scholarly journals A comparative study of broccoli sprouts powder and standard triple therapy on cardiovascular risk factors following H.pylori eradication: a randomized clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes

Author(s):  
Parvin Mirmiran ◽  
Zahra Bahadoran ◽  
Mahdieh Golzarand ◽  
Homayoun Zojaji ◽  
Fereidoun Azizi
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengmei Lian ◽  
Jiaxing Tian ◽  
De Jin ◽  
Chunli Piao ◽  
Hailong Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Previous studies have showed that traditional Chinese medicine can regulate glycaemia, bodyweight, lipids, and blood pressure in populations with various different cardiovascular risk factors. Yet no studies have established the benefits of traditional Chinese medicine in patients with type 2 diabetes with dyslipidaemia and abdominal obesity. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the Jiangtangtiaozhi decoction (known as JTTZF), a Chinese herbal medicine, on glycaemia, lipids, and weight variables, compared with metformin. Methods: We did a randomised, multicenter, clinical trial in nine research centres in China. Adult patients (aged 18-70 years old) with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia (defined as triglyceride 1.70-5.65 mmol/L-1) inadequately controlled by diet and exercise were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive JTTZF (30g, twice per day) or metformin (0.25 g, three times a day) for 48 consecutive weeks. Patients were treated with gliclazide sustained-release tablets once per day when their HbA1c was more than 7% after 24 weeks. If their triglyceride was more than 5.65 mmol/L-1, bezafibrate was given twice a day. Patients and clinicians were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 48 of mean HbA1c in each treatment group. Secondary endpoints included lipid concentrations (ie, triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL), waist circumference, bodyweight, and BMI. Analyses were done in the per-protocol population who complied with the protocol and had no violations. Percentages of patients that reached HbA1c targets (<7·0%) and lipid targets (triglyceride <1·7 mmol/L, total cholesterol <5·7 mmol/L) were also assessed. Ethical approval was granted by the Guang’anmen Hospital Medical Ethics Commission in Beijing, China. Informed patient consent was given by all participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01471275.Results: Between Nov 25, 2011, and Jun 27, 2013, we randomly assigned 450 patients to either JTTZF (n=225) or to metformin (n=225). 378 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis (201 patients in the JTTZF group and 177 patients in the metformin group). At week 48, JTTZF reduced mean HbA1c to 7.30% (SD 1.21, -0.94% from baseline) and metformin reduced mean HbA1c to 7.23% (SD 1.15, -1.00% from baseline; p=0.55 for difference between groups). 46% of patients attained the HbA1c goal in the JTTZF group and 41% in the metformin group. Compared with metformin, JTTZF did not significantly reduce mean concentrations of triglycerides (-0.87 mmol/L, SD 2.73 in the JTTZF group vs -0.53 mmol/L, 2.33 in the metformin group; p=0.19), total cholesterol (-0.53 mmol/L, 1.36 vs -0.39 mmol/L, 1.27; p=0.324), LDL (-0.45 mmol/L, 1.00 vs -0.33 mmol/L, 0.82; p=0.204), and HDL (-0.08 mmol/L, 0.43 vs -0.06 mmol/L, 0.27; p=0.54). More patients in the JTTZF than the metformin group reached targets for triglycerides (42% vs 28%, p=0.007) and total cholesterol (78% vs 69%, p=0.047). After 48 weeks, compared with metformin, JTTZF decreased mean waist circumference (-4.15 cm, SD 5.41 vs -2.95 cm, 5.70; p=0.036), bodyweight (-2.72 kg, SD 4.29 vs -1.75 kg, 4.31; p=0.029), and BMI (-0.99 kg/m², SD 1.55 vs -0.62 kg/m², SD 1.59; p=0.021). Serious adverse events were reported in four (2%) of 225 patients in the JTTZF group and in six (3%) of 225 patients in the metformin group. No severe hypoglycaemia was reported in either group.Conclusions: JTTZF showed improvements in several cardiovascular risk factors compared with metformin. JTTZF might be a promising alternative treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471275


Diabetes Care ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1777-1783 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Barnard ◽  
J. Cohen ◽  
D. J.A. Jenkins ◽  
G. Turner-McGrievy ◽  
L. Gloede ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 85-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Duckworth ◽  
Madeline McCarren ◽  
Carlos Abraira ◽  
VADT Investigators

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basilio Pintaudi ◽  
Alessia Scatena ◽  
Gabriella Piscitelli ◽  
Vera Frison ◽  
Salvatore Corrao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently defined cardiovascular risk classes for subjects with diabetes. Aim of this study was to explore the distribution of subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by cardiovascular risk groups according to the ESC classification and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors. Methods The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 Italian diabetes centers participating in the AMD Annals initiative. Patients with T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk. General descriptive indicators, measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated. Results Overall, 473,740 subjects with type 2 diabetes (78.5% at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and 0.6% at moderate risk) were evaluated. Among people with T2D at very high risk: 26.4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors. The use of DPP4-i markedly increased as cardiovascular risk increased. The prescription of secretagogues also increased and that of GLP1-RAs tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i was still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. The overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular risk increased. Conclusions A large proportion of subjects with T2D is at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to their potential advantages in terms of cardiovascular risk reduction. Several actions are necessary to improve the quality of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document