scholarly journals Games of uncertainty: the participation of older patients with multimorbidity in care planning meetings – a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jannike Dyb Oksavik ◽  
Marit Solbjør ◽  
Ralf Kirchhoff ◽  
Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad

Abstract Background Active patients lie at the heart of integrated care. Although interventions to increase the participation of older patients in care planning are being implemented in several countries, there is a lack of knowledge about the interactions involved and how they are experienced by older patients with multimorbidity. We explore this issue in the context of care-planning meetings within Norwegian municipal health services. Methods This qualitative study drew on direct observations of ten care-planning meetings and an interview with each patient right after the meeting. Following a stepwise-deductive induction approach, the analysis began inductively and then considered the interactions through the lens of game theory. Results The care-planning interactions were influenced by uncertainty about the course of the disease and how to plan service delivery. In terms derived from game theory, the imaginary and unpredictable player ‘Nature’ generated uncertainty in the ‘game’ of care planning. The ‘players’ assessed this uncertainty differently, leading to three patterns of game. 1) In the ‘game of chance’, patients viewed future events as random and uncontrollable; they felt outmatched by the opponent Nature and became passive in their decision-making. 2) In the ‘competitive game’, participants positioned themselves on two opposing sides, one side perceiving Nature as a significant threat and the other assigning it little importance. The two sides negotiated about how to accommodate uncertainty, and the level of patient participation varied. 3) In the ‘coordination game’, all participants were aligned, either in viewing themselves as teammates against Nature or in ascribing little importance to it. The level of patient participation was high. Conclusions In care planning meetings, the level of patient participation may partly be associated with how the various actors appraise and respond to uncertainty. Dialogue on uncertainty in care-planning interventions could help to increase patient participation.

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e024762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolien Jeltje Glaudemans ◽  
Eric Moll van Charante ◽  
Jan Wind ◽  
John Jacob Oosterink ◽  
Dick Ludolf Willems

ObjectivesAdvance care planning (ACP) with older people needs to be approached differently than ACP with patients with a terminal illness. ACP is still used with only a minority of older patients due to a lack of knowledge regarding appropriate approaches to ACP with older people. General practitioners (GPs) may play a key role in ACP with older people. Therefore, we explored their experiences with and views on approaches to ACP with older patients in daily practice.Design, setting and participantsA qualitative study among a purposive sample of 19 Dutch GPs based on semistructured interviews.ResultsApproaches to ACP with older patients can be divided into two categories: systematic and ad hoc. Systematic approaches consisted of discussing a fixed combination of topics with community-dwelling older patients who are frail, cognitively impaired or are aged >75 years, and with older patients living in residential care homes during group information meetings, intakes, comprehensive geriatric assessments and periodic assessments. Meetings were aimed at making agreements in anticipation of future care, at providing information and encouraging older people to take further steps in ACP. With ad hoc approaches, respondents discussed only one or two topics related to the near future. Ad hoc ACP was mainly done with deteriorating patients or when patients or family initiated ACP. Systematic and ad hoc approaches were used simultaneously or sequentially and were both used for initiating and following up on ACP. Due to a lack of time and knowledge of other occasions and topics than the ones respondents used, respondents seemed to underuse many occasions and topics.ConclusionsAwareness of appropriate systematic and ad hoc approaches for ACP, and the focus on providing information and encouraging older people to take further steps in ACP reported in this study can support GPs and improve older patients’ access to ACP.


Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Brenda Groen ◽  
Hester van Sprang

Entering a building is a ‘moment of truth’ and may invoke feelings of hospitableness. Physical environments and staff behaviour deliver ‘clues’ that may result in the experience of hospitality. The focus in a reception area may be on mitigation of risks, or on a hospitable atmosphere, with either a host or a security officer at the entrance. However, the division of tasks to either the pleasing host or the controlling security officer to a certain extent disavows the overlap between perceptions of hospitality and safety. This exploratory qualitative study combines a group interview with three managers responsible for hospitality and security in reception areas and Critical Incidents by staff and visitors (N = 51). Thematic coding was based on The Egg Aggregated Model and the Experience of Hospitality Scale. Results show that hospitality and safety are indeed two sides of the same coin. Usually people do accept security measures, provided that staff act in a hospitable way. A lack of security measures may seem ‘inviting’, but also decreases the perception of care for your visitor, and may cause uncertainty and therefore decrease comfort. A correct risk perception, flexible appliance of security measures, and a friendly approach connect aspects of ‘safe’ and ‘hospitable’ sentiments.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1576-1580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne J. Nidiry ◽  
Aysegul Gozu ◽  
Joseph A. Carrese ◽  
Scott M. Wright

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e0153747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline De Vleminck ◽  
Koen Pardon ◽  
Kim Beernaert ◽  
Dirk Houttekier ◽  
Robert Vander Stichele ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 3710
Author(s):  
Nijolė Batarlienė ◽  
Maksimas Meleniakas

A claim can be understood as a negative result of the performance of a contract, as it is necessary to fulfill the obligation and/or indemnify (freight damage claim, for example). Today’s claims management faces a variety of problems, such as inefficient claims postings, possible data forgery, and a very lengthy claims resolution process. All these problems can be solved by using a synthesis of innovative tools, e.g., a blockchain system, game theory, and statistical methods. Theoretical possibilities and practical examples regarding solving claims management problems were identified by analyzing various scientific sources. However, it remained unclear whether these methods could interact with each other, complicate the existing claims settlement process or not, or whether a synthesis of such measures would be viable. Therefore, a qualitative study was conducted and answers to the above questions were found. The research revealed that 75% of international Lithuanian logistics companies can apply the synthesis of these methods in claims management and solutions. Using the concordance coefficient formula, the value of W was calculated. This coefficient indicated that the opinions of the experts who participated in the study were somewhat similar. The value of the actual χ2 distribution was also calculated. The result obtained shows that the experts’ opinions were somewhat harmonized and that their compatibility was not accidental. The use of blockchain system synthesis in combination with game theory and statistical methods could help international logistics companies to reduce their costs, speed up the management process, and increase data security and reliability while ensuring structured one-stop claims management.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 628-635
Author(s):  
Lorna E. Ingoe ◽  
Janis Hickey ◽  
Simon Pearce ◽  
Tim Rapley ◽  
Salman Razvi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Schildmeijer ◽  
Per Nilsen ◽  
Carin Ericsson ◽  
Anders Brostrom ◽  
Janna Skagerstrom

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document