scholarly journals EVALUATION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY SIMULATION-BASED TEAM TRAINING: THE WAY FORWARD FOR TRAINING ICU TEAMS

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A860
Author(s):  
U Pietsch ◽  
H Schneider ◽  
W Schuhwerk
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Melinda J. Cory ◽  
Kiran B. Hebbar ◽  
Nora Colman ◽  
Ashley Pierson ◽  
Shanelle A. Clarke

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e027122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanisha Jowsey ◽  
Peter Beaver ◽  
Jennifer Long ◽  
Ian Civil ◽  
A L Garden ◽  
...  

AimNetworkZ is a simulation-based multidisciplinary team-training programme designed to enhance patient safety by improving communication and teamwork in operating theatres (OTs). In partnership with the Accident Compensation Corporation, its implementation across New Zealand (NZ) began in 2017. Our aim was to explore the experiences of staff – including the challenges they faced – in implementing NetworkZ in NZ hospitals, so that we could improve the processes necessary for subsequent implementation.MethodWe interviewed staff from five hospitals involved in the initial implementation of NetworkZ, using the Organising for Quality model as the framework for analysis. This model describes embedding successful quality improvement as a process of overcoming six universal challenges: structure, infrastructure, politics, culture, motivation and learning.ResultsThirty-one people participated. Structural support within the hospital was considered essential to maintain staff enthusiasm, momentum and to embed the programme. The multidisciplinary, simulation-based approach to team training was deemed a fundamental infrastructure for learning, with participants especially valuing the realistic in situ simulations and educational support. Participants reported positive changes to the OT culture as a result of NetworkZ and this realisation motivated its implementation. In sites with good structural support, NetworkZ implementation proceeded quickly and participants reported rapid cultural change towards improved teamwork and communication in their OTs.ConclusionImplementation challenges exist and strategies to overcome these are informing future implementation of NetworkZ. Embedding the programme as business as usual across a nation requires significant and sustained support at all levels. However, the potential gains in patient safety and workplace culture from widespread multidisciplinary team training are substantial.Trial registration numberACTRN12617000017325.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e032997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Weller ◽  
Jennifer Anne Long ◽  
Peter Beaver ◽  
David Cumin ◽  
Chris Frampton ◽  
...  

IntroductionNetworkZ is a national, insurer-funded multidisciplinary simulation-based team-training programme for all New Zealand surgical teams. NetworkZ is delivered in situ, using full-body commercial simulators integrated with bespoke surgical models. Rolled out nationally over 4 years, the programme builds local capacity through instructor training and provision of simulation resources. We aim to improve surgical patient outcomes by improving teamwork through regular simulation-based multidisciplinary training in all New Zealand hospitals.Methods and analysisOur primary hypothesis is that surgical patient outcomes will improve following NetworkZ. Our secondary hypotheses are that teamwork processes will improve, and treatment injury claims will decline. In addition, we will explore factors that influence implementation and sustainability of NetworkZ and identify organisational changes following its introduction. The study uses a stepped-wedge cluster design. The intervention will roll out at yearly intervals to four cohorts of five District Health Boards. Allocation to cohort was purposive for year 1, and subsequently randomised. The primary outcome measure is Days Alive and Out of Hospital at 90 days using patient data from an existing national administrative database. Secondary outcomes measures will include analysis of postoperative complications and treatment injury claims, surveys of teamwork and safety culture, in-theatre observations and stakeholder interviews.Ethics and disseminationWe believe this is the first surgical team training intervention to be implemented on a national scale, and a unique opportunity to evaluate a nation-wide team-training intervention for healthcare teams. By using a pre-existing large administrative data set, we have the potential to demonstrate a difference to surgical patient outcomes. This will be of interest to those working in the field of healthcare teamwork, quality improvement and patient safety. New Zealand Health and Disability Ethic Committee approval (#16/NTB/143).Trial registration numberAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID ACTRN12617000017325 and the Universal Trial Number is U1111-1189-3992.


