scholarly journals Prediction of postoperative refractive astigmatism before toric intraocular lens implantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kawahara
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Anterior Chamber Depth ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rms Errors

Abstract Background To determine the preoperative factors influencing refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery for astigmatism correction by toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and to evaluate the prediction model using these factors. Methods Prospective, observational case series. The right eyes of forty consecutive patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of the total cornea of 1.5 diopters (D) or more in magnitude and scheduled for implantation of a non-toric IOL during cataract surgery with a 2.4-mm temporal clear corneal incision were examined prospectively. The vertical/horizontal astigmatism component (J0) and oblique astigmatism component (J45) of refractive and corneal astigmatism were converted using power vector analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed with refractive astigmatism at three months postoperatively as the dependent variable, and preoperative parameters including age, sex, refractive astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, sphere, spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, lens positions (tilt and decentration), axial length, and corneal higher order aberrations as independent variables. The root mean square (RMS) errors were calculated to express the regression model fit. Results The regression model for the J0 component was $$ Postoperative\kern0.34em refractive\kern0.2em J0=1.05\times Coneal\kern0.2em J0-0.14 $$ P o s t o p e r a t i v e r e f r a c t i v e J 0 = 1.05 × C o n e a l J 0 − 0.14 (R2 = 0.96, P < 0.001). The model for the J45 component was $$ Postoperative\kern0.34em refractive\kern0.2em J45=0.68\times Coneal\kern0.2em J45+0.19\times Preoperative\kern0.34em refractive\kern0.2em J45-0.06 $$ P o s t o p e r a t i v e r e f r a c t i v e J 45 = 0.68 × C o n e a l J 45 + 0.19 × P r e o p e r a t i v e r e f r a c t i v e J 45 − 0.06 (R2 = 0.72, P < 0.001). The mean RMS errors for preoperative corneal astigmatism alone and the multivariate model were 0.58 D and 0.46 D, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.02). Conclusions Refractive astigmatism after implantation of a toric IOL can be predicted by the regression model more accurately than by corneal astigmatism alone. However, the prediction of oblique astigmatism remains a challenge.

scholarly journals Prediction of Postoperative Refractive Astigmatism Before Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kawahara
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Anterior Chamber Depth ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rms Errors

Abstract Background: To determine predictors of postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery for astigmatism correction by toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.Methods: Prospective, observational case series. The right eyes of forty consecutive patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of the total cornea of 1.5 diopters (D) or more in magnitude and scheduled for implantation of a non-toric IOL during cataract surgery with a 2.4-mm temporal clear corneal incision were examined prospectively. The vertical/horizontal astigmatism component (J0) and oblique astigmatism component (J45) of refractive and corneal astigmatism were converted using power vector analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed with refractive astigmatism at three months postoperatively as the dependent variable, and preoperative parameters including age, sex, refractive astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, sphere, spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, axial length, and corneal higher order aberrations as independent variables. The root mean square (RMS) errors were calculated to express the regression model fit.Results: The regression model for the J0 component was Postoperative refractive J0 = 1.05 × Coneal J0 - 0.14 (R2 = 0.96, P < 0.001). The model for the J45 component was Postoperative refractive J45 = 0.68 × Coneal J45 + 0.19 × Postoperative refractive J45 - 0.06 (R2 = 0.72, P < 0.001). The mean RMS errors for preoperative corneal astigmatism alone and the multivariate model were 0.58 D and 0.46 D, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.02).Conclusions: Refractive astigmatism after implantation of a toric IOL can be predicted by the regression model using preoperative corneal and refractive astigmatism more accurately than by corneal astigmatism alone. However, the prediction of oblique astigmatism remains a challenge.

