rms errors
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

88
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 3137
Author(s):  
Kunjabihari Swain ◽  
Murthy Cherukuri ◽  
Sunil Kumar Mishra ◽  
Bhargav Appasani ◽  
Suprava Patnaik ◽  
...  

This paper presents a Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench (LabVIEW) and Internet of Things (IoT)-based eHealth monitoring system called LI-Care to facilitate the diagnosis of the health condition cost-effectively. The system measures the heart rate, body temperature, blood pressure, oxygen level, and breathing rate, and provides an electrocardiogram (ECG). The required sensors are integrated on a web-based application that keeps track of the essential parameters and gives an alarm indication if one or more physiological parameters go beyond the safe level. It also employs a webcam to obtain the patient view at any time. LabVIEW enables the effortless interfacing of various biomedical sensors with the computer and provides high-speed data acquisition and interactive visualizations. It also provides a web publishing tool to access the interactive window remotely through a web browser. The web-based application is accessible to doctors who are experts in that particular field. They can obtain the real-time reading and directly perform a diagnosis. The parameters measured by the proposed system were validated using the traditional measurement systems, and the Root Mean Square (RMS) errors were obtained for the various parameters. The maximum RMS error as a percentage was 0.159%, which was found in the temperature measurement, and its power consumption is 1 Watt/h. The other RMS errors were 0.05% in measurement of systolic pressure, 0.029% in measurement of diastolic pressure, 0.059% in measurement of breathing rate, 0.002% in measurement of heart rate, 0.076% in measurement of oxygen level, and 0.015% in measurement of ECG. The low RMS errors and ease of deployment make it an attractive alternative for traditional monitoring systems. The proposed system has potential applications in hospitals, nursing homes, remote monitoring of the elderly, non-contact monitoring, etc.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Omkar Lakshmi Jagan ◽  
S. Koteswara Rao

PurposeDoppler-Bearing Tracking (DBT) is commonly used in target tracking applications for the underwater environment using the Hull-Mounted Sensor (HMS). It is an important and challenging problem in an underwater environment.Design/methodology/approachThe system nonlinearity in an underwater environment increases due to several reasons such as the type of measurements taken, the speeds of target and observer, environmental conditions, number of sensors considered for measurements and so on. Degrees of nonlinearity (DoNL) for these problems are analyzed using a proposed measure of nonlinearity (MoNL) for state estimation.FindingsIn this research, the authors analyzed MoNL for state estimation and computed the conditional MoNL (normalized) using different filtering algorithms where measurements are obtained from a single sensor array (i.e. HMS). MoNL is implemented to find out the system nonlinearity for different filtering algorithms and identified how much nonlinear the system is, that is, to measure nonlinearity of a problem.Originality/valueAlgorithms are evaluated for various scenarios with different angles on the target bow (ATB) in Monte-Carlo simulation. Computation of root mean squared (RMS) errors in position and velocity is carried out to assess the state estimation accuracy using MATLAB.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiutong Lin ◽  
Tao Sun ◽  
Xiao Liu ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Yong Yin

