scholarly journals Comparison of face-to-face versus email guided self-help for binge eating: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E Jenkins ◽  
Amy Luck ◽  
Alison Burrows ◽  
Nicky Boughton
2002 ◽  
Vol 181 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Palmer ◽  
Helen Birchall ◽  
Lesley Mcgrain ◽  
Victoria Sullivan

BackgroundThere is great potential demand for treatment of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. Skilled therapists are in short supply. Self-help and guided self-help based upon books have shown some promise as an economical alternative to full therapy in some cases.AimsTo investigate the efficacy and effectiveness of self-help with and without guidance in a specialist secondary service.MethodA randomised controlled trial comparing three forms of self-help over 4 months with a waiting-list comparison group and measurement of service consumption over the subsequent 8 months.ResultsSelf-help delivered with four sessions of face-to-face guidance led to improved outcome over 4 months. There is also some evidence to support the use of telephone guidance. A minority of participants achieved lasting remission of their disorder in relation to self-help, but there was no significant difference in final outcome between the groups after they had progressed through the stepped care programme. Patients initially offered guided self-help had a lower long-term drop-out rate.ConclusionsGuided self-help is a worthwhile initial response to bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. It is a treatment that could be delivered in primary care and in other non-specialist settings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. L. Brown ◽  
K. Carswell ◽  
J. Augustinavicius ◽  
A. Adaku ◽  
M. R. Leku ◽  
...  

Background.Exposure to armed conflict and forced displacement constitute significant risks for mental health. Existing evidence-based psychological interventions have limitations for scaling-up in low-resource humanitarian settings. The WHO has developed a guided self-help intervention, Self Help Plus (SH+), which is brief, implemented by non-specialists, and designed to be delivered to people with and without specific mental disorders. This paper outlines the study protocol for an evaluation of the SH+ intervention in northern Uganda, with South Sudanese refugee women.Methods.A two-arm, single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 14 villages in Rhino Camp refugee settlement, with at least 588 women experiencing psychological distress. Villages will be randomly assigned to receive either SH+ with enhanced usual care (EUC), or EUC alone. SH+ is a five-session guided self-help intervention delivered in workshops with audio-recorded materials and accompanying pictorial guide. The primary outcome is reduction in overall psychological distress over time, with 3 months post-treatment as the primary end-point. Secondary outcomes are self-defined psychosocial concerns, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, hazardous alcohol use, feelings of anger, interethnic relations, psychological flexibility, functional impairment and subjective wellbeing. Psychological flexibility is a hypothesised mediator, and past trauma history and intervention attendance will be explored as potential moderators.Discussion.This trial will provide important information on the effectiveness of a scalable, guided self-help intervention for improving psychological health and wellbeing among people affected by adversity.Trial Registration:ISRCTN50148022; registered 13/03/2017.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document