scholarly journals Patient-reported quality of life after primary major joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe H. Dailiana ◽  
Ippolyti Papakostidou ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Lycurgos Liaropoulos ◽  
Elias Zintzaras ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake von Hintze ◽  
Mika Niemeläinen ◽  
Harri Sintonen ◽  
Jyrki Nieminen ◽  
Antti Eskelinen

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term clinical, radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes and define the survival rate in patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the single rotating hinged knee (RHK) design. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2013, 125 revision TKAs were performed at our institution using the single RHK implant. We conducted both a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data of these patients and a prospective follow-up study of all 39 living patients (41 knees). The follow-up phase included an optional extra follow-up visit, PROM questionnaires, and plain radiographs. Results The ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the revision RHK knees was 81.7% (95% CI 71.9–91.6%) with re-revision for any reason as the endpoint. Overall, 15 knees (12% of the total) underwent re-revision surgery during the follow-up. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0–12.7 years) post-operatively for the baseline group. One mechanical hinge mechanism-related failure occurred without any history of trauma or infection. At the time of the final follow-up, the majority of patients evinced a fairly good clinical outcome measured with patient-reported outcome measures and none of the components were radiographically loose. Conclusion We found that in patients undergoing complex revision TKA, fairly good functional outcome and quality of life can be achieved using an RHK implant. Further, it seems that in this type of patient cohort, revision TKA using an RHK implant relieves pain more than it improves ability to function. The NexGen® RHK design can be regarded as a suitable option in complex revision TKA.


2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692095223
Author(s):  
H. J. A. Miettinen ◽  
N. Mäkirinne-Kallio ◽  
H. Kröger ◽  
S. S. A. Miettinen

Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the health-related quality of life before and after a hip and a knee arthroplasty operation using a 15D instrument and to compare these scores to the Finnish control population 15D scores. Materials and Methods: The pre- and post-operative data of 15D were prospective collected from the patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty at the Kuopio University Hospital. Post-operative data were collected at 6 and 12 months after the operation. Results: The mean change of the 15D score after hip arthroplasty was +0.062 and after knee arthroplasty, it was +0.033 at the 12-month follow-up ( p < 0.001). Total hip arthroplasty patients of all ages reached the control population 15D scores at the 12-month follow-up. Of the total knee arthroplasty patients, only patients aged >75 years and males aged 55–64 years did reach control population 15D scores at the 12-month follow-up. Patients experienced a statistically significant improvement in mobility, vision, sleeping, usual activities, discomfort and symptoms, distress, and vitality ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Successful hip and knee arthroplasty operations improve patients’ health-related quality of life. According to this study, hip arthroplasty improves the health-related quality of life more than knee arthroplasty.


2001 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 454 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Allyson Jones ◽  
Donald C. Voaklander ◽  
D. William C. Johnston ◽  
Maria E. Suarez-Almazor

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Seow-Hng Goh ◽  
Ming Han Lincoln Liow ◽  
Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak ◽  
Darren Keng-Jin Tay ◽  
Ngai-Nung Lo ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. e61
Author(s):  
Elie S. Ghanem ◽  
Ian Pawasarat ◽  
Adam D. Lindsay ◽  
Khalid Azzam ◽  
Camilo Restrepo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1233-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. F. Peter ◽  
J. Dekker ◽  
C. Tilbury ◽  
R. L. Tordoir ◽  
S. H. M. Verdegaal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinghui Chang ◽  
Manru Fu ◽  
Peihua Cao ◽  
Changhai Ding ◽  
Dong Wang

Abstract Background: To identify patients’ self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine factors contributing to any heterogeneity in HRQoL. Methods: This prospective multicentre study included 404 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent TKA between 1 April and 30 December 2019 and in whom HRQoL was assessed preoperatively and at 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Sociodemographic characteristics were assessed using a general information questionnaire; disability, using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; pain, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score; and HRQoL, using the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level (EQ-5D-5L) score. Potential heterogeneity and factors influencing longitudinal changes in HRQoL were analysed using a growth mixture model.Results: The mean EQ-5D-5L score improved from 0.69 preoperatively to 0.90 at 6 months postoperatively. Two types of longitudinal heterogeneity were identified: (1) a group of patients with a small and slow improvement in HRQoL and (2) a group of patients who showed marked and rapid improvement in HRQoL. The main characteristics of the latter group were a monthly family income >2000 yuan, exercising for approximately 30 min daily, and better knee function at baseline. Baseline knee function and change in knee function were significantly associated with the percentage change in HRQoL.Conclusions: HRQoL improved considerably after TKA. However, there was some heterogeneity in the changes in HRQoL depending on certain patient characteristics. Targeted interventions should focus on these differences to optimise the outcomes of TKA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (9) ◽  
pp. 1183-1193
Author(s):  
Hiba K. Anis ◽  
Gregory J. Strnad ◽  
Alison K. Klika ◽  
Alexander Zajichek ◽  
Kurt P. Spindler ◽  
...  

Aims The purpose of this study was to develop a personalized outcome prediction tool, to be used with knee arthroplasty patients, that predicts outcomes (lengths of stay (LOS), 90 day readmission, and one-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on an individual basis and allows for dynamic modifiable risk factors. Methods Data were prospectively collected on all patients who underwent total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a between July 2015 and June 2018. Cohort 1 (n = 5,958) was utilized to develop models for LOS and 90 day readmission. Cohort 2 (n = 2,391, surgery date 2015 to 2017) was utilized to develop models for one-year improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain score, KOOS function score, and KOOS quality of life (QOL) score. Model accuracies within the imputed data set were assessed through cross-validation with root mean square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors (MAEs) for the LOS and PROMs models, and the index of prediction accuracy (IPA), and area under the curve (AUC) for the readmission models. Model accuracies in new patient data sets were assessed with AUC. Results Within the imputed datasets, the LOS (RMSE 1.161) and PROMs models (RMSE 15.775, 11.056, 21.680 for KOOS pain, function, and QOL, respectively) demonstrated good accuracy. For all models, the accuracy of predicting outcomes in a new set of patients were consistent with the cross-validation accuracy overall. Upon validation with a new patient dataset, the LOS and readmission models demonstrated high accuracy (71.5% and 65.0%, respectively). Similarly, the one-year PROMs improvement models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting ten-point improvements in KOOS pain (72.1%), function (72.9%), and QOL (70.8%) scores. Conclusion The data-driven models developed in this study offer scalable predictive tools that can accurately estimate the likelihood of improved pain, function, and quality of life one year after knee arthroplasty as well as LOS and 90 day readmission. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1183–1193.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document