scholarly journals Prostatic abscess with infected aneurysms and spondylodiscitis after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a case report and literature review

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunichiro Nomura ◽  
Yuka Toyama ◽  
Jun Akatsuka ◽  
Yuki Endo ◽  
Ryoji Kimata ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is the conventional method of diagnosing prostate cancer. TRUS-guided prostate biopsy can occasionally be associated with severe complications. Here, we report the first case of a prostate abscess with aneurysms and spondylodiscitis as a complication of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, and we review the relevant literature. Case presentation A 78-year-old man presented with back pain, sepsis, and prostate abscesses. Twenty days after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, he was found to have a 20-mm diameter abdominal aortic aneurysm that expanded to 28.2 mm in the space of a week, despite antibiotic therapy. Therefore, he underwent transurethral resection of the prostate to control prostatic abscesses. Although his aneurysm decreased to 23 mm in size after surgery, he continued to experience back pain. He was diagnosed as having pyogenic spondylitis and this was managed using a lumbar corset. Sixty-four days after the prostate biopsy, the aneurysm had re-expanded to 30 mm; therefore, we performed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a microcore stent graft 82 days after the biopsy. Four days after the EVAR, the patient developed acute cholecystitis, and he underwent endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage. One hundred and sixty days after the prostate biopsy, all the complications had improved, and he was discharged. A literature review identified a further six cases of spondylodiscitis that had occurred after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Conclusions We have reported the first case of a complication of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy that involved prostatic abscesses, aneurysms, and spondylodiscitis. Although such complications are uncommon, clinicians should be aware of the potential for such severe complications of this procedure to develop.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayaz Virji ◽  
Lucio R. Minces ◽  
Zargham Abbass

Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS) has rarely been associated with disseminated infection, yet the occurrence appears to be increasing. Resistance to fluoroquinolones, the most commonly used prophylaxis, is one of the likely causes, withEscherichia colibeing the most commonly reported cause of these infections. Herein we present what is, to our knowledge, the first case ofEnterococcus faecalissepticemia and vertebral osteomyelitis after TRUS. Previously reported cases of this condition are referenced also.


Acute Pain ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
M.R.E. Buckley ◽  
N.J. Bryant ◽  
J.A. Brown ◽  
P. Tiwari ◽  
P.L. Cooperberg ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110251
Author(s):  
Umberto M Bracale ◽  
Anna Petrone ◽  
Michele Provenzano ◽  
Nicola Ielapi ◽  
Liborio Ferrante ◽  
...  

Objectives The Amplatzer Vascular Plug (AVP) is a vascular occlusion device designed to provide optimal embolization in several fields of the endovascular surgery. A full literature review was conducted to analyze AVPs in comparison with coils for the prevention of endoleaks during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods A systematic review was designed under PRISMA statement guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The results were updated with a subsequent electronic search using Medline and Scopus databases up to December 2019. Results Eighteen articles making this comparison were found. In 79.7% of the cases, the target vessel was the internal iliac artery; in 1.6%, the common iliac artery; and in 16.7%, the inferior mesenteric artery. Risk of complications (buttock claudication, groin hematoma, endoleaks, and erectile dysfunction) after AVP was low. A cost comparison revealed that the mean cost for coils was around US$2262, while the average cost for the AVP was US$310. Conclusions The AVP is an effective and safe device for occluding peripheral vessels, proved to have lower complications rates. Compared with coil embolization, the AVP technique is potentially associated with lower procedural costs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Chul Kam ◽  
See Min Choi ◽  
Sol Yoon ◽  
Jae Hui Choi ◽  
Seong Hyun Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document