX) as a second-line therapy. We have previously reported our experience in 35 patients (aged 27 – 85) where we concluded that m-FOLFIRINOX can be administered safely with appropriate dose reductions. More recently, the systematic review and meta-analysis by Tong et al. concluded that m-FOLFIRINOX is a good choice of therapy even for those with poor performance status. This retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy of m-FOLFIRINOX in second-line treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using an electronic database, patients with either locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified who had received first-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, followed by second-line m-FOLFIRINOX between January 2013 and July 2018. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty-two patients were identified, with 65% of the patients having metastatic pancreatic disease. Median age of patients was 75 (range, 27 – 86). Dose intensity of m-FOLFIRINOX was 65% for oxaliplatin, 68% for irinotecan, 18% for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 68% for infusional 5-FU. From diagnosis, the median OS of all patients was 45.0 months (95% CI, 25.0 – 63.0). The median OS of the locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 63.0 months (95% CI, 45.0 – 70.0) and 22.5 months (95% CI, 18.0, 38.0), respectively. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of m-FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure. These findings correlate with the findings of Tong et al.’s findings of the benefits of m-FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer in patients with poor performance status.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document