scholarly journals Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs CRS alone for treatment of endometrial cancer with peritoneal metastases: a multi-institutional study from PSOGI and BIG RENAPE groups

BMC Surgery ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Gomes David ◽  
Naoual Bakrin ◽  
Julia Salleron ◽  
Marie Christine Kaminsky ◽  
Jean Marc Bereder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Treatment Data

Abstract Objective To investigate the benefit of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of endometrial peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to CRS alone. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicentre study of patients from experienced centres in treating peritoneal malignancies from 2002 to 2015. Patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal evolution of endometrial cancer (EC) were included. Two groups of 30 women were matched and compared: “CRS + HIPEC” which used HIPEC after CRS, and “CRS only” which did not use HIPEC. We analysed clinical, pathologic and treatment data for patients with peritoneal metastases from EC. The outcome measures were morbidity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results In “CRS plus HIPEC” group, 96.7% of women were treated for recurrence, while in “CRS only” 83.3 were treated for primary disease. There was no significant difference between Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index at laparotomy or Completeness of Cytoreduction score. Grade III and IV complications rates did not significantly differ between “CRS plus HIPEC” group and “CRS only” group (20.7% vs 20.7%, p = 0.739). Survival analysis showed no statistical difference between both groups. Median OS time was 19.2 months in “CRS plus HIPEC” group and 29.7 months in “CRS only” group (p = 0.606). Median PFS survival time was 10.7 months in “CRS plus HIPEC” group and 13.1 months in “CRS only” group (p = 0.511). Conclusion The use of HIPEC combined to CRS did not have any significance as regard the DFS and OS over CRS alone in patients with primary or recurrent peritoneal metastasis of endometrial cancer.

scholarly journals Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs CRS Alone for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Study from PSOGI and BIG RENAPE Groups

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel GOMES DAVID ◽  
N. Bakrin ◽  
J. Salleron ◽  
M. C. Kaminsky ◽  
J. M. Bereder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Treatment Data

Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the benefit of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of endometrial peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to CRS alone.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicentre study of patients from experienced centres in treating peritoneal malignancies from 2002 to 2015. Patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal evolution of endometrial cancer (EC) where included. Two groups of 30 women were matched and compared: “CRS +HIPEC” which used HIPEC after CRS, and “CRS only” which did not used HIPEC. We analysed clinical, pathologic and treatment data for patients with peritoneal metastases from EC. The outcome measures were morbidity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn “CRS plus HIPEC” group, 96,7% of women were treated for recurrence, while in “CRS only” 83,3 were treated for primary disease. There was no significant difference between Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index at laparotomy or Completeness of Cytoreduction score. Grade III and IV complications rates did not significantly differ between “CRS plus HIPEC” group and “CRS only” group (20.7% vs 20.7%, p=0.739). Survival analysis showed no statistical difference between both groups. Median OS time was 19.2 months in “CRS plus HIPEC” group and 29.7 months in “CRS only” group (p=0.606). Median PFS survival time was 10.7 months in “CRS plus HIPEC” group and 13.1 months in “CRS only” group (p=0.511).ConclusionThe use of HIPEC combined to CRS appears to be as effective, well tolerated and feasible as CRS alone in patients with primary or recurrent peritoneal metastasis of endometrial cancer.

scholarly journals Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliza W. Beal ◽  
Lorena P. Suarez-Kelly ◽  
Charles W. Kimbrough ◽  
Fabian M. Johnston ◽  
Jonathan Greer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CR-PM). However, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to CRS-HIPEC is poorly understood. A retrospective review of adult patients with CR-PM who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC from 2000–2017 was performed. Among 298 patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC, 196 (65.8%) received NAC while 102 (34.2%) underwent surgery first (SF). Patients who received NAC had lower peritoneal cancer index score (12.1 + 7.9 vs. 14.3 + 8.5, p = 0.034). There was no significant difference in grade III/IV complications (22.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.650), readmission (32.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.114), or 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.411) between groups. NAC patients experienced longer overall survival (OS) (median 32.7 vs. 22.0 months, p = 0.044) but similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median 13.8 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.456). After controlling for confounding factors, NAC was not independently associated with improved OS (OR 0.80) or RFS (OR 1.04). Among patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC for CR-PM, the use of NAC was associated with improved OS that did not persist on multivariable analysis. However, NAC prior to CRS+/-HIPEC was a safe and feasible strategy for CR-PM, which may aid in the appropriate selection of patients for aggressive cytoreductive surgery.

scholarly journals Two-step cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei with high peritoneal carcinomatosis index

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Trilling ◽  
Alexandre Brind’Amour ◽  
Raphael Hamad ◽  
Jean-Francois Tremblay ◽  
Pierre Dubé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Pseudomyxoma Peritonei ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index ◽  
Second Surgery ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background Complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the only curative treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) arising from the appendix. High peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to present the results of a planned two-step surgical strategy to decrease postoperative morbidity and improve resectability of patients with very high PCI. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent a planned two-step surgical approach for PMP between January 2012 and March 2020 were retrospectively included. This approach was offered for patients with low-grade PMP with PCI > 28 for which feasibility of a complete CRS in one operation was uncertain. The first surgery included a complete CRS of the inframesocolic compartment and omentectomy. HIPEC was delivered at the second surgery, after complete CRS of the supramesocolic compartment. Postoperative morbidity was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification and survival results were also collected. Results Eight patients underwent the two-step approach. The median PCI was 33 (29–39) and the median time between the two procedures was 111 days (90–212 days). One patient was deemed unresectable at the second surgery. The rate of major morbidity was 0% for the first step and 25% for the second step, with no mortality. Median follow-up was 53.8 months (3–73 months). Conclusion A two-step surgical management for low-grade PMP patients with very high PCI is safe and feasible, with acceptable postoperative morbidity and no compromise on oncological outcomes.

scholarly journals Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from Endometrial Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 679-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommaso Cornali ◽  
Paolo Sammartino ◽  
Nikolaos Kopanakis ◽  
Athina Christopoulou ◽  
Marialuisa Framarino dei Malatesta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases

scholarly journals Is Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Indicated in Hepatobiliary Malignancies?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Leigh ◽  
Daniel Solomon ◽  
Eric Pletcher ◽  
Daniel M. Labow ◽  
Deepa R. Magge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Current Therapies

Abstract Background: Hepatopancreaticobiliary malignancies with peritoneal carcinomatosis exhibit poor survival with current therapies; hepatocellular carcinoma 11 months with sorafenib, pancreaticobiliary 9-14 months with systemic chemotherapy. However, limited data exist on the utility of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in these patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional hepatopancreaticobiliary malignancies with peritoneal carcinomatosis which underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy from 2007-2017 and analyzed perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Results: 17 patients were included; 9 hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 pancreaticobiliary (4 cholangiocarcinoma, 3 gallbladder, 1 pancreatic). PCI, number of organs resected, completeness of cytoreduction and 30-day morbidity were equivalent. Hepatocellular carcinoma received significantly less neoadjuvant therapy (11%, p=0.008), though adjuvant therapy rates were similar. At a median follow-up of 15 months, progression-free survival was similar amongst all cohorts. However, overall survival was longer in hepatocellular carcinoma (42 months vs. cholangiocarcinoma 19 months, gallbladder 8 months, pancreatic 15 months, p=0.206) with 59% 3-year overall survival (vs. 0% cholangiogarcinoma, 0% gallbladder, 0% pancreatic).Conclusions: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may offer a survival benefit in select hepatocellular carcinoma patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, though has dubious utility in pancreaticobiliary malignancies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document