scholarly journals Potential role of jugular vein echographic assessment for central venous pressure estimation

Critical Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P171
Author(s):  
P Balsorano ◽  
S Romagnoli ◽  
A Gaudio
2004 ◽  
Vol 187 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vassilios Smyrniotis ◽  
Georgia Kostopanagiotou ◽  
Kassiani Theodoraki ◽  
Dimitrios Tsantoulas ◽  
John C Contis

2013 ◽  
Vol 162 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Iacoviello ◽  
Agata Puzzovivo ◽  
Francesco Monitillo ◽  
Dea Saulle ◽  
Maria Silvia Lattarulo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ahmed Abd Alrahman Baz ◽  
Amro Abdulrahim Ibrahim ◽  
Hussein Saeed El-Fishawy ◽  
Abo El-Magd Mohamed Al-Bohy

Abstract Background Assessment of the central venous pressure (CVP) is an essential hemodynamic parameter for monitoring the dialyzing patients. Our objective of the present study is to investigate the accuracy of CVP measurement by internal jugular vein US in comparison to the direct measurement by the central venous catheters for hemodialysis patients. We included 106 patients; where their CVP was assessed in two different non invasive US methods (CVPni) separately and in combination and the obtained measurements were correlated to the invasive measurements (CVPi) by catheters. Results By method 1, there is a highly significant positive correlation between CVPni and CVPi (ρ < 0.001) and a Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.913 n = 93), and by method 2, there is also a highly significant positive correlation between the CVPni and CVPi in both groups (r = 0.832, 95%, n = 106, p < 0.001), 1.935 was the cut-off point for prediction of CVP ≥ 10cmH20. For differentiation between patients with CVP < 10cmH20 and ≥ 10cmH20, the accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy) were 100%, 79.31%, 74.47%, 100%, and 87.10% by method 1, and were 91.11%, 85.48%, 82.00%, 92.98%, and 87.85% by method 2, while the combination of both methods had gained 88.57%, 89.66%, 83.78%, 92.86%, and 89.25%, respectively. Conclusion The US offered a reliable and non-invasive tool for monitoring CVP. The present study has a novelty of combining more than one US method and this had reported higher accuracy measures and outperformed the use of a single method.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Mercolini ◽  
Valentina Di Leo ◽  
Giulia Bordin ◽  
Roberto Melotti ◽  
Francesca Sperotto ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 231 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
WW Lautt ◽  
CV Greenway

Changes in hepatic blood volume in response to rapid elevations in hepatic venous pressure were examined in cats using hepatic plethysmography. The liver was intact and received blood from an intact portal vein and hepatic artery. The hepatic blood volume increased in response to elevated venous pressure. Compliance of the hepatic capacitance vessels became greater as the distending venous pressure was increased over the range of venous pressures studied (0-9.4 mmHg). When hepatic venous pressure was elevated to 9.4 MMHg, the hepatic blood volume more than doubled. The liver serves as an important buffer for rapid changes in blood volume, the importance increasing with greater infused volumes of fluid. While overall venous compliance decreased at distending pressures in excess of 5-6 mmHg, the compliance of the hepatic capacitance vessels shows marked increases at pressures above this level. Expansions of the blood volume results in elevations of central venous pressure. Within a few minutes the hepatic capacitance vessels sequester a significant proportion of the added volume. As long as central venous pressure is raised, the liver demonstrates a secondary fluid buffering role by filtering large volumes of fluid across the vascular bed into the peritoneum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document