scholarly journals Comparison of Astigmatism Correction in Cataract Surgery Between Simultaneous Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Intrastromal Arcuate Keratotomy and Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Ji Kwon ◽  
Hun Lee ◽  
Jin Ah Lee ◽  
Jae Yong Kim ◽  
Hungwon Tchah
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objectives To compare the efficacy of astigmatic correction between simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted intrastromal arcuate keratotomy (AK) combined with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation during cataract surgery in moderate astigmatism. Design: Retrospective observational study, tertiary care medical center Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent astigmatic correction via femtosecond laser-assisted intrastromal AK (AK group; 27 eyes of 27 patients) with FLACS or toric IOL implantation (toric IOL group; 21 eyes of 21 patients). All patients had senile cataracts with corneal astigmatism ranging from + 1.00 to + 2.00 diopters (D) before cataract surgery. We measured visual acuity, intraocular pressure, automated keratometry, manifest refraction and topography preoperatively and at 1-day, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month postoperatively. Results Refractive astigmatism was significantly decreased in both groups. The mean preoperative and 6-month postoperative refractive astigmatism were 1.85 ± 1.07 and 0.99 ± 0.51 D, respectively, in the AK group (P = 0.028), and 1.84 ± 0.81 and 0.68 ± 0.21 D, respectively, in the toric IOL group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in refractive astigmatism between the two groups at 6-month postoperatively (0.99 ± 0.51 vs 0.68 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.057). At 6-month postoperatively, parameters for vector analysis of refractive astigmatism showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Corneal astigmatism was significantly decreased in the AK group. There was significant difference in corneal astigmatism from topography and automated keratometer between the two groups at 6-month postoperatively (0.94 ± 0.40 vs 1.53 ± 0.46 D, P = 0.018 for topography and 0.98 ± 0.69 vs 1.37 ± 0.41 D, P = 0.032 for automated keratometer). Conclusions Femtosecond laser-assisted intrastromal AK in FLACS could be an effective procedure for reducing astigmatism as well as toric IOL implantation in cataract surgery.

scholarly journals Astigmatic correction of simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with intrastromal arcuate keratotomy (ISAK) versus Toric intraocular Lens Impantation with conventional phacoemulsification

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Ji Kwon ◽  
Hun Lee ◽  
Jin Ah. Lee ◽  
Jae Yong Kim ◽  
Hungwon Tchah
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Vector Analysis ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background To compare the efficacies in astigmatic correction of simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with intrastromal arcuate keratotomy (ISAK) versus toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with conventional phacoemulsification in moderate astigmatism. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who had undergone cataract surgery by one surgeon. We identified patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism from + 0.75 to + 2.00 diopters (D) who had undergone astigmatic correction with FLACS with ISAK or toric IOL implantation with conventional phacoemulsification. We measured the visual acuity, intraocular pressure, automated keratometer, manifest refraction, and topography preoperatively and 1-day, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month postoperatively. The vector analysis of refractive astigmatism was performed. Results Of a total of 48 eyes of 48 patients, 27 eyes of 27 patients had FLACS with ISAK (AK group), and 21 eyes of 21 patients had conventional cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation (toric IOL group). Refractive astigmatism was significantly decreased in both groups. The mean preoperative and 6-month postoperative refractive astigmatism were 1.85 ± 1.07 and 0.99 ± 0.51 D, respectively, in the AK group (P = 0.028), and 1.84 ± 0.81 and 0.68 ± 0.21 D, respectively, in the toric IOL group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in refractive astigmatism between the two groups at 6-month postoperatively (0.99 ± 0.51 vs 0.68 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.057). At 6-month postoperatively, parameters for vector analysis of refractive astigmatism showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Corneal astigmatism was significantly decreased in the AK group. Corneal astigmatism from topography and the automated keratometer were significantly lower in the AK group 6-month postoperatively compared to toric IOL group (0.94 ± 0.40 vs. 1.53 ± 0.46 D, P = 0.018 for topography; and 0.98 ± 0.69 vs. 1.37 ± 0.41 D, P = 0.032 for the automated keratometer). Conclusions FLACS with ISAK could be an effective procedure for reducing astigmatism as well as toric IOL implantation in cataract surgery.

scholarly journals Three-Random-Point Marking Method for Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment Using the iTrace Aberrometer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Yongyi Niu ◽  
Hongliang Lin ◽  
Yongjie Qin ◽  
Cheng Yang ◽  
Yanlei Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Random Point ◽  
Horizontal Meridian ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Preoperative Marking ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose. To evaluate the clinical outcome of the three-random-point (TRP) marking method for toric intraocular lens (IOL) alignment using the iTrace aberrometer (Tracey Technologies Corp., Houston, TX). Setting. Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Eye Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China. Design. Prospective, randomized comparative trial. Method. Thirty eyes of 30 patients undergoing cataract surgery with coexisting corneal astigmatism of over 1.0 D were included in this study. All patients were prospectively randomized into the TRP marking group or slit-lamp horizontal meridian (SHM) marking group. TRP marking involved marking three points randomly in the corneal limbus of the patients and accurately marking the horizontal meridian was not required. The follow-up duration was 3 months after cataract surgery. Results. Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were in the TRP marking group and 15 eyes of 15 patients in the SHM marking group. There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA, UDVA, preexisting corneal astigmatism, or residual astigmatism between the groups before or after surgery P > 0.05 . The mean toric IOL misalignment was lesser but without significance in the TRP marking group than in the SHM marking group after 3 postoperative months (2.66° ± 1.42° versus 3.29° ± 1.67°; P = 0.295 ). Conclusion. The TRP marking method using the iTrace aberrometer is simple and accurate for preoperative marking of toric IOLs. It can eliminate the potential systematic errors resulting from varying head positions during the preoperative keratometry measurement and from manual marking.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes after Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery with Implantation of the Tecnis Toric Intraocular Lens