Abstract Background and purpose: The study evaluated the differences in leaf positioning deviations by the log files of three advanced accelerators with two delivery techniques, and established specific assessment parameters of leaf positioning deviations for different types of accelerators.Methods: A total of 300 treatment plans with 5 consecutive treatment log files were collected from the Trilogy, TrueBeam and Halcyon accelerators. 50 IMRT and 50 VMAT plans were selected randomly on each accelerator. The log files information was parsed by SunCheck software from Sun Nuclear Corporation. The maximum leaf RMS errors, 95th percentile errors and percentages of different leaf positioning errors were statistically analyzed. The correlations between these evaluation parameters and accelerator performance parameters (maximum leaf speed, mean leaf speed, gantry and arc angle) were analyzed.Results: The average maximum leaf RMS errors of the Trilogy in the IMRT and VMAT plans were 0.45±0.1mm and 0.80±0.07mm, respectively, which were higher than the TrueBeam's 0.03±0.01mm, 0.03±0.01 mm and the Halcyon's 0.06±0.01 mm, 0.07±0.01mm. Similar data results were shown in the 95th percentile error. The maximum leaf RMS errors were strongly correlated with the 95th percentile errors. The leaf positioning deviations in VMAT were higher than those in IMRT for all accelerators. In TrueBeam and Halcyon, leaf position errors above 1 mm were not found in IMRT and VMAT plans. The main influencing factor of leaf positioning deviation was the leaf speed, which has no correlation with gantry and arc angles.Conclusions: Compared with the quality assurance guidelines, the MLC positioning deviations tolerances of the three accelerators should be tightened. For both IMRT and VMAT techniques, the 95th percentile error and the maximum RMS error are suggested to be tightened to 1.5 mm and 1 mm for the Trilogy accelerator respectively. In TrueBeam and Halcyon accelerators, the 95th percentile error and maximum RMS error of 1 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively, are considered appropriate.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimmo Ruosteenoja ◽  

In this report, we have evaluated the performance of nearly 40 global climate models (GCMs) participating in Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The focus is on the northern European area, but the ability to simulate southern European and global climate is discussed as well. Model evaluation was started with a technical control; completely unrealistic values in the GCM output files were identified by seeking the absolute minimum and maximum values. In this stage, one GCM was rejected totally, and furthermore individual output files from two other GCMs. In evaluating the remaining GCMs, the primary tool was the Model Climate Performance Index (MCPI) that combines RMS errors calculated for the different climate variables into one index. The index takes into account both the seasonal and spatial variations in climatological means. Here, MCPI was calculated for the period 1981—2010 by comparing GCM output with the ERA-Interim reanalyses. Climate variables explored in the evaluation were the surface air temperature, precipitation, sea level air pressure and incoming solar radiation at the surface. Besides MCPI, we studied RMS errors in the seasonal course of the spatial means by examining each climate variable separately. Furthermore, the evaluation procedure considered model performance in simulating past trends in the global-mean temperature, the compatibility of future responses to different greenhouse-gas scenarios and the number of available scenario runs. Daily minimum and maximum temperatures were likewise explored in a qualitative sense, but owing to the non-existence of data from multiple GCMs, these variables were not incorporated in the quantitative validation. Four of the 37 GCMs that had passed the initial technical check were regarded as wholly unusable for scenario calculations: in two GCMs the responses to the different greenhouse gas scenarios were contradictory and in two other GCMs data were missing from one of the four key climate variables. Moreover, to reduce inter-GCM dependencies, no more than two variants of any individual GCM were included; this led to an abandonment of one GCM. The remaining 32 GCMs were divided into three quality classes according to the assessed performance. The users of model data can utilize this grading to select a subset of GCMs to be used in elaborating climate projections for Finland or adjacent areas. Annual-mean temperature and precipitation projections for Finland proved to be nearly identical regardless of whether they were derived from the entire ensemble or by ignoring models that had obtained the lowest scores. Solar radiation projections were somewhat more sensitive.


Author(s):  
John Herbert Marr

Hubble expansion may be considered as a velocity per photon travel time rather than as velocity or redshift per distance. Dimensionally, this is an acceleration and will have an associated curvature of space under general relativity. This paper explores this theoretical curvature as an extension to the spacetime manifold of general relativity, generating a modified solution with three additional non-zero Christoffel symbols, and a reformulated Ricci tensor and curvature. The observational consequences of this reformulation were compared with the ΛCDM model for luminosity distance using the extensive type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) data with redshift corrected to the CMB, and for angular diameter distance with the recent baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) data. For the SNe Ia data, the modified GR and ΛCDM models differed by −0.15+0.11μB mag. over zcmb=0.01−1.3, with overall weighted RMS errors of ±0.136μB mag for modified GR and ±0.151μB mag for ΛCDM espectively. The BAO measures spanned a range z=0.106−2.36, with weighted RMS errors of ±0.034 Mpc with H0=67.6±0.25 for the modified GR model, and ±0.085 Mpc with H0=70.0±0.25 for the ΛCDM model. The derived GR metric for this new solution describes both the SNe Ia and the BAO observations with comparable accuracy to ΛCDM without requiring the inclusion of dark matter or w’-corrected dark energy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2244
Author(s):  
Zeeshan Javed ◽  
Aimon Tanvir ◽  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
Wenjing Su ◽  
Congzi Xia ◽  
...  

