scholarly journals Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Rainey ◽  
Daniëlle van der Waal ◽  
Mireille J. M. Broeders

Abstract Background Risk-based breast cancer screening may improve the benefit-harm ratio of screening by tailoring policy to a woman’s personal breast cancer risk. This study aims to explore Dutch women’s preferences regarding the organisation and implementation of a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme, identifying potential barriers and facilitators to uptake. Methods A total of 5110 participants in the Dutch Personalised RISk-based MAmmography screening (PRISMA) study were invited, of whom 942 completed a two-part web-based survey. The first part contained questions about personal characteristics; for the second part, women were randomly assigned to one of four hypothetical breast cancer risk scenarios (i.e. low, average, moderate, or high) with subsequent tailored screening and prevention advice. Descriptive statistics are used to present women’s organisational preferences. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using seven proxy measures for acceptability of risk-based screening (e.g., interest in risk) and risk-based prevention (e.g., willingness to change diet). Results Interest in breast cancer risk was high (80.3%). Higher assigned risk scenario was most consistently associated with acceptance of tailored screening and prevention recommendations. Increased acceptance of lifestyle changes was additionally associated with higher education. Having a first degree family history of breast cancer decreased women’s motivation to participate in preventative lifestyle measures. Acceptability of medication was associated with a woman’s general beliefs about the (over)use and benefit-harm balance of medication. Conclusions Dutch women generally appear in favour of receiving their breast cancer risk estimate with subsequent tailored screening and prevention recommendations. However, women’s level of acceptance depends on their assigned risk category. Offering tailored screening and prevention recommendations to low-risk women will be most challenging. Educating women on the benefits and harms of all risk-based screening and prevention strategies is key to acceptability and informed decision-making.

2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel J.W. Greuter ◽  
Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide ◽  
Cathrien E. Jacobi ◽  
Jan C. Oosterwijk ◽  
Liesbeth Jansen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 938-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Ahern ◽  
Brian L. Sprague ◽  
Michael C.S. Bissell ◽  
Diana L. Miglioretti ◽  
Diana S.M. Buist ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 396-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathijs C. Goossens ◽  
Isabel De Brabander ◽  
Jacques De Greve ◽  
Evelien Vaes ◽  
Chantal Van Ongeval ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Syl D. de la Cruz ◽  
Mona Sarfaty ◽  
Richard C. Wender

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gagnon ◽  
E. Lévesque ◽  
F. Borduas ◽  
J. Chiquette ◽  
C. Diorio ◽  
...  

In recent years, risk stratification has sparked interest as an innovative approach to disease screening and prevention. The approach effectively personalizes individual risk, opening the way to screening and prevention interventions that are adapted to subpopulations. The international perspective project, which is developing risk stratification for breast cancer, aims to support the integration of its screening approach into clinical practice through comprehensive tool-building. Policies and guidelines for risk stratification—unlike those for population screening programs, which are currently well regulated—are still under development. Indeed, the development of guidelines for risk stratification reflects the translational aspects of perspective.Here, we describe the risk stratification process that was devised in the context of perspective, and we then explain the consensus-based method used to develop recommendations for breast cancer screening and prevention in a risk-stratification approach. Lastly, we discuss how the recommendations might affect current screening policies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document