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Lubiński ◽  
Beata Kaźmierczak ◽  
Jolanta Gronkowska-Serafin ◽  
Karolina Podborączyńska-Jodko
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Visual Disturbances

Purpose. To evaluate the clinical outcomes after uncomplicated cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric toric intraocular lens (IOL) during a 6-month follow-up.Methods. Prospective study including 27 consecutive eyes of 18 patients (mean age:66.1±11.4years) with a visually significant cataract and corneal astigmatism ≥ 0.75 D and undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis ZCT toric IOL (Abbott Medical Optics). Visual, refractive, and keratometric outcomes as well as IOL rotation were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. At the end of the follow-up, patient satisfaction and perception of optical/visual disturbances were also evaluated using a subjective questionnaire.Results.At 6 months after surgery, mean LogMAR uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were0.19±0.12and0.14±0.10, respectively. Postoperative UDVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 92.6% of eyes. Mean refractive cylinder decreased significantly from −3.73±1.96to −1.42±0.88 D (p<0.001), while keratometric cylinder did not change significantly (p=0.44). Mean absolute IOL rotation was1.1±2.4°, with values of more than 5° in only 2 eyes (6.9%). Mean patient satisfaction score was9.70±0.46, using a scale from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). No postoperative optical/visual disturbances were reported.Conclusion.Cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis toric IOL is an effective method of refractive correction in eyes with corneal astigmatism due to the good IOL positional stability, providing high levels of patient’s satisfaction.

scholarly journals Clinical differences between toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation when myopia is determined as target refraction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da young Shin ◽  
Ho Sik Hwang ◽  
Hyun Seung Kim ◽  
Man Soo Kim ◽  
Eun Chul Kim
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Monofocal Iol ◽  
Target Refraction ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Background: To analyze and compare the clinical results of toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal IOL implantation when the target refraction value is determined -3 diopter (D) in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D).Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients with corneal astigmatism >1.5D who underwent cataract surgery and their target refraction is determined -3D. 100 eyes (100 patients; monofocal IOL, 60; toric IOL, 40) were enrolled in the current study. Near and distant uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected VA, spherical equivalent and refractive, corneal astigmatism were evaluated before and after surgery.Results: The near UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.26±0.33) after cataract surgery was significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.48±0.32) (p=0.030). The distant UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.38 ± 0.14) was also significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.55 ± 0.22) (p = 0.026). There were no significant intergroup differences in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.710) and mean spherical equivalent (p = 0.465). In the toric IOL group, postoperative refractive astigmatism was -0.80 ± 0.46D and postoperative corneal astigmatism was -1.50 ± 0.62D, whereas the corresponding values in the monofocal IOL group were -1.65 ± 0.77D and -1.45 ± 0.64D; residual refractive astigmatism was significantly lower with toric IOL implantation compared with monofocal IOL implantation (p = 0.001). Conclusions: When myopic refraction such as -3D was determined as the target power in patients with corneal astigmatism, toric IOL implantation led to excellent improvement in both near and distant UCVA.

scholarly journals ‘Comparison of Safety and Performance of Two Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Cataract Surgery’