Recently, the occurrence of fog and haze over China has increased. The retrieval of trace gases from the multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) is challenging under these conditions. In this study, various reported retrieval settings for formaldehyde (HCHO) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) are compared to evaluate the performance of these settings under different meteorological conditions (clear day, haze, and fog). The dataset from 1st December 2019 to 31st March 2020 over Nanjing, China, is used in this study. The results indicated that for HCHO, the optimal settings were in the 324.5–359 nm wavelength window with a polynomial order of five. At these settings, the fitting and root mean squared (RMS) errors for column density were considerably improved for haze and fog conditions, and the differential slant column densities (DSCDs) showed more accurate values compared to the DSCDs between 336.5 and 359 nm. For SO2, the optimal settings for retrieval were found to be at 307–328 nm with a polynomial order of five. Here, root mean square (RMS) and fitting errors were significantly lower under all conditions. The observed HCHO and SO2 vertical column densities were significantly lower on fog days compared to clear days, reflecting a decreased chemical production of HCHO and aqueous phase oxidation of SO2 in fog droplets.


Geomatics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-287
Author(s):  
Abdelsatar Elmezayen ◽  
Ahmed El-Rabbany

The rapid rise of ultra-low-cost dual-frequency GNSS chipsets and micro-electronic-mechanical-system (MEMS) inertial sensors makes it possible to develop low-cost navigation systems, which meet the requirements for many applications, including self-driving cars. This study proposes the use of a dual-frequency u-blox F9P GNSS receiver with xsens MTi670 industrial-grade MEMS IMU to develop an ultra-low-cost tightly coupled (TC) triple-constellation GNSS PPP/INS integrated system for precise land vehicular applications. The performance of the proposed system is assessed through comparison with three different TC GNSS PPP/INS integrated systems. The first system uses the Trimble R9s geodetic-grade receiver with the tactical-grade Stim300 IMU, the second system uses the u-blox F9P receiver with the Stim300 IMU, while the third system uses the Trimble R9s receiver with the xsens MTi670 IMU. An improved robust adaptive Kalman filter is adopted and used in this study due to its ability to reduce the effect of measurement outliers and dynamic model errors on the obtained positioning and attitude accuracy. Real-time precise ephemeris and clock products from the Centre National d’Etudes Spatials (CNES) are used to mitigate the effects of orbital and satellite clock errors. Three land vehicular field trials were carried out to assess the performance of the proposed system under both open-sky and challenging environments. It is shown that the tracking capability of the GNSS receiver is the dominant factor that limits the positioning accuracy, while the IMU grade represents the dominant factor for the attitude accuracy. The proposed TC triple-constellation GNSS PPP/INS integrated system achieves sub-meter-level positioning accuracy in both of the north and up directions, while it achieves meter-level positioning accuracy in the east direction. Sub-meter-level positioning accuracy is achieved when the Stim300 IMU is used with the u-blox F9P GNSS receiver. In contrast, decimeter-level positioning accuracy is consistently achieved through TC GNSS PPP/INS integration when a geodetic-grade GNSS receiver is used, regardless of whether a tactical- or an industrial-grade IMU is used. The root mean square (RMS) errors of the proposed system’s attitude are about 0.878°, 0.804°, and 2.905° for the pitch, roll, and azimuth angles, respectively. The RMS errors of the attitude are significantly improved to reach about 0.034°, 0.038°, and 0.280° for the pitch, roll, and azimuth angles, respectively, when a tactical-grade IMU is used, regardless of whether a geodetic- or low-cost GNSS receiver is used.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kawahara

