scholarly journals ‘Don’t forget the mouth!’: a process evaluation of a public oral health project in community-dwelling frail older people

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bach Van Ho ◽  
Claar Debora van der Maarel-Wierink ◽  
Annemiek Rollman ◽  
Roxane Anthea Francesca Weijenberg ◽  
Frank Lobbezoo

Abstract Background Older people are encouraged to remain community dwelling, even when they become care-dependent. Not every dental practice is prepared or able to provide care to community-dwelling frail older people, while their ability to maintain oral health and to visit a dentist is decreasing, amongst others due to multiple chronic diseases and/or mobility problems. The public oral health project ‘Don’t forget the mouth! (DFTM!) aimed to improve the oral health of this population, by means of early recognition of decreased oral health as well as by establishing interprofessional care. A process evaluation was designed to scientifically evaluate the implementation of this project. Methods The project was implemented in 14 towns in The Netherlands. In each town, health care professionals from a general practice, a dental practice, and a homecare organization participated. The process evaluation framework focused on fidelity, dose, adaptation, and reach. Each of the items were examined on levels of implementation: macro-level, meso-level, and micro-level. Mixed methods (i.e., quantitative and qualitative methods) were used for data collection. Results The experiences of 50 health care professionals were evaluated with questionnaires, 22 semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the oral health of 407 community-dwelling frail older people was assessed. On each level of implementation, oral health care was integrated in the daily routine. On macro-level, education was planned (dose, adaption), and dental practices organized home visits (adaption). On meso-level, health care professionals attended meetings of the project (fidelity), worked interprofessionally, and used a screening-referral tool of the project DFTM! in daily practice (dose, adaption, reach). On micro-level, the frail older people participated in the screening of oral health (fidelity, dose), had their daily oral hygiene care observed (adaption) and supported if necessary, and some had themselves referred to a dental practice (reach). The semi-structured interviews also showed that the project increased the oral health awareness amongst health care professionals. Conclusions The project DFTM! was, in general, implemented and delivered as planned. Factors that contributed positively to the implementation were identified. With large-scale implementation, attention is needed regarding the poor accessibility of the oral health care professional, financial issues, and increased work pressure. Trial registration The Netherlands Trial Register NTR6159, registration done on December 13th 2016. URL: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6028

Gerodontology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieternella C. Bots-VantSpijker ◽  
Josef J.M. Bruers ◽  
Casper P. Bots ◽  
Jacques N.O. Vanobbergen ◽  
Luc M.J. De Visschere ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i21-i21
Author(s):  
K S Tipping

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this project was to explore what health outcomes matter to frail older people. This would provide information that would be of use to both providers and payers of health care services to align their priorities in line with these. Frailty is an important and relevant topic in healthcare. In England 5% of people aged 60-69 have frailty. This rises to 65% in people aged over 90. There are 1.8 million people aged over 60 and 0.8 million people aged over 80 living with frailty. (English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (2016)). This number is due to increase. The aims of this research were: To review the literature on health outcomes in older people including frail older people.To conduct a focus group interview with frail older people to ascertain their views on health outcomes.To disseminate and share the reviews and study findings via presentations and publications. Ethics Ethical approval was granted by the University of Liverpool’s Health and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee (application number 4163). Methods A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Thereafter a focus group interview was held with six frail older people. The participants were aged 65 years and over and had mild to moderate frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale. The interview recording was transcribed, and common themes identified and analysed. Results Eight themes were identified from the focus group: - Trust in medical professionalsVulnerability of being an older person in hospitalPolypharmacy and wastage of medicationDischarge Planning & Co-Ordination of Care at HomeTaking responsibility for your own healthNomenclatureAutonomyFalls Conclusion This study has identified themes that can be utilised to raise awareness among health care professionals on what matters to frail older people. The study findings will hopefully provide an opportunity for meaningful discussions around what is needed to better meet these desired health outcomes. References 1. Akpan A, Roberts C, Bandeen-Roche K, Batty B, Bausewein C, Bell D, et al. Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons. BMC Geriatr 2018;18(1):36. 2. Naik AD, Dindo LN, Van Liew JR, Hundt NE, Vo L, Hernandez-Bigos K, et al. Development of a Clinically Feasible Process for Identifying Individual Health Priorities. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2018;66(10):1872–9.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. R. van Duijnhoven ◽  
D. De Kam ◽  
W. Hellebrand ◽  
E. Smulders ◽  
A. C. H. Geurts ◽  
...  

Falls are a common complication after stroke, with balance and gait deficits being the most important risk factors. Taking into account the specific needs and capacities of people with stroke, we developed the FALLS program (FALL prevention after Stroke), based on the “Nijmegen falls prevention program” (a proven-effective 5-week exercise program designed for community-dwelling elderly people). The program was tested in twelve community-dwelling persons with stroke, and a process evaluation was conducted with patients, trainers, health care professionals, and managers. The FALLS program was considered suitable and feasible by people with stroke in the study and relevant health care professionals, and recommendations for implementation in clinical practice have been suggested.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaija Komulainen ◽  
Pekka Ylöstalo ◽  
Anna-Maija Syrjälä ◽  
Piia Ruoppi ◽  
Matti Knuuttila ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.R. Flint ◽  
D. Croser ◽  
D. Reznik ◽  
M. Glick ◽  
S. Naidoo ◽  
...  

This workshop addressed two important issues: first, the global evidence of HIV transmission from health care provider to patient and from patient to health care provider in the general health care environment and the dental practice setting; second, in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, whether oral health care professionals living with HIV pose a risk of transmission to their patients and whether standard infection control is adequate to protect both the patient and the oral health care professional in dental practice. The workshop culminated in a general discussion and the formulation of a consensus statement from the participating delegates, representing more than 30 countries, on the criteria under which an HIV-infected oral health care professional might practice dentistry without putting patients at risk. This consensus statement, the Beijing Declaration, was agreed nem con.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-164
Author(s):  
Yao‐Ming Cheng ◽  
Chang‐Chih Ping ◽  
Ching‐Sung Ho ◽  
Shou‐Jen Lan ◽  
Yen‐Ping Hsieh

Gerodontology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claar D. van der Maarel-Wierink ◽  
Jackie N.O. Vanobbergen ◽  
Ewald M. Bronkhorst ◽  
Jos M. G. A. Schols ◽  
Cees de Baat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document