scholarly journals Rationale and design of the OPTIMIZE trial: OPen label multicenter randomized trial comparing standard IMmunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with a low exposure tacrolimus regimen In combination with everolimus in de novo renal transplantation in Elderly patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. de Boer ◽  
J. S.F. Sanders ◽  
F. J. Bemelman ◽  
M. G.H. Betjes ◽  
J. G.M. Burgerhof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Immunosuppressive Regimen ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Elderly Recipients

Abstract Background In 2019, more than 30 % of all newly transplanted kidney transplant recipients in The Netherlands were above 65 years of age. Elderly patients are less prone to rejection, and death censored graft loss is less frequent compared to younger recipients. Elderly recipients do have increased rates of malignancy and infection-related mortality. Poor kidney transplant function in elderly recipients may be related to both pre-existing (i.e. donor-derived) kidney damage and increased susceptibility to nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidneys from older donors. Hence, it is pivotal to shift the focus from prevention of rejection to preservation of graft function and prevention of over-immunosuppression in the elderly. The OPTIMIZE study will test the hypothesis that reduced CNI exposure in combination with everolimus will lead to better kidney transplant function, a reduced incidence of complications and improved health-related quality of life for kidney transplant recipients aged 65 years and older, compared to standard immunosuppression. Methods This open label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial will include 374 elderly kidney transplant recipients (≥ 65 years) and consists of two strata. Stratum A includes elderly recipients of a kidney from an elderly deceased donor and stratum B includes elderly recipients of a kidney from a living donor or from a deceased donor < 65 years. In each stratum, subjects will be randomized to a standard, tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen with mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids or an adapted immunosuppressive regimen with reduced CNI exposure in combination with everolimus and glucocorticoids. The primary endpoint is ‘successful transplantation’, defined as survival with a functioning graft and an eGFR ≥ 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in stratum A and ≥ 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in stratum B, after 2 years, respectively. Conclusions The OPTIMIZE study will help to determine the optimal immunosuppressive regimen after kidney transplantation for elderly patients and the cost-effectiveness of this regimen. It will also provide deeper insight into immunosenescence and both subjective and objective outcomes after kidney transplantation in elderly recipients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03797196, registered January 9th, 2019. EudraCT: 2018-003194-10, registered March 19th, 2019.

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen

2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 070907013847002-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
Edison L Sampaio ◽  
Paula G Pinheiro-Machado ◽  
Riberto Garcia ◽  
Claudia R Felipe ◽  
Sung I Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Immunosuppressive Regimen ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

scholarly journals Drug-Induced Hematological Cytopenia in Kidney Transplantation and the Challenges It Poses for Kidney Transplant Physicians

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil ◽  
Muhammad Ashhad Ullah Khalil ◽  
Taqi F. Taufeeq Khan ◽  
Jackson Tan
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Immunosuppressive Regimen ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Immunosuppressive Medications ◽  
Literature Evidence ◽  
Subsequent Modification

Drug-induced hematological cytopenia is common in kidney transplantation. Various cytopenia including leucopenia (neutropenia), thrombocytopenia, and anemia can occur in kidney transplant recipients. Persistent severe leucopenia or neutropenia can lead to opportunistic infections of various etiologies. On the contrary, reducing or stopping immunosuppressive medications in these events can provoke a rejection. Transplant clinicians are often faced with the delicate dilemma of balancing cytopenia and rejection from adjustments of immunosuppressive regimen. Differentials of drug-induced cytopenia are wide. Identification of culprit medication and subsequent modification is also challenging. In this review, we will discuss individual drug implicated in causing cytopenia and correlate it with corresponding literature evidence.

scholarly journals Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression (ATHENA): A pragmatic randomized trial

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. e1003668
Author(s):  
Piero Ruggenenti ◽  
Paolo Cravedi ◽  
Eliana Gotti ◽  
Annarita Plati ◽  
Maddalena Marasà ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Deceased Donor Kidney ◽  
Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant

Background We compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression. Methods and findings ATHENA, a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter trial conducted by 6 Italian transplant centers, compared the outcomes of 233 consenting recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant induced with low-dose thymoglobulin and basiliximab and randomized to MMF (750 mg twice/day, n = 119) or AZA (75 to 125 mg/day, n = 114) added-on maintenance low-dose CsA microemulsion and 1-week steroid. In patients without acute clinical or subclinical rejections, CsA dose was progressively halved. Primary endpoint was biopsy-proven CAN. Analysis was by intention to treat. Participants were included between June 2007 and July 2012 and followed up to August 2016. Between-group donor and recipient characteristics, donor/recipient mismatches, and follow-up CsA blood levels were similar. During a median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow-up of 47.7 (44.2 to 48.9) months, 29 of 87 biopsied patients on MMF (33.3%) versus 31 of 88 on AZA (35.2%) developed CAN (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.147 (0.691 to 1.904, p = 0.595). Twenty and 21 patients on MMF versus 34 and 14 on AZA had clinical [HR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.34 to 1.02); p = 0.057) or biopsy-proven subclinical [HR (95% CI): 1.49 (0.76 to 2.92); p = 0.249] ACR, respectively. Combined events [HR (95% CI): 0.85 (0.56 to 1.29); p = 0.438], patient and graft survival, delayed graft function (DGF), 3-year glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [53.8 (40.6;65.7) versus 49.8 (36.8;62.5) mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.50], and adverse events (AEs) were not significantly different between groups. Chronicity scores other than CAN predict long-term graft outcome. Study limitations include small sample size and unblinded design. Conclusions In this study, we found that in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients on low-dose CsA and no steroids, MMF had no significant benefits over AZA. This finding suggests that AZA, due to its lower costs, could safely replace MMF in combination with minimized immunosuppression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00494741; EUDRACT 2006-005604-14.

