scholarly journals Mapping the health systems response to violence against women: key learnings from five LMIC settings (2015–2020)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shegufta Shefa Sikder ◽  
Rakhi Ghoshal ◽  
Padma Bhate-Deosthali ◽  
Chandni Jaishwal ◽  
Nobhojit Roy
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Violence Against Women ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
System Response ◽  
Provider Attitudes ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
One Stop ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background Violence against women (VAW) is a global challenge, and the health sector is a key entry point for survivors to receive care. The World Health Organization adopted an earlier framework for health systems response to survivors. However, documentation on the programmatic rollout of health system response to violence against women is lacking in low and middle-income countries. This paper studies the programmatic roll out of the health systems response across select five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and identifies key learnings. Methods We selected five LMIC settings with recent or active programming on national-level health system response to VAW from 2015 to 2020. We synthesized publicly available data and program reports according to the components of the WHO Health Systems Framework. The countries selected are Bangladesh, Brazil, Nepal, Rwanda, and Sri Lanka. Results One-stop centers were found to be the dominant model of care located in hospitals in four countries. Each setting has implemented in-service training as key to addressing provider knowledge, attitudes and practice; however, significant gaps remain in addressing frequent staff turnover, provision of training at scale, and documentation of the impact of training. The health system protocols for VAW address sexual violence but do not uniformly include clinical and health policy responses for emotional or economic violence. Providing privacy to survivors within health facilities was a universal challenge. Conclusion Significant efforts have been made to address provider attitudes towards provision of care and to protocolize delivery of care to survivors, primarily through one-stop centers. Further improvements can be made in data collection on training impact on provider attitudes and practices, in provider identification of VAW survivors, and in prioritization of VAW within health system budgeting, staffing, and political priorities. Primary health facilities need to provide first-line support for survivors to avoid delays in response to all forms of VAW as well as for secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Mapping the health systems response to violence against women:

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shegufta Shefa Sikder ◽  
Rakhi Ghoshal ◽  
Padma Deosthali ◽  
Chandni Jaishwal ◽  
Nobhojit Roy
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Violence Against Women ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
System Response ◽  
Provider Attitudes ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
One Stop ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background: Violence against women (VAW) is prevalent globally, and the health sector is a key entry point for survivors to receive care. However, documentation on the rollout of health system response to violence against women is lacking in low and middle-income countries. This paper maps the operationalization of health systems response to violence against women in five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to identify core learnings. Methods: We selected five LMIC contexts that were actively addressing national-level health system response from 2015 to 2020 and where we had access to practitioners directly engaged in national rollout. We synthesized publicly available data and program reports according to the components of the Health Systems Framework to Address VAW. Results: One-stop centers were found to be the dominant model of care located in hospitals implemented by the health systems in four countries except Brazil, where one-stop centers are not located in hospitals and do not provide health services. While each setting has implemented in-service training as key to addressing provider knowledge, attitudes and practice, significant gaps remain in addressing frequent staff turnover, provision of training at scale, and documentation on the impact of training. Health system protocols for VAW address sexual violence but do not uniformly include clinical and health policy responses for other forms of violence. In Brazil, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, harmful practices such as virginity testing remain within clinical protocols. Providing privacy to survivors within health facilities was a universal challenge. Conclusions: Significant efforts have been made to address provider attitudes towards provision of care and in protocolized delivery of care to survivors, primarily through one-stop centers. Improvements can be made in data collection on training impact on provider attitudes and practices, in provider identification of VAW survivors, and in prioritization of VAW within health system budgeting, staffing, and political priorities. Beyond hospital-based one-stop centers at tertiary and district levels, primary health facilities need to provide first-line support for survivors to avoid delays in response to VAW as well as for secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Mapping the health systems response to violence against women: A comparative analysis of five LMIC settings (2015-2020)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shegufta Shefa Sikder ◽  
Rakhi Ghoshal ◽  
Padma Deosthali ◽  
Chandni Jaishwal ◽  
Nobhojit Roy
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Violence Against Women ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
System Response ◽  
Provider Attitudes ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
One Stop ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background Violence against women (VAW) is prevalent globally, and the health sector is a key entry point for survivors to receive care. However, documentation on the rollout of health system response to violence against women is lacking in low and middle-income countries. This paper maps the operationalization of health systems response to violence against women in five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to identify core learnings. Methods We selected five LMIC contexts that were actively addressing national-level health system response from 2015 to 2020 and where we had access to practitioners directly engaged in national rollout. We synthesized publicly available data and program reports according to the components of the Health Systems Framework to Address VAW. Results One-stop centers were found to be the dominant model of care located in hospitals implemented by the health systems in four countries except Brazil, where one-stop centers are not located in hospitals and do not provide health services. While each setting has implemented in-service training as key to addressing provider knowledge, attitudes and practice, significant gaps remain in addressing frequent staff turnover, provision of training at scale, and documentation on the impact of training. Health system protocols for VAW address sexual violence but do not uniformly include clinical and health policy responses for other forms of violence. In Brazil, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, harmful practices such as virginity testing remain within clinical protocols. Providing privacy to survivors within health facilities was a universal challenge. Conclusions Significant efforts have been made to address provider attitudes towards provision of care and in protocolized delivery of care to survivors, primarily through one-stop centers. Improvements can be made in data collection on training impact on provider attitudes and practices, in provider identification of VAW survivors, and in prioritization of VAW within health system budgeting, staffing, and political priorities. Beyond hospital-based one-stop centers at tertiary and district levels, primary health facilities need to provide first-line support for survivors to avoid delays in response to VAW as well as for secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Mental health system governance in Nigeria: challenges, opportunities and strategies for improvement