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
öznur işcan ◽  
Banu Torun Acar ◽  
Burcu Nurozler Tarakcı
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Anterior Chamber Depth ◽  
Sodium Hyaluronate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Purpose: To compare the safety and performance of two ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) Bio-Hyalur SV (Sodium Hyaluronate 3.0%) (Biotech Healthcare Group, Luzern, Switzerland) and Protectalon (sodium hyaluronate 2.0%) (VSY Biotechnology, Turkey) in cataract surgery. Methods: One hundred twenty eyes of one hundred twenty patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery were included in the study. Postoperatively sixty eyes using Bio-Hyalur-SV were classified as Group 1, and sixty eyes using Protectalon as Group 2. Patients aged 45 and over, Grade I, II or III unilateral / double stained cataract, healthy eyes creating cataract inclueded in this study . Endothelial cell morphological parameters including endothelial cell density (ECD), cell number, cell area, coefficient of variation (CV) in cell size, cell hexagonality and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured preoperatively and at postoperative first week, first and third month visits.Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with an applanation tonometer at every visit. Results: . There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean ECD all follow-up times when compared with the preoperative visit (p=0.000). In terms of mean ECD levels there was no significant difference between the two groups within three months postoperatively (p=0.616) In the first week after surgery, there was an significant increase in CCT in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively (p=0.000). The IOP was <23 mmHg in all of the patients on the first day after surgery. There was no significant difference in the incidence of IOP peaks between the two groups in every vizits. In both groups, a significant increase was observed in the mean IOP at first day, first week, and first month after surgery compared to preoperative values (p=0.000). But no significant difference in IOP increase in Group 1 (P=0.092), Group 2 (P=0.013) compared to preoperative values ​​at third month postoperatively (p <0.001 significant with Bonferrotti correction). Conclusion: The two OVD’s used in this study during cataract surgery were safe and effective. Both OVD’s resulted in similar rates of transient IOP increases and corneal endothelial damage also provided good anterior chamber depth and were fairly easy to remove.

scholarly journals Long-term changes in the refractive effect of a toric intraocular lens on astigmatism correction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Hayashi ◽  
Motoaki Yoshida ◽  
Shunsuke Hayashi ◽  
Akira Hirata
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Marked Change ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Astigmatism Correction ◽  
Ocular Residual Astigmatism ◽  
Long Term Changes

Abstract Purpose To examine the long-term changes in the astigmatism-correcting effect of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) after stabilization of surgically induced astigmatic changes due to cataract surgery. Methods Unilateral eyes of 120 patients that received a toric IOL for against-the-rule (ATR) or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism were enrolled. Manifest refractive and anterior corneal astigmatism, and ocular residual astigmatism which is mainly derived from internal optics were examined preoperatively, at approximately 2 months postoperatively (baseline) and at 5 ~ 10 years postbaseline. The astigmatism was decomposed to vertical/horizontal (Rx) and oblique components (Ry), which was compared between baseline and 5 ~ 10 years postbaseline. Results In the eyes having ATR astigmatism, the mean Rx and Ry of the manifest refractive and corneal astigmatism significantly changed toward ATR astigmatism between the baseline and 5 ~ 10 years postbaseline (p ≤ 0.0304), but those of ocular residual astigmatism did not change significantly between the 2 time points. In the eyes having WTR astigmatism, the Rx and Ry of refractive, corneal, and ocular residual astigmatism did not change significantly between the 2 time points. Double-angle plots revealed an ATR shift in refractive and corneal astigmatism and no marked change in the ocular residual astigmatism in the eyes with ATR astigmatism, and there is no change in this astigmatism in the eyes with WTR astigmatism. Conclusion The long-term changes with age in the effect of a toric IOL significantly deteriorated due to an ATR shift of corneal astigmatism in the eyes having ATR astigmatism, while it was maintained in eyes having WTR astigmatism, suggesting that ATR astigmatism should be overcorrected.

scholarly journals Clinical differences between toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation when myopia is determined as target refraction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da young Shin ◽  
Ho Sik Hwang ◽  
Hyun Seung Kim ◽  
Man Soo Kim ◽  
Eun Chul Kim
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Monofocal Iol ◽  
Target Refraction ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Background: The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the clinical results of toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal IOL implantation when the target refraction value is determined -3 diopter (D) in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D).Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients with corneal astigmatism >1.5D who underwent cataract surgery and their target refraction is determined -3D. 100 eyes (100 patients; monofocal IOL, 60; toric IOL, 40) were enrolled in the current study. Near and distant uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected VA, spherical equivalent and refractive, corneal astigmatism were evaluated before and after surgery.Results: The near UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.26±0.33) after cataract surgery was significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.48±0.32) (p=0.030). The distant UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.38 ± 0.14) was also significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.55 ± 0.22) (p = 0.026). There were no significant intergroup differences in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.710) and mean spherical equivalent (p = 0.465). In the toric IOL group, postoperative refractive astigmatism was -0.80 ± 0.46D and postoperative corneal astigmatism was -1.50 ± 0.62D, whereas the corresponding values in the monofocal IOL group were -1.65 ± 0.77D and -1.45 ± 0.64D; residual refractive astigmatism was significantly lower with toric IOL implantation compared with monofocal IOL implantation (p = 0.001). There were no postoperative complications and no adverse events were reported.Conclusions: When myopic refraction such as -3D was determined as the target power in patients with corneal astigmatism, toric IOL implantation led to excellent improvement in both near and distant UCVA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document