scholarly journals Heart failure management insights from primary care physicians and allied health care providers in Southwestern Ontario

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Narlon C. Boa Sorte Silva ◽  
Roseanne W. Pulford ◽  
Douglas S. Lee ◽  
Robert J. Petrella
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narlon C Boa Sorte Silva ◽  
Roseanne W Pulford ◽  
Douglas S. Lee ◽  
Robert J Petrella

Abstract Background It remains to be determined whether collaborative strategies to improve and sustain overall health in patients with heart failure (HF) are currently being adopted by health care professionals. We surveyed primary care physicians, nurses and allied health care professionals in Southwestern Ontario regarding how they currently manage HF patients and how they perceive limitations, barriers and challenges in achieving optimal management in these patients. Methods We developed an online survey based on field expertise and a review of pertinent literature in HF management. We analyzed quantitative data collected via an online questionnaire powered by Qualtrics®. The survey included 87 items, including multiple choice and free text questions. We collected participant demographic and educational background, and information relating to general clinical practice and specific to HF management. The survey was 25 minutes long and was administered in October and November of 2018 Results We included 118 health care professionals from network lists of affiliated physicians and clinics of the department of Family Medicine at Western University; 88.1% (n=104) were physicians while 11.9% (n=14) were identified as other health care professionals. Two-thirds of our respondents were females (n=72) and nearly one-third were males (n=38). The survey included mostly family physicians (n=74) and family medicine residents (n=25). Most respondents indicated co-managing their HF patients with other health care professionals, including cardiologists and internists. The vast majority of respondents reported preferring to manage their HF patients as part of a team rather than alone. As well, the majority respondents (n=47) indicated being satisfied with the way they currently manage their HF patients; however, some indicated that practice set up and communication resources, followed by experience and education relating to HF guidelines, current drug therapy and medical management were important barriers to optimal management of HF patients. Consultations Most respondents indicated HF management was satisfactory, however, a minority did identify some areas for improvement (communication systems, work more collaborative as a team, education resources and access to specialists). Future research should consider these factors in developing strategies to enhance primary care involvement in co-management of HF patients, within collaborative and multidisciplinary systems of care.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narlon C Boa Sorte Silva ◽  
Roseanne W Pulford ◽  
Douglas S. Lee ◽  
Robert J Petrella

Abstract Background It remains to be determined whether collaborative strategies to improve and sustain overall health in patients with heart failure (HF) are currently being adopted by health care professionals. We surveyed primary care physicians, nurses and allied health care professionals in Southwestern Ontario regarding how they currently manage HF patients and how they perceive limitations, barriers and challenges in achieving optimal management in these patients. Methods We developed an online survey based on field expertise and a review of pertinent literature in HF management. We analyzed quantitative data collected via an online questionnaire powered by Qualtrics®. The survey included 87 items, including multiple choice and free text questions. We collected participant demographic and educational background, and information relating to general clinical practice and specific to HF management. The survey was 25 minutes long and was administered in October and November of 2018 Results We included 118 health care professionals from network lists of affiliated physicians and clinics of the department of Family Medicine at Western University; 88.1% (n=104) were physicians while 11.9% (n=14) were identified as other health care professionals. Two-thirds of our respondents were females (n=72) and nearly one-third were males (n=38). The survey included mostly family physicians (n=74) and family medicine residents (n=25). Most respondents indicated co-managing their HF patients with other health care professionals, including cardiologists and internists. The vast majority of respondents reported preferring to manage their HF patients as part of a team rather than alone. As well, the majority respondents (n=47) indicated being satisfied with the way they currently manage their HF patients; however, some indicated that practice set up and communication resources, followed by experience and education relating to HF guidelines, current drug therapy and medical management were important barriers to optimal management of HF patients. Consultations Most respondents indicated HF management was satisfactory, however, a minority did identify some areas for improvement (communication systems, work more collaborative as a team, education resources and access to specialists). Future research should consider these factors in developing strategies to enhance primary care involvement in co-management of HF patients, within collaborative and multidisciplinary systems of care.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narlon C Boa Sorte Silva ◽  
Roseanne W Pulford ◽  
Douglas S. Lee ◽  
Robert J Petrella

Abstract Background It remains to be determined whether collaborative strategies to improve and sustain overall health in patients with heart failure (HF) are currently being adopted by health care professionals. We surveyed primary care physicians, nurses and allied health care professionals in Southwestern Ontario regarding how they currently manage HF patients and how they perceive limitations, barriers and challenges in achieving optimal management in these patients. Methods We developed an online survey based on field expertise and a review of pertinent literature in HF management. We analyzed quantitative data collected via an online questionnaire powered by Qualtrics®. The survey included 87 items, including multiple choice and free text questions. We collected participant demographic and educational background, and information relating to general clinical practice and specific to HF management. The survey was 25 minutes long and was administered in October and November of 2018 Results We included 118 health care professionals from network lists of affiliated physicians and clinics of the department of Family Medicine at Western University; 88.1% (n=104) were physicians while 11.9% (n=14) were identified as other health care professionals. Two-thirds of our respondents were females (n=72) and nearly one-third were males (n=38). The survey included mostly family physicians (n=74) and family medicine residents (n=25). Most respondents indicated co-managing their HF patients with other health care professionals, including cardiologists and internists. The vast majority of respondents reported preferring to manage their HF patients as part of a team rather than alone. As well, the majority respondents (n=47) indicated being satisfied with the way they currently manage their HF patients; however, some indicated that practice set up and communication resources, followed by experience and education relating to HF guidelines, current drug therapy and medical management were important barriers to optimal management of HF patients. Consultations Most respondents indicated HF management was satisfactory, however, a minority did identify some areas for improvement (communication systems, work more collaborative as a team, education resources and access to specialists). Future research should consider these factors in developing strategies to enhance primary care involvement in co-management of HF patients, within collaborative and multidisciplinary systems of care.