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Abdulmalik ◽  
L. Kola ◽  
O. Gureje
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Mental Health System ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Health System Governance ◽  
Low And Middle Income

IntroductionA health systems approach to understanding efforts for improving health care services is gaining traction globally. A component of this approach focuses on health system governance (HSG), which can make or mar the successful implementation of health care interventions. Very few studies have explored HSG in low- and middle-income countries, including Nigeria. Studies focusing on mental health system governance, are even more of a rarity. This study evaluates the mental HSG of Nigeria with a view to understanding the challenges, opportunities and strategies for strengthening it.MethodologyThis study was conducted as part of the project, Emerging Mental Health Systems in Low and Middle Income Countries (Emerald). A multi-method study design was utilized to evaluate the mental HSG status of Nigeria. A situational analysis of the health policy and legal environment in the country was performed. Subsequently, 30 key informant interviews were conducted at national, state and district levels to explore the country's mental HSG.ResultsThe existing policy, legislative and institutional framework for HSG in Nigeria reveals a complete exclusion of mental health in key health sector documents. The revised mental health policy is however promising. Using the Siddiqi framework categories, we identified pragmatic strategies for mental health system strengthening that include a consideration of existing challenges and opportunities within the system.ConclusionThe identified strategies provide a template for the subsequent activities of the Emerald Programme (and other interventions), towards strengthening the mental health system of Nigeria.

scholarly journals Strengthening mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations from the Emerald programme

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Semrau ◽  
Atalay Alem ◽  
Jose L. Ayuso-Mateos ◽  
Dan Chisholm ◽  
Oye Gureje ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Human Resource Development ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Mental Health Systems ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

BackgroundThere is a large treatment gap for mental, neurological or substance use (MNS) disorders. The ‘Emerging mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)’ (Emerald) research programme attempted to identify strategies to work towards reducing this gap through the strengthening of mental health systems.AimsTo provide a set of proposed recommendations for mental health system strengthening in LMICs.MethodThe Emerald programme was implemented in six LMICs in Africa and Asia (Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda) over a 5-year period (2012–2017), and aimed to improve mental health outcomes in the six countries by building capacity and generating evidence to enhance health system strengthening.ResultsThe proposed recommendations align closely with the World Health Organization's key health system strengthening ‘building blocks’ of governance, financing, human resource development, service provision and information systems; knowledge transfer is included as an additional cross-cutting component. Specific recommendations are made in the paper for each of these building blocks based on the body of data that were collected and analysed during Emerald.ConclusionsThese recommendations are relevant not only to the six countries in which their evidential basis was generated, but to other LMICs as well; they may also be generalisable to other non-communicable diseases beyond MNS disorders.Declaration of interestNone.