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1669-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory McLaughlin ◽  
Wesley Barry ◽  
Erica Barin ◽  
Lynn Kysh ◽  
Marc A. Auerbach ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. e-61032
Author(s):  
Irene Rød ◽  
Ellen Irene Westby Moen ◽  
Solveig Struksnes

2012 ◽  
Vol 538-541 ◽  
pp. 2666-2669
Author(s):  
Yong Huang

In order to get the grid Multi-Scroll in the two directions, based on a simple unstable system, the way of the combination of the translational transform and step function was put forward to make the scrolls extending in the x and y directions in this paper. The quantity of scrolls can be controlled by two parameters N and M. A simulation system was designed with Labview to simulate grid Multi-Scroll chaotic system, it demonstrates the existence of grid Multi-Scroll chaotic attractor.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Gilfoyle ◽  
Deanna Koot ◽  
John Annear ◽  
Farhan Bhanji ◽  
Adam Cheng ◽  
...  

Introduction: Human errors occur during resuscitation despite individual knowledge of resuscitation guidelines. Poor teamwork has been implicated as a major source of such error; therefore interprofessional resuscitation teamwork training is essential. Hypothesis: A one-day team training course for pediatric interprofessional resuscitation team members improves adherence to PALS guidelines, team efficiency and teamwork in a simulated clinical environment. Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted at 4 children’s hospitals in Canada with pediatric resuscitation team members (n=300, 51 teams). Educational intervention was a one-day simulation-based team training course involving interactive lecture, group discussions and 4 simulated resuscitation scenarios followed by debriefing. First scenario of the day was conducted prior to any training. Final scenario of the day was the same scenario, with modified patient history. Scenarios included standardized distractors designed to elicit and challenge specific teamwork behaviors. Primary outcome measure was change (before and after training) in adherence to PALS guidelines, as measured by the Clinical Performance Tool (CPT). Secondary outcome measures: change in times to initiation of chest compressions and defibrillation; and teamwork performance, as measured by the Clinical Teamwork Scale (CTS). Correlation between CPT and CTS scores was analyzed. Results: Teams significantly improved CPT scores (67.3% to 79.6%, P< 0.0001), time to initiation of chest compressions (60.8 sec to 27.1 sec, P<0.0001), time to defibrillation (164.8 sec to 122.0 sec, P<0.0001) and CTS scores (56.0% to 71.8%, P<0.0001). Significantly more teams defibrillated under AHA target of 2 minutes (10 vs. 27, P<0.01). A strong correlation was found between CPT and CTS (r=0.530, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Participation in a simulation-based team training educational intervention significantly improved surrogate measures of clinical performance, time to initiation of key clinical tasks, and teamwork during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A strong correlation between clinical and teamwork performance suggests that effective teamwork optimizes clinical performance of resuscitation teams.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjstel-2020-000685
Author(s):  
John T Paige ◽  
Deborah D Garbee ◽  
Qingzhao Yu ◽  
John Zahmjahn ◽  
Raquel Baroni de Carvalho ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe evidence for the conventional wisdom that debriefing quality determines the effectiveness of learning in simulation-based training is lacking. We investigated whether the quality of debriefing in using simulation-based training in team training correlated with the degree of learning of participants.MethodsForty-two teams of medical and undergraduate nursing students participated in simulation-based training sessions using a two-scenario format with after-action debriefing. Observers rated team performance with an 11-item Teamwork Assessment Scales (TAS) instrument (three subscales, team-based behaviours (5-items), shared mental model (3-items), adaptive communication and response (3-items)). Two independent, blinded raters evaluated video-recorded facilitator team prebriefs and debriefs using the Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) 8-item tool. Descriptive statistics were calculated, t-test comparisons made and multiple linear regression and univariate analysis used to compare OSAD item scores and changes in TAS scores.ResultsStatistically significant improvements in all three TAS subscales occurred from scenario 1 to 2. Seven faculty teams taught learners with all scores ≥3.0 (except two) for prebriefs and all scores ≥3.5 (except one) for debriefs (OSAD rating 1=done poorly to 5=done well). Linear regression analysis revealed a single statistically significant correlation between debrief engagement and adaptive communication and response score without significance on univariate analysis.ConclusionsQuality of debriefing does not seem to increase the degree of learning in interprofessional education using simulation-based training of prelicensure student teams. Such a finding may be due to the relatively high quality of the prebrief and debrief of the faculty teams involved in the training.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document