scholarly journals Current Pharmacological Intervention and Medical Management for Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 413
Author(s):  
Theerawut Klangjareonchai ◽  
Natsuki Eguchi ◽  
Ekamol Tantisattamo ◽  
Antoney J. Ferrey ◽  
Uttam Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Allograft ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Glucose Management

Hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation is common in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Both pretransplant and post-transplant diabetes mellitus are associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality. Glucose management may be challenging for kidney transplant recipients. The pathophysiology and pattern of hyperglycemia in patients following kidney transplantation is different from those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with pre-existing and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, there is limited data on the management of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation. The following article discusses the nomenclature and diagnosis of pre- and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, the impact of transplant-related hyperglycemia on patient and kidney allograft outcomes, risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation, glucose management before and after transplantation, and modalities for prevention of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

scholarly journals Changes in quality of life (QoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients and those awaiting transplantation in the UK ATTOM programme: a longitudinal cohort questionnaire survey with additional qualitative interviews

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e047263
Author(s):  
Andrea Gibbons ◽  
Janet Bayfield ◽  
Marco Cinnirella ◽  
Heather Draper ◽  
Rachel J Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectiveTo examine quality of life (QoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in kidney transplant recipients and those awaiting transplantation.DesignLongitudinal cohort questionnaire surveys and qualitative semi-structured interviews using thematic analysis with a pragmatic approach.SettingCompletion of generic and disease-specific PROMs at two time points, and telephone interviews with participants UK-wide.Participants101 incident deceased-donor (DD) and 94 incident living-donor (LD) kidney transplant recipients, together with 165 patients on the waiting list (WL) from 18 UK centres recruited to the Access to Transplantation and Transplant Outcome Measures (ATTOM) programme completed PROMs at recruitment (November 2011 to March 2013) and 1 year follow-up. Forty-one of the 165 patients on the WL received a DD transplant and 26 received a LD transplant during the study period, completing PROMs initially as patients on the WL, and again 1 year post-transplant. A subsample of 10 LD and 10 DD recipients participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews.ResultsLD recipients were younger, had more educational qualifications and more often received a transplant before dialysis. Controlling for these and other factors, cross-sectional analyses at 12 months post-transplant suggested better QoL, renal-dependent QoL and treatment satisfaction for LD than DD recipients. Patients on the WL reported worse outcomes compared with both transplant groups. However, longitudinal analyses (controlling for pre-transplant differences) showed that LD and DD recipients reported similarly improved health status and renal-dependent QoL (p<0.01) pre-transplant to post-transplant. Patients on the WL had worsened health status but no change in QoL. Qualitative analyses revealed transplant recipients’ expectations influenced their recovery and satisfaction with transplant.ConclusionsWhile cross-sectional analyses suggested LD kidney transplantation leads to better QoL and treatment satisfaction, longitudinal assessment showed similar QoL improvements in PROMs for both transplant groups, with better outcomes than for those still wait-listed. Regardless of transplant type, clinicians need to be aware that managing expectations is important for facilitating patients’ adjustment post-transplant.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Fabry Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Diseases ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Maria L. Gonzalez Suarez ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Panupong Hansrivijit ◽  
Juan Medaura ◽  
Pradeep Vaitla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Fabry Disease ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Allograft Rejection ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Lysosomal Storage ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Enzyme Replacement

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder with progressive systemic deposition of globotriaosylceramide, leading to life-threatening cardiac, central nervous system, and kidney disease. Current therapy involves symptomatic medical management, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), dialysis, kidney transplantation, and, more recently, gene therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess outcomes of kidney transplantation among patients with FD. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database, from inception through to 28 February 2020, to identify studies that evaluate outcomes of kidney transplantation including patient and allograft survival among kidney transplant patients with FD. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined using the random-effects generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results: In total, 11 studies, including 424 kidney transplant recipients with FD, were enrolled. The post-transplant median follow-up time ranged from 3 to 11.5 years. Overall, the pooled estimated rates of all-cause graft failure, graft failure before death, and allograft rejection were 32.5% (95%CI: 23.9%–42.5%), 14.5% (95%CI: 8.4%–23.7%), and 20.2% (95%CI: 15.4%–25.9%), respectively. In the sensitivity analysis, limited only to the recent studies (year 2001 or newer when ERT became available), the pooled estimated rates of all-cause graft failure, graft failure before death, and allograft rejection were 28.1% (95%CI: 20.5%–37.3%), 11.7% (95%CI: 8.4%–16.0%), and 20.2% (95%CI: 15.5%–26.0%), respectively. The pooled estimated rate of biopsy proven FD recurrence was 11.1% (95%CI: 3.6%–29.4%), respectively. There are no significant differences in the risks of all-cause graft failure (p = 0.10) or mortality (0.48) among recipients with vs. without FD. Conclusions: Despite possible FD recurrence after transplantation of 11.1%, allograft and patient survival are comparable among kidney transplant recipients with vs. without FD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document