scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome after patient-specific unicondylar knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola Freigang ◽  
Markus Rupp ◽  
Christian Pfeifer ◽  
Michael Worlicek ◽  
Stefan Radke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Leg Axis ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Unicondylar knee arthroplasty was introduced in the late 1960s and remains a topic of controversial discussion. Patient-specific instruments and patient-specific implants are not yet the standard of care. The question remains whether this time-consuming and costly technique can be beneficial for the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a custom-made unicondylar knee arthroplasty leads to improved patient-reported outcome. Methods This retrospective study evaluates the patient-reported outcome after custom-made unicondylar knee arthroplasty (CM-UKA, ConforMIS™ iUni® G2, ConforMIS Inc., Billerica, MA, USA). We evaluated 29 patients (31 knees) at an average of 2.4 years (range 1.2–3.6 years) after operation for unicondylar osteoarthritis of the knee. The target zone for the postoperative leg axis was a slight under-correction of 0–2° varus. Follow-up evaluation included the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a radiographic evaluation including a long-leg radiograph. Primary outcome measure was patient satisfaction based on the Forgotten Joint Score. Results We found an excellent postoperative health-related quality of life with a mean FJS of 76.8 (SD 17.9) indicating a low level of joint awareness after CM-UKA. The mean preoperative KSS was 66.0 (SD 13.71) and 59.4 (17.9) for the KSS function score. The increase was 22.8 points for the KSS knee score (p < 0.0001) and 34.8 points for the KSS function score (p < 0.0001). The VAS for pain decreased from a mean of 5.4 (SD 1.8) to 1.1 (SD 1.2) (p < 0.0001). The malalignment rate with a postoperative deviation of more than 2° in the leg axis was 29%. There was no evidence of component loosening after a mean follow-up of 2.4 years. Conclusions Custom-made unicondylar knee arthroplasty (CM-UKA) can provide improved clinical and functional outcomes for patients with isolated knee osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. We found excellent results regarding patient satisfaction and a low malalignment rate for CM-UKA. Further studies are needed to investigate long-term survivorship of the implant. Level of evidence Level IV. Trial registration Trial Registration number: Z-2014-0389-10 Regensburg Clinical Studies Center (REGCSC) 09/07/2014.

Midterm results of a new personalized knee implant for total knee arthroplasty: implant survivorship and patient-reported outcome after five years’ follow-up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Dauder Gallego ◽  
Irene Blanca Moreno Fenoll ◽  
José Luis Patiño Contreras ◽  
Francisco Javier Moreno Coronas ◽  
María del Carmen Torrejón de la Cal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Midterm Results ◽  
Implant Survivorship ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

Mid-Term Evaluation of the Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with BMI of 40 or Greater

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Seth ◽  
Johanna Dobransky ◽  
Waleed Albishi ◽  
Geoffrey F. Dervin
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Reported

AbstractLimited evidence is available on mid-term follow-up for patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 receiving a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The primary objective of this study was to investigate survival of the UKA in patients with BMI ≥ 40. Secondary objectives were to assess functional and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Survival analysis with endpoint revision of any component for any reason was conducted using Kaplan–Meier technique on 121 knees (103 patients) that underwent UKA with Oxford Phase 3 implant (Oxford Knee, Biomet, Swindon, United Kingdom) between September 2001 and March 2014 by seven surgeons. Survivorship differences were compared using Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) tests, and Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to assess predictors of failure. Preoperative PROMs were compared at 2 and 5 years postoperatively using paired t-tests. Mean age of patients was 58 years (43–75), mean BMI 43 kg/m2 (40–51), and mean follow-up 7 years (2 months to 15 years). Survival rate for the whole cohort was 92% at 2 years and 86% at 5 years. Females had a significantly higher revision rate than males (p = 0.043). A total of 19 knees required revision (16 to TKA, 2 polyethylene liner exchanges, and 1 femoral component and liner revision). With respect to PROMs, there was a significant improvement at 2 and 5 years (p < 0.001) on 4 of 5 knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score subscales. The mid-term survival rate for the Oxford UKA in patients with morbid obesity is similar to that of other nondesigner patient series with BMI ≥ 30, which provides further evidence for the safety of the implant in this patient population with significant improvements on PROMs at short and mid-term follow-up.

scholarly journals Patient reported and clinical outcomes of robotic-arm assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: Minimum two year follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 847-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Melvin Deese ◽  
Gwen Gratto-Cox ◽  
Denny A. Carter ◽  
Thomas M. Sasser ◽  
Karah L. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Patient Reported

