scholarly journals The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo-Hyun Jun ◽  
Rack Kyung Chung ◽  
Hee Jung Baik ◽  
Mi Hwa Chung ◽  
Joon-Sang Hyeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Trendelenburg Position ◽  
Volume Challenge

scholarly journals The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo-Hyun Jun ◽  
Rack Kyung Chung ◽  
Hee Jung Baik ◽  
Mi Hwa Chung ◽  
Joon-Sang Hyeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Predictive Capability ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Trendelenburg Position

Abstract Background: The reliability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) is controversial under pneumoperitoneum. In addition, the usefulness of these indices is being called into question with the increasing adoption of lung-protective ventilation using low tidal volume (VT) in surgical patients. A recent study indicated that changes in PPV or SVV obtained by transiently increasing VT (VT challenge) accurately predicted fluid responsiveness even in critically ill patients receiving low VT. We evaluated whether the changes in PPV and SVV induced by a VT challenge predicted fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum. Methods: We performed an interventional prospective study in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position under lung-protective ventilation. PPV, SVV, and the stroke volume index (SVI) were measured at a VT of 6 mL/kg and 3 minutes after increasing the VT to 8 mL/kg. The VT was reduced to 6 mL/kg, and measurements were performed before and 5 minutes after volume expansion (infusing 6% hydroxyethyl starch 6 ml/kg over 10 minutes). Fluid responsiveness was defined as ≥ 15% increase in the SVI. Results: Twenty-four of the 38 patients enrolled in the study were responders. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an increase in PPV > 1% after the VT challenge showed excellent predictive capability for fluid responsiveness, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83–0.99, P < 0.0001; sensitivity 92%, specificity 86%]. An increase in SVV > 2% after the VT challenge predicted fluid responsiveness, but showed only fair predictive capability, with an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60–0.89, P < 0.0006; sensitivity 46%, specificity 100%). The augmented values of PPV and SVV following VT challenge also showed the improved predictability of fluid responsiveness compared to PPV and SVV values (as measured by VT) of 6 ml/kg. Conclusions: The change in PPV following the VT challenge has excellent reliability in predicting fluid responsiveness in our surgical population. The change in SVV and augmented values of PPV and SVV following this test are also reliable.

scholarly journals Temporary increase in tidal volume to improve the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo-Hyun Jun ◽  
Rack Kyung Chung ◽  
Hee Jung Baik ◽  
Mi Hwa Chung ◽  
Joon-Sang Hyeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Temporary Increase ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Trendelenburg Position

Abstract Background: Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) induced by mechanical ventilation are widely used as predictors of fluid responsiveness. However, the reliability of these dynamic preload indices is controversial under pneumoperitoneum. In addition, the usefulness of these indices is being called into question with the increasing adoption of lung-protective ventilation using low tidal volume (VT) in surgical patients. We investigated whether increasing tidal volume (VT) from 6 to 8 ml/kg can improve the predictive power of PPV and SVV during pneurmoperitoneum. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position under lung-protective ventilation. PPV, SVV, and the stroke volume index (SVI) were measured at a VT of 6 mL/kg and 3 minutes after increasing the VT to 8 mL/kg. The VT was reduced to 6 mL/kg, and measurements were performed before and 5 minutes after volume expansion (infusing 6% hydroxyethyl starch 6 ml/kg over 10 minutes). Fluid responsiveness was defined as ≥ 15% increase in the SVI. Results: Twenty-four of the 38 patients enrolled in the study were responders. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the augmented PPV and SVV associated with a temporary increase in VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg improved the predictability of fluid responsiveness, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.95, P < 0.0001) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.61–0.89, P = 0.0003), compared to PPV and SVV values (as measured by VT) of 6 ml/kg. The absolute change in PPV and SVV values obtained by transiently increasing VT also predicted fluid responsiveness, with AUC values of 0.95 (95% CI 0.83–0.99, P < 0.0001) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60–0.89, P = 0.0006). Conclusions: Augmented PPV and SVV values, and absolute changes therein obtained by increasing VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg, predicted fluid responsiveness with high sensitivity and specificity in our surgical population.

scholarly journals Predicting Fluid Responsiveness Using Pulse Pressure Variation after Tidal Volume Challenge in Postoperative Patients Receiving Lung Protective Ventilation: A Clinical Trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pimsai Kunakorn ◽  
Sunthiti Morakul ◽  
Tananchai Petnak ◽  
Pongsasit Singhatat ◽  
Chawika Pisitsak
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Pressure Variation ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Predict Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Low Tidal Volume ◽  
Volume Ventilation ◽  
Volume Challenge

