scholarly journals Comparison of Military Health System Data Repository and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arin L. Madenci ◽  
Cathaleen K. Madsen ◽  
Nicollette K. Kwon ◽  
Lindsey L. Wolf ◽  
Kristin A. Sonderman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Given the rarity of pediatric surgical disease, it is important to consider available large-scale data resources as a means to better study and understand relevant disease-processes and their treatments. The Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) includes claims-based information for > 3 million pediatric patients who are dependents of members and retirees of the United States Armed Services, but has not been externally validated. We hypothesized that demographics and selected outcome metrics would be similar between MDR and the previously validated American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) for several common pediatric surgical operations. Methods We selected five commonly performed pediatric surgical operations: appendectomy, pyeloplasty, pyloromyotomy, spinal arthrodesis for scoliosis, and facial reconstruction for cleft palate. Among children who underwent these operations, we compared demographics (age, sex, and race) and clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay [LOS] and mortality) in the MDR and NSQIP-P, including all available overlapping years (2012–2014). Results Age, sex, and race were generally similar between the NSQIP-P and MDR. Specifically, these demographics were generally similar between the resources for appendectomy (NSQIP-P, n = 20,602 vs. MDR, n = 4363; median age 11 vs. 12 years; female 40% vs. 41%; white 75% vs. 84%), pyeloplasty (NSQIP-P, n = 786 vs. MDR, n = 112; median age 0.9 vs. 2 years; female 28% vs. 28%; white 71% vs. 80%), pyloromyotomy, (NSQIP-P, n = 3827 vs. MDR, n = 227; median age 34 vs. < 1 year, female 17% vs. 16%; white 76% vs. 89%), scoliosis surgery (NSQIP-P, n = 5743 vs. MDR, n = 95; median age 14.2 vs. 14 years; female 75% vs. 67%; white 72% vs. 75%), and cleft lip/palate repair (NSQIP-P, n = 6202 vs. MDR, n = 749; median age, 1 vs. 1 year; female 42% vs. 45%; white 69% vs. 84%). Length of stay and 30-day mortality were similar between resources. LOS and 30-day mortality were also similar between datasets. Conclusion For the selected common pediatric surgical operations, patients included in the MDR were comparable to those included in the validated NSQIP-P. The MDR may comprise a valuable clinical outcomes research resource, especially for studying infrequent diseases with follow-up beyond the 30-day peri-operative period.

2020 ◽  
Vol 185 (9-10) ◽  
pp. e1590-e1595
Author(s):  
Steffanie Owens ◽  
Tara Blando ◽  
Yohannes B Tesema ◽  
Elizabeth Butts ◽  
Jessica Newton ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Despite an increasing number of female service members, incidence rates of gynecologic cancers (other than cervical cancer) have not been previously documented in the U.S. active duty military population. This study sought to determine the incidence rates of all gynecologic, including peritoneal, malignancies in the U.S. Active Duty population compared to the general US population as reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Materials and Methods Gynecologic cancers diagnosed in U.S. Active Duty women aged 20–59 between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively ascertained. Cancer cases were identified in both the Automated Central Tumor Registry and the Military Health System Data Repository. All cases in Automated Central Tumor Registry plus cases recorded in Military Health System Data Repository, but not duplicative of Automated Central Tumor Registry cases, were included. Age-specific and age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated in military and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cases. Results In U.S. Active Duty women, 327 incident cases of gynecologic cancer were identified. There were 110 cases of cervical cancer, 40 cases of endometrial cancer, 152 cases of ovarian cancer, and 25 other gynecologic malignancies. Of the 327 cases, 154 were ascertained from the Automated Central Tumor Registry database and the remainder from Military Health System Data Repository claims data. The age-adjusted rate of all gynecologic cancers for U.S. Active Duty women was 49.17 per 105 (95%CI 37.58, 65.12), while the age-adjusted rate for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results −18 was 42.09 per 105 (95%CI 41.83, 42.35). The kappa coefficient assessing the overlap between the data sources was −0.1937. Though insufficient in numbers for statistical analysis, the observed proportion of ovarian to cervical cancer cases in active duty women &lt; 45 years of age was substantially greater than in the general population. Conclusions U.S. Active Duty women exhibited a similar age-adjusted rate of gynecologic cancer as the general US population. There was suboptimal overlap between the Automated Central Tumor Registry and Military Health System Data Repository databases, indicating the necessity of using both databases in order to obtain reliable data in the active duty population. This study is the current best estimate of a baseline rate of gynecologic cancer in U.S. active duty military women. This rate might change over time as women’s roles and exposures in recent and future military conflicts evolve.


2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (7-8) ◽  
pp. e1057-e1064
Author(s):  
William Patrick Luan ◽  
Todd C Leroux ◽  
Cara Olsen ◽  
Douglas Robb ◽  
Jonathan S Skinner ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Within the Military Health System (MHS), facilities have struggled to meet minimum recommended volume thresholds for certain procedures. Understanding variations in complication rates and cost can help policymakers tailor policy to target improvement. Our objective was to quantify the variation in bariatric surgery complication rates and costs across a sample of military hospitals. Materials and Methods: We study a retrospective cohort of 38 military surgeons practicing in 21 military treatment facilities from 2007 to 2014 who performed 1,277 bariatric surgeries. Data from the Centralized Credentials and Quality Assurance System, which provides education and training characteristics of physicians, were linked to patient encounter data from the MHS Data Repository. Physicians were included if they performed at least five bariatric surgeries over the study period. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of obesity (body mass index &gt; 30) and underwent a bariatric weight loss surgery. We calculated and summarized inpatient costs and complication rates across both surgeons and facilities using multivariable mixed-effects linear or logistic models. We used these models to calculate adjusted complication rates and average costs across both providers and hospitals to characterize variation in bariatric outcomes within the MHS. This study was considered exempt by the Uniformed Services University Institutional Review Board. Results: We find evidence of large variations in both complication rates and costs per admission. Overall, we found a 15.5% complication rate across the sample. When comparing averages across facilities, we find large variation in complications (49.4% coefficient of variation [CV]) and procedure costs (25.9% CV). Controlling for patient comorbidities, BMI, and year attenuates much of the variation (12.6% CV complications, 4.4% CV cost), but cannot completely explain differences across facilities. Our model suggests that complications cost 32% more than complication-free surgeries on average suggesting that quality improvement efforts could potentially yield large savings. Conclusions: We find large variations in complication rates even after controlling for patient health. Furthermore, surgical complications are a significant determinant of cost. Policymakers should target efforts to improve surgical quality across facilities and physicians. Surgical quality improvement initiatives could produce savings to the MHS through reduced complications and improved surgical readiness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document