scholarly journals Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis S. Nelson ◽  
Scott R. Davis ◽  
Robert M. Humble ◽  
Jeff Kulhavy ◽  
Dean R. Aman ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 1424-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha E. Laposata ◽  
Michael Laposata ◽  
Elizabeth M. Van Cott ◽  
Dion S. Buchner ◽  
Mohammed S. Kashalo ◽  
...  

Abstract Context.—Complex coagulation test panels ordered by clinicians are typically reported to clinicians without a patient-specific interpretive paragraph. Objectives.—To survey clinicians regarding pathologist-generated interpretations of complex laboratory testing panels and to assess the ability of the interpretations to educate test orderers. Design.—Surveys were conducted of physicians ordering complex coagulation laboratory testing that included narrative interpretation. Evaluation of order requisitions was performed to assess the interpretation's influence on ordering practices. Setting.—Physicians ordering coagulation testing at a large academic medical center hospital in Boston, Mass, and physicians from outside hospitals using the academic medical center as a reference laboratory for coagulation testing. Outcome Measures.—Physician surveys and evaluation of laboratory requisition slips. Results.—In nearly 80% of responses, the ordering clinicians perceived that the interpretive comments saved them time and improved the diagnostic process. Moreover, the interpretations were perceived by ordering clinicians to help prevent a misdiagnosis or otherwise impact the differential diagnosis in approximately 70% of responses. In addition, interpretations appeared to be able to train the ordering clinicians as to the standard ordering practices. Conclusions.—The results demonstrate physician satisfaction with an innovative information delivery approach that provides laboratory diagnostic interpretation and test-ordering education to clinicians in the context of their daily workflow.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte V. Hobbs ◽  
Jan Drobeniuc ◽  
Theresa Kittle ◽  
John Williams ◽  
Paul Byers ◽  
...  

AbstractCase-based tracking of COVID-19 in children and adolescents may underestimate infection, and compared with adults there is little pediatric SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence data. To assess evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infections among children and adolescents in Mississippi, serologic testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was conducted on a convenience sample of residual serum specimens collected for routine laboratory testing by an academic medical center laboratory during May 17 through September 19, 2020. Seroprevalence by calendar month was standardized to the state population by race/ethnicity; cumulative numbers of infections were estimated by extrapolating seroprevalence to all those aged <18 years in Mississippi. Serum specimens from 1,603 individuals were tested; 175 (10.9%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Among 1,579 (98.5%) individuals for whom race/ethnicity was known, the number testing positive was 16 (23.2%) of 69 Hispanic individuals, 117 (13.0%) of 901 non-Hispanic Black individuals and 30 (5.3%) of 565 non-Hispanic White individuals. Population-weighted seroprevalence estimates among those aged <18 years increased from 2.6% in May to 16.9% in September 2020. Cumulative numbers of infections extrapolated from seroprevalence data, however, were estimated at 117,805 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68,771–168,708), suggesting that cases in children and adolescents are much higher than what was reported to the Mississippi State Department of Health (9,044 cases during this period). Further data to appreciate the burden of pediatric disease to inform public