Abstract Background: Lung protective ventilation with low tidal volume is beneficial in patients with intermediate to high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. However, during low tidal volume ventilation, pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) do not predict fluid responsiveness. We aimed to determine whether changes in PPV and SVV after transient increases in tidal volume can predict fluid responsiveness in these patients. Methods: We recorded 22 measurements from 15 patients who experienced postoperative acute circulatory failure. We performed a tidal volume challenge by transiently increasing tidal volume (VT) from 6 to 8 mL/kg (VT6–8), 8 to 10 mL/kg (VT8–10), and 6 to 10 mL/kg (VT6–10) of patients' predicted body weight. The change in PPV (∆PPV) at VT6–8 (∆PPV6–8), VT8–10 (∆PPV8–10), VT6–10 (∆PPV6–10) and the change in SVV (∆SVV) at VT6–8 (∆SVV6–8), VT8–10 (∆SVV8–10), and VT6–10 (∆SVV6–10) were recorded. Patients were classified as fluid responders if there was an increase in stroke volume of more than 10% after a fluid bolus. Results: Following the tidal volume challenge, ∆PPV and ∆SVV failed to predict fluid responsiveness, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (with 95% confidence intervals) of 0.49 (0.23–0.74), 0.54 (0.29–0.79), 0.52 (0.28–0.77) for ∆PPV6–8, ∆PPV8–10, and ∆PPV6–10, and 0.55 (0.30–0.80), 0.55 (0.31–0.80), and 0.59 (0.34–0.84) for ∆SVV6–8, ∆SVV8–10, and ∆SVV6–10, respectively. Conclusions: Changes in PPV and SVV after the tidal volume challenge did not predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative patients with low tidal volume ventilation. Trial registration: This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.in.th, TCTR20190808003.

Effects of lung protective ventilation on postoperative respiratory parameters in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-516
Author(s):  
Mette Mølsted ◽  
Peter Ekeløf ◽  
Jesper Nørgaard Bech ◽  
Jost Wessels ◽  
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Respiratory Parameters

Assisted Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonne Doorduin ◽  
Christer A. Sinderby ◽  
Jennifer Beck ◽  
Johannes G. van der Hoeven ◽  
Leo M. A. Heunks
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Transpulmonary Pressure ◽  
Assisted Ventilation ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Variability

Abstract Background: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the use of assisted mechanical ventilation is a subject of debate. Assisted ventilation has benefits over controlled ventilation, such as preserved diaphragm function and improved oxygenation. Therefore, higher level of “patient control” of ventilator assist may be preferable in ARDS. However, assisted modes may also increase the risk of high tidal volumes and lung-distending pressures. The current study aims to quantify how differences in freedom to control the ventilator affect lung-protective ventilation, breathing pattern variability, and patient–ventilator interaction. Methods: Twelve patients with ARDS were ventilated in a randomized order with assist pressure control ventilation (PCV), pressure support ventilation (PSV), and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). Transpulmonary pressure, tidal volume, diaphragm electrical activity, and patient–ventilator interaction were measured. Respiratory variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation of tidal volume. Results: During inspiration, transpulmonary pressure was slightly lower with NAVA (10.3 ± 0.7, 11.2 ± 0.7, and 9.4 ± 0.7 cm H2O for PCV, PSV, and NAVA, respectively; P &lt; 0.01). Tidal volume was similar between modes (6.6 [5.7 to 7.0], 6.4 [5.8 to 7.0], and 6.0 [5.6 to 7.3] ml/kg for PCV, PSV, and NAVA, respectively), but respiratory variability was higher with NAVA (8.0 [6.4 to 10.0], 7.1 [5.9 to 9.0], and 17.0 [12.0 to 36.1] % for PCV, PSV, and NAVA, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). Patient–ventilator interaction improved with NAVA (6 [5 to 8] % error) compared with PCV (29 [14 to 52] % error) and PSV (12 [9 to 27] % error); P &lt; 0.0001. Conclusion: In patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS, increasing freedom to control the ventilator maintains lung-protective ventilation in terms of tidal volume and lung-distending pressure, but it improves patient–ventilator interaction and preserves respiratory variability.

scholarly journals Should we use lung protective ventilation for non-ARDS patients?

F1000Research ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1293
Author(s):  
Manasi Singh ◽  
A. Murat Kaynar
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Lower Tidal Volume

An evaluation of a recent study by Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO & Manetta JA et al: Association between Uses of Lung-Protective Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volume and Clinical Outcomes among Patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome a Meta-analysis. JAMA, October 24/31, 2012—Vol 308, No. 16. PMID: 23093163.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document