Abstract Background To determine the preoperative factors influencing refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery for astigmatism correction by toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and to evaluate the prediction model using these factors. Methods Prospective, observational case series. The right eyes of forty consecutive patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of the total cornea of 1.5 diopters (D) or more in magnitude and scheduled for implantation of a non-toric IOL during cataract surgery with a 2.4-mm temporal clear corneal incision were examined prospectively. The vertical/horizontal astigmatism component (J0) and oblique astigmatism component (J45) of refractive and corneal astigmatism were converted using power vector analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed with refractive astigmatism at three months postoperatively as the dependent variable, and preoperative parameters including age, sex, refractive astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, sphere, spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, lens positions (tilt and decentration), axial length, and corneal higher order aberrations as independent variables. The root mean square (RMS) errors were calculated to express the regression model fit. Results The regression model for the J0 component was $$ Postoperative\kern0.34em refractive\kern0.2em J0=1.05\times Coneal\kern0.2em J0-0.14 $$ P o s t o p e r a t i v e r e f r a c t i v e J 0 = 1.05 × C o n e a l J 0 − 0.14 (R2 = 0.96, P < 0.001). The model for the J45 component was $$ Postoperative\kern0.34em refractive\kern0.2em J45=0.68\times Coneal\kern0.2em J45+0.19\times Preoperative\kern0.34em refractive\kern0.2em J45-0.06 $$ P o s t o p e r a t i v e r e f r a c t i v e J 45 = 0.68 × C o n e a l J 45 + 0.19 × P r e o p e r a t i v e r e f r a c t i v e J 45 − 0.06 (R2 = 0.72, P < 0.001). The mean RMS errors for preoperative corneal astigmatism alone and the multivariate model were 0.58 D and 0.46 D, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.02). Conclusions Refractive astigmatism after implantation of a toric IOL can be predicted by the regression model more accurately than by corneal astigmatism alone. However, the prediction of oblique astigmatism remains a challenge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-46
Author(s):  
Radhika A. CHIPADE ◽  
Thekke Variyam RAMANATHAN

BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) is composed of satellites in geostationary Earth orbit (GEO), medium Earth orbit (MEO) and inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO). However, the orbit determination of geostationary Earth orbits and of geosynchronous orbits (GSO) with small inclination angle and small eccentricity is a challenging task that is addressed in this paper using Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). The satellite positions were predicted in Earth-centred inertial (ECI) reference frame when propagated through Keplerian model and perturbation force model for different values of right ascension of ascending node (RAAN). Root mean square (RMS) errors of 9.61 cm, 6.73 cm and 11.46 cm were observed in ECI X, Y and Z satellite position coordinates of GSO respectively, whereas, the RMS errors for GEO satellite were 8.89 cm, 7.92 cm, and 0.93 cm respectively in ECI X, Y and Z coordinates; for perturbation force model with maximum value of RAAN when compared with dynamic orbit determination model. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for EKF reported a p-value > 0.05, indicating a good fit of perturbation force model for orbit propagation. Orbit determination using EKF with perturbation force model were compared with that using EKF with Kepler's model. Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare the residuals from EKF algorithm through Kepler's model and perturbation force model. EKF with Perturbation force model showed improvement in predicting the satellite positions as compared to Kepler's model. EKF with Perturbation force model was further applied to International GNSS Service (IGS) station data and kilometre level accuracy was achieved. RMS errors of 0.75 km, 2.53 km and 1.91 km were observed in ECI X, Y and Z satellite position coordinates of GSO, respectively, whereas, the RMS errors for GEO satellite were 3.89 km, 4.20 km and 6.66 km respectively in ECI X, Y and Z coordinates for perturbation force model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document