scholarly journals Is intragastric administration of enteral nutrition safe in acute severe pancreatitis?

Critical Care ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P140
Author(s):  
I Grigoras ◽  
D Rusu ◽  
O Chelarescu ◽  
N Andrioaie ◽  
A Nistor
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqin Zhu ◽  
Zhaolin Chen

Objective: To analyze the effect of enteral nutrition and nursing intervention in patients with indwelling nasojejunal tube in acute severe pancreatitis. Methods: Sixty cases of patients with indwelt nasojejunal tubes treated in our hospital from August 2019 to August 2020 were divided into routine group and observation group as research subjects. Patients in both groups received enteral nutrition, patients in the routine group received routine care, and patients in the observation group received quality care. The recovery time of gastrointestinal function, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, nutritional indicators and incidence of complications in the two groups were compared. Results: The recovery time of gastrointestinal function in observation group was lower than that in routine group, P<0.05; The length and cost of hospitalization in observation group were lower than those in routine group, P<0.05; The nutritional indexes in observation group were higher than those in routine group, P<0.05; The incidence of complications in observation group was lower than that in routine group, P<0.05. Conclusion: Quality nursing service improve the effect of enteral nutrition, so as to ensure that patients get sufficient nutritional support. Its effect is remarkable and it is worthy of widespread clinical application.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 205873921982721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Jie Chen ◽  
Yao-Dong Zhuang ◽  
Zhe Cai ◽  
You-Ni Zhang ◽  
Sen-Ren Guo

The main objective of this study was to explore the effect of enteral nutrition on serum pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor, and intestinal barrier function in patients with acute severe pancreatitis. A total number of 140 patients were recruited and divided randomly into parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) groups. They received parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition, respectively. The levels of serum total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) in peripheral blood were detected in the two groups. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) in the two groups were comparatively analyzed. The levels of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα) for both groups were same, and there was no significant difference ( P < 0.05) between the two groups before treatment. However, after treatment, a significant reduction was found in EN group which were 31.16 ± 1.95, 36.09 ± 9.44, and 29.21 ± 3.85 ng/L, respectively, showing significant lower values as compared to PN group. The levels of TP and ALB in EN group were 64.46 ± 3.77 and 27.19 ± 1.56 g/L, respectively, after treatment, showing significantly ( P < 0.05) elevated values than PN group. The incidence rates of pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess in EN group were 28.57% and 11.43%, respectively, which were found to be lower significantly than PN group. Enteral nutrition is found to be more effective than parenteral nutrition in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis, which can significantly reduce the level of pro-inflammatory factors as well as the degree of systemic inflammatory response and protect the intestinal barrier function; thus, this study is worthy for awareness and application in clinical practice.


Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (32) ◽  
pp. e21569
Author(s):  
Yong-bo Guo ◽  
Yan Liu ◽  
Jing Ma ◽  
Ying Cai ◽  
Xiao-ming Jiang ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 116.e1-116.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Clementy ◽  
Olivier Genee ◽  
Jerome Fichet ◽  
Laurens Mitchell-Heggs ◽  
Benoit Fremont ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-111
Author(s):  
Deepak K. Bhasin ◽  
Rao Chalapathi ◽  
Surinder S. Rana ◽  
Yalaka R. Reddy ◽  
Ravi Sharma

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-95
Author(s):  
Uttam Laudari ◽  
Abishek Thapa ◽  
Tanka Prasad Bohara ◽  
Shail Rupakheti ◽  
Mukund Raj Joshi

Background: Clinically, the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) is identified by two or more symptoms including fever or hypothermia, tachycardia, tachypnea and change in blood leukocyte count. The relationship between SIRS symptoms at the time of presentation and severity of pancreatitis is yet to be determined though progression of SIRS in subsequent days has already been correlated.Objectives: To determine the severity of pancreatitis with SIRS score at the time of admission.Methodology: A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to Department of Surgery, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (KMCTH) with diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis (AP) from December 2014 to January 2016 was conducted. Clinical, biochemical and imaging data were collected from the medical record section. Patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis as per Revised Atlanta Classification 2012 were included in the study. SIRS score at time of admission was correlated with Modified Marshall scoring system for organ dysfunction. Patients were grouped into severe and nonsevere group. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of SIRS score at admission for organ failure were calculated.Results: Among the 41 patients admitted with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis irrespective of cause, the sensitivity of SIRS score ≥2 at admission in predicting severe pancreatitis was 60 %, specificity was 20%, positive predictive value was 28% and negative predictive value was 20 %, with p-value of 0.52 and odds ratio of 1.6 (CI: 0.376-6.808).Conclusion: SIRS score at admission cannot be solely used in predicting acute severe pancreatitis. Patients can be stratified in resource deficit setting for timely referral to tertiary centre.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 5023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Ying Qiao ◽  
Xiao-Qin Liu ◽  
Chang-Qin Xu ◽  
Zheng Zhang ◽  
Hong-Wei Xu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document