scholarly journals Erratum to: The GOOD life: Study protocol for a social norms intervention to reduce alcohol and other drug use among Danish adolescents

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Stock ◽  
Lotte Vallentin-Holbech ◽  
Birthe Marie Rasmussen
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Stock ◽  
l Vallentin-Holbech

Abstract Social norm theory suggests that students often overestimate the frequency and quantity of drug use among their peers (descriptive norms) as well as how acceptable their peers feel these risky behaviours to be (injunctive norms) and tend to match their own behaviour to this incorrect perception. This study aims to investigate whether a Danish social norms based intervention (The GOOD Life) using both descriptive and injunctive normative information may change students perception of peers' attitudes towards smoking, drinking and using cannabis. In total 38 schools were included in a cluster-randomised controlled trial and allocated to either intervention (n = 641) or control group (n = 714) during 2015/2016. Students (aged 13-17 years) from both groups completed an online survey before the intervention and 3 months after baseline. The GOOD Life intervention provided normative feedback tailored for each school-grade using three communication channels: classroom sessions, posters and web application. Outcome measures were perception of peers' attitude towards: smoking, drinking alcohol, getting drunk and using cannabis. All with five response options from 'never okay' (1) to 'okay' (5). Intervention effects at follow-up were examined using ordinal logistic regression models and marginal effect-estimates. Students in the intervention group were less likely to perceive peers to approve of smoking (Coef: -0.22, p = 0.04, 95%CI [-0.43; -0.01]). The marginal effect estimates showed that compared to the control group, students in the intervention group were 5% more likely to perceive that peers think it is never okay to smoke, 3% less likely to perceive that peers think it is okay to smoke occasionally and 1% less likely to perceive that peers think it is okay to smoke frequently. No significant effects were found for injunctive norms regarding alcohol consumption and cannabis use. Key messages The intervention The GOOD life has potential to produce change in perceived injunctive norms among Danish adolescents. Prevention programmes should thoroughly consider how to incorporate injunctive normative feedback.


Author(s):  
Christiane Stock ◽  
Satayesh Lavasani Kjær ◽  
Birthe Rasmussen ◽  
Lotte Vallentin-Holbech

Background: Normative feedback is an intervention strategy commonly used in drug prevention programmes. This study collected process evaluation data about how programme recipients engage with social norms (SN) feedback in The GOOD Life intervention and how they experience it. Methods: Eight focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 44 adolescents (pupils aged 14–16 years) who have participated in the social-norms-based intervention The GOOD Life. The interviews focused on three topics: (1) interest in and impact of the intervention; (2) perception of the intervention elements; and (3) suggestions for improvement of The GOOD Life. They were transcribed and analysed with content analysis. Results: The analysis revealed that The GOOD Life motivated pupils to re-evaluate their own drug use behaviour and overall met their interest regarding receiving engaging and non-moral forms of drug prevention programmes. While pupils perceived the normative feedback session in the classroom and the posters with SN messages as positive, stimulating and surprising, the web-based application with SN feedback was rarely used and less positively evaluated. Anonymity and confidentiality were regarded as essential to provide honest answers in the poll. The pupils suggested even more variety in ways to engage them and to use more gaming elements. Conclusions: SN feedback was well perceived by adolescents. The intervention met their interest and needs and was able to achieve the intended impact of challenging norm perceptions. Anonymity and confidentiality are key in order to build trust and engage adolescents in the intervention.


Author(s):  
David Wood

Habit rules our lives. And yet climate change and the catastrophic future it portends, makes it clear that we cannot go on like this. Our habits are integral to narratives of the good life, to social norms and expectations, as well as to economic reality. Such shared shapes are vital. Yet while many of our individual habits seem perfectly reasonable, when aggregated together they spell disaster. Beyond consumerism, other forms of life and patterns of dwelling are clearly possible. But how can we get there from here? This book shows how an approach to philosophy attuned to our ecological existence can suspend the taken-for-granted and open up alternative forms of earthly dwelling. Sharing the earth, as we do, raises fundamental questions. Deconstruction exposes all manner of exclusion, violence to the other, and silent subordination. Phenomenology and Whitehead's process philosophy offer further resources for an ecological imagination. The book plots experiential pathways that disrupt our habitual existence and challenge our everyday complacency. It shows how living responsibly with the earth means affirming the ways in which we are vulnerable, receptive, and dependent, and the need for solidarity all round. If we take seriously values like truth, justice, and compassion we must be willing to contemplate that the threat we pose to the earth might demand our own species' demise. Yet we have the capacity to live responsibly. In an unfashionable but spirited defense of an enlightened anthropocentrism, the book argues that to deserve the privileges of Reason we must demonstrably deploy it through collective sustainable agency. Only in this way can we reinhabit the earth.


1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 667-668
Author(s):  
Isaac Prilleltensky
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document