1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-225
Author(s):  
Karla Kelly

AbstractUntil recently, physicians have been the primary health care providers in the United States. In response to the rising health care costs and public demand of the past decade, allied health care providers have challenged this orthodox structure of health care delivery. Among these allied health care providers are nurse practitioners, who have attempted to expand traditional roles of the registered nurse.This article focuses on the legal issues raised by several major obstacles to the expansion of nurse practitioner services: licensing restrictions, third party reimbursement policies, and denial of access to medical facilities and physician back-up services. The successful judicial challenges to discriminatory practices against other allied health care providers will be explored as a solution to the nurse practitioners’ dilemma.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205435811773453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharanya Ramesh ◽  
Matthew T. James ◽  
Jayna M. Holroyd-Leduc ◽  
Stephen B. Wilton ◽  
Ellen W. Seely ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fred Lauer ◽  
Benjamin A. Neil

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; background: white;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Many primary care physicians are now considering changing <span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;">their practices to the new concierge medical practice. Also known as </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.05pt;">boutique medicine, retainer or "highly attentive" medicine. This new </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.2pt;">style practice offers access to a physician who has now limited the size of </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;">his practice in exchange for an annual fee.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span>These practices are nearly all primary care, and usually vary in <span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt;">size from 600 patients to 300 or less and carry a typical fee of $1,500.00 </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.05pt;">a year. Although a recent phenomenon, boutique medicine remains a </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;">small niche. But the number of practices continues to grow. Particularly on the East and West coasts where there are more wealthier people, who </span>expect more from their health care providers.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;">Benefits of this new practice include same-day or next-day </span>appointments not under time constraints, house calls, 24 hour a day <span style="letter-spacing: -0.2pt;">access by cell phone, annual wellness evaluations and highly appointed </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.5pt;">offices.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.25pt;">One of the major criticisms of concierge medicine involves those </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.05pt;">who do not participate in such a program. The practices also displace </span>patients to other medical providers. And as such, create problems of <span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt;">excessive demand on the existing physicians who do not participate.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.05pt;">Generally speaking, the patients who elect to participate in concierge practices are healthier and require less intensive care than </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;">those cared for in other settings. All this without consideration of the approximately 45 million Americans who live without health care insurance, which only serves to compound the existing problems.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span>There "VIP" medical services with their superior amenities and <span style="letter-spacing: -0.2pt;">convenience can be purchased by those with sufficient wealth. However, </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;">the question should not turn on the quality of health care which depends on the amount of money an individual can spend on it. Many would </span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.05pt;">regard good health as a right rather than a privilege.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.05pt;">The final ethical question is to consider the thought that an </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.1pt;">individual might experience more or less morbidity or mortality based on how much money they could devote to medical care. Health care </span><span style="letter-spacing: -0.05pt;">should not be discretionary, as everyone should be entitled to the </span>quality without regard to financial status.</span></span></p>


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (32) ◽  
pp. 5105-5111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Ganz

Cancer survivors frequently visit their primary-care physicians, as well as oncology specialists, for follow-up care. There is a need to monitor these survivors for the late physical effects of cancer, yet few health care providers have received training in how to do this. This article provides guidance on how to take a cancer survivor-directed medical history to facilitate the elicitation of relevant exposures, family history, and symptoms that may be related to the late effects of cancer therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-294
Author(s):  
Jefferson Jackson Wetherington ◽  
Forrest Quinn Pecha

Context Health care cost continues to rise; the US continues to spend dramatically more money than other developed nations per individual without increased health outcomes. More individuals are finding it harder to get access to a health care provider, especially those in medically underserved areas and populations. Objective To increase the knowledge of the athletic training educator about medically underserved populations and the roles athletic trainers (ATs) play as leaders in health care delivery. Background Current and future physician shortages are known and are only going to increase as more than one-third of current primary care physicians are expected to retire in the next 10 years. Forty percent of the population lives in areas that are medically underserved and designated by the government as areas of professional medical shortage; patients in these areas are primarily served by primary care physicians. Synthesis As with access to physicians, access to ATs has been shown to be based upon socioeconomic status and presents more challenges for the medically underserved. Early access to health care providers has shown to be important in adolescents, as negative health behaviors can carry into adulthood, leading to poorer health-related outcomes throughout life. Recommendation(s) To ensure that athletic training educational programs include opportunities to provide service to the medically underserved, education on social determinates of health, and the means by which ATs can fill critical holes in providing care for these patients. More research is needed to validate ATs' roles in providing quality health care. Additionally, more research is needed around how AT education can help meet patient needs. Conclusion(s) As the athletic training profession continues to evolve and responds to the growing demands of the complex health care system, access to an AT may provide a vital bridge to overall health care for patients within medically underserved populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document