Spinopelvic mismatch is associated with patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 15 years

The Knee ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 156-166
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Okamoto ◽  
Hitoshi Wakama ◽  
Tomohiro Okayoshi ◽  
Junya Matsuyama ◽  
Shuhei Otsuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals 3D printing and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 248-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth G. Jones ◽  
Susannah Clarke ◽  
Martin Jaere ◽  
Justin Cobb
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

In suitable patients, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers a number of advantages compared with total knee arthroplasty. However, the procedure is technically demanding, with a small tolerance for error. Assistive technology has the potential to improve the accuracy of implant positioning. This review paper describes the concept of detailed UKA planning in 3D, and the 3D printing technology that enables a plan to be delivered intraoperatively using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). The varying guide designs that enable accurate registration are discussed and described. The system accuracy is reported. Future studies need to ascertain whether accuracy for low-volume surgeons can be delivered in the operating theatre using PSI, and reflected in improved patient reported outcome measures, and lower revision rates.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180001

scholarly journals Midterm Outcomes Following Hip Labral Augmentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0024
Author(s):  
Joseph Ruzbarsky ◽  
Justin Arner ◽  
Karen Briggs ◽  
Marc Philippon ◽  
Rui Soares
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Iliotibial Band ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
Suction Seal

Objectives: Arthroscopic hip labral preservation techniques have evolved over the last decade. Arthroscopic hip labral augmentation with iliotibial band (ITB) autograft placed into a labral defect with viable circumferential fibers is a novel treatment option to restore the hip suction seal and improve functionality. The purpose of this study is to determine midterm (3-5 year follow up) outcomes of arthroscopic hip labral augmentation procedure. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral augmentation from August 2011 to March 2017 were prospectively evaluated. Pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome scores were compared and included SF12 PCS, SF12 MCS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS) (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport). Post-operative Tegner Activity Scale and patient satisfaction (1 – 10) were also evaluated. Results: One hundred and six patients underwent arthroscopic hip labral augmentation with minimum 3-year follow-up. Mean follow-up was 5-year follow-up (range, 3 to 9.2 years). All patient reported outcomes improved after labral augmentation (SF12 PCS 39±8 vs. 50±10, p>0.01; mHHS 59±15 vs. 79±21, p<0.01; WOMAC 31±16 vs. 16±17, p<0.01; HOS ADL 64±17 vs. 84±21, p<0.01; HOS Sport 41±22 vs. 71±29, p<0.01). Median post-operative Tegner score was 4. Median post-operative patient satisfaction was 9 out of 10 (range, 1-10). In terms of survivorship, 12 patients (11%) required revision surgery and 6 (5.7%) converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Conclusions: Arthroscopic hip labral augmentation is a successful treatment option for patients that have viable circumferential fibers present at the time of arthroscopy. This technique continues to show improved patient reported outcomes and is another hip labral preservation technique that may help reestablish the intra-articular fluid suction seal.

scholarly journals Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or less: a prospective study of 232 patients with 2-year follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Niemeläinen ◽  
T. Moilanen ◽  
H. Huhtala ◽  
A. Eskelinen
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Real World ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measure ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

Background and Aims:Previous studies have reported lower implant survival rates, residual pain, and higher patient dissatisfaction rates following knee arthroplasty in younger knee arthroplasty patients. We aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of knee arthroplasty in a prospective non-selected cohort of patients aged 65 years or less with 2-year follow-up.Material and Methods:In total, 250 patients (272 knees) aged 65 years or less were enrolled into this prospective cohort study. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess the outcome.Results:The mean Oxford Knee Score and all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales increased significantly (p < 0.001) from preoperative situation to the 2-year follow-up. Significant increase (p < 0.001) in physical activity was detected in High-Activity Arthroplasty Score and RAND-36 Physical Component Score (PCS). Pain was also significantly (p < 0.001) relieved during the follow-up. Total disappearance of pain was rare at 2 years. Patients with milder (Kellgren–Lawrence grade 2) osteoarthritis were less satisfied and reported poorer patient-reported outcome measure than those with advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3–4). There was no difference in the outcome (any patient-reported outcome measure) between patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and those who received unicondylar knee arthroplasty.Conclusion:We found that measured with a wide set of patient-reported outcome measures, both total knee arthroplasty and unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in significant pain relief, as well as improvement in physical performance and quality of life in patients aged 65 years or less. Real-world effectiveness of these procedures seems to be excellent. 15% of patients still had residual symptoms and were dissatisfied with the outcome at 2 years after the operation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document