scholarly journals Enhancing the Understanding of Resilience in Health Systems of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Yongeun Grimm ◽  
Sandy Oliver ◽  
Sonja Merten ◽  
Wai Wai Han ◽  
Kaspar Wyss
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Dynamic Attributes ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background: A country’s health system faces pressure when hit by an unexpected shock, such as what we observe in the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The concept of resilience is highly relevant in this context and is a prerequisite for a health system capable of withstanding future shocks. By exploring how the key dimensions of the resilient health system framework are applied, the present systematic review synthesizes the vital features of resilient health systems in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this review is to ascertain the relevance of health system resilience in the context of a major shock, through better understanding its dimensions, uses and implications. Methods: The review uses the best-fit framework synthesis approach. An a priori conceptual framework was selected and a coding framework created. A systematic search identified 4284 unique citations from electronic databases and reports by non-governmental organisations, 12 of which met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and coded against the pre-existing themes. Themes outside of the a priori framework were collated to form a refined list of themes. Then, all twelve studies were revisited using the new list of themes in the context of each study. Results: Ten themes were generated from the analysis. Five confirmed the a priori conceptual framework that capture the dynamic attributes of a resilient system. Five new themes were identified as foundational for achieving resilience: realigned relationships, foresight and motivation as drivers, and emergency preparedness and change management as organisational mechanisms. Conclusion: The refined conceptual model shows how the themes inter-connect. The foundations of resilience appear to be critical especially in resource-constrained settings to unlock the dynamic attributes of resilience. This review prompts countries to consider building the foundations of resilience described here as a priority to better prepare for future shocks.

scholarly journals Effective methods for knowledge transfer to strengthen mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose L. Ayuso-Mateos ◽  
Maria Miret ◽  
Pilar Lopez-Garcia ◽  
Atalay Alem ◽  
Dan Chisholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Mental Health Systems ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background The Emerald project's focus is on how to strengthen mental health systems in six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda). This was done by generating evidence and capacity to enhance health system performance in delivering mental healthcare. A common problem in scaling-up interventions and strengthening mental health programmes in LMICs is how to transfer research evidence, such as the data collected in the Emerald project, into practice. Aims To describe how core elements of Emerald were implemented and aligned with the ultimate goal of strengthening mental health systems, as well as their short-term impact on practices, policies and programmes in the six partner countries. Method We focused on the involvement of policy planners, managers, patients and carers. Results Over 5 years of collaboration, the Emerald consortium has provided evidence and tools for the improvement of mental healthcare in the six LMICs involved in the project. We found that the knowledge transfer efforts had an impact on mental health service delivery and policy planning at the sites and countries involved in the project. Conclusions This approach may be valid beyond the mental health context, and may be effective for any initiative that aims at implementing evidence-based health policies for health system strengthening.

scholarly journals Decentralization and Regionalization: Redesigning Health Systems for High Quality Maternity Care Comment on "Decentralization and Regionalization of Surgical Care: A Review of Evidence for the Optimal Distribution of Surgical Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanam Roder-DeWan
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Maternity Care ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Maternal Complications ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

The question of how to optimally design health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for high quality care and survival requires context-specific evidence on which level of the health system is best positioned to deliver services. Given documented poor quality of care for surgical conditions in LMICs, evidence to support intentional health system design is urgently needed. Iverson and colleagues address this very important question. This commentary explores their findings with particular attention to how they apply to maternity care. Though surgical maternity care is a common healthcare need, maternal complications are often unpredictable and require immediate surgical attention in order to avert serious morbidity or mortality. A discussion of decentralization for maternity services must grapple with this tension and differentiate between facilities that can provide emergency surgical care and those that can not.

scholarly journals The Health Systems of Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Public Health ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Mills
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Political Science ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

“Health system” is a term generally considered to be relatively recent. It is defined as all organizations, institutions, and resources that produce actions whose primary purpose is to improve health, whether these be targeted at individuals (such as health-care delivery) or populations (such as public health measures). Health-care and public health institutions have a long history, but the notion of an organized “health system” is a relatively recent development (dating from the mid-20th century). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), Western medicine was often introduced by former colonial authorities through the construction of public hospitals, health centers, and training schools, with church authorities also making a major contribution. As in high-income countries, there was a gradual process over the latter half 20th century to construct an organized and coordinated national health system. However, health systems became a key focus of international attention only in the late 1990s, when it became apparent that achieving the health-related Millennium Development Goals (e.g., reduction of child and maternal mortality; control of HIV, TB, and malaria) was threatened less by the availability of technical solutions and more by the ability of health systems to put them into practice. More recently, the Ebola epidemic in West Africa highlighted the critical importance of health systems in ensuring health security. In response to the increased awareness of the role of health systems, significant attention has been paid to defining the health system and its goals, categorizing its elements, assessing problems and testing solutions, and seeking to identify the relationship between different health system configurations and overall performance. Over time, specific issues within the general area of health systems have received special attention, including achieving universal health coverage (where the whole population of a country has access to health care and protection against its costs), the role of primary health care, the relative merits of different ways of financing a health system, the relative roles of public and private health sectors, and the appropriate mix of different types of health worker. Many disciplines can contribute to improved understanding of health systems, including economics, sociology, anthropology, history, political science, and management science. Until recently, the discipline of economics has tended to dominate the study of health systems. However, with the emergence of health policy and systems research as an important area of study, other disciplines have been making growing contributions, especially political science and the behavioral sciences concerned with the behavior of both individuals and organizations.

scholarly journals Health system strengthening for mental health in low- and middle-income countries: introduction to the Emerald programme

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Thornicroft ◽  
Maya Semrau
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Mental Health Systems ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Summary This paper gives an overview of the Emerald (Emerging mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries) programme and introduces the subsequent seven papers in this BJPsych Open thematic series. The aims of the Emerald research programme were to improve mental health outcomes in six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), namely Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda, by building capacity and by generating evidence to enhance health system strengthening in these six countries. The longer-term aim is to improve mental healthcare, and so contribute to a reduction in the large treatment gap that exists for mental disorders. This series includes papers describing the following components of the Emerald programme: (a) capacity building; (b) mental health financing; (c) integrated care (d) mental health information systems; and (e) knowledge transfer. We also include a cross-cutting paper with recommendations from the Emerald programme as a whole. The inclusion of clear mental-health-related targets and indicators within the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals now intensifies the need for strong evidence about both how to provide effective treatments, and how to deliver these treatments within robust health systems.

scholarly journals The impacts of health systems financing fragmentation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Siqueira ◽  
Maíra Coube ◽  
Christopher Millett ◽  
Rudi Rocha ◽  
Thomas Hone
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Financial Risk Protection ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background Health systems are often fragmented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This can increase inefficiencies and restrict progress towards universal health coverage. The objective of the systematic review described in this protocol will be to evaluate and synthesize the evidence concerning the impacts of health systems financing fragmentation in LMICs. Methods Literature searches will be conducted in multiple electronic databases, from their inception onwards, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Scielo, Cochrane Library, EconLit, and JSTOR. Gray literature will be also targeted through searching OpenSIGLE, Google Scholar, and institutional websites (e.g., HMIC, The World Bank, WHO, PAHO, OECD). The search strings will include keywords related to LMICs, health system financing fragmentation, and health system goals. Experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies conducted in LMICs and examining health financing fragmentation across any relevant metric (e.g., the presence of different health funders/insurers, risk pooling mechanisms, eligibility categories, benefits packages, premiums) will be included. Studies will be eligible if they compare financing fragmentation in alternative settings or at least two-time points. The primary outcomes will be health system-related goals such as health outcomes (e.g., mortality, morbidity, patient-reported outcome measures) and indicators of access, services utilization, equity, and financial risk protection. Additional outcomes will include intermediate health system objectives (e.g., indicators of efficiency and quality). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstract data, and full-text articles. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion and, when necessary, resolved by a third reviewer. The methodological quality (or risk of bias) of selected studies will be appraised using established checklists. Data extraction categories will include the studies’ objective and design, the fragmentation measurement and domains, and health outcomes linked to the fragmentation. A narrative synthesis will be used to describe the results and characteristics of all included studies and to explore relationships and findings both within and between the studies. Discussion Evidence on the impacts of health system fragmentation in LMICs is key for identifying evidence gaps and priority areas for intervention. This knowledge will be valuable to health system policymakers aiming to strengthen health systems in LMICs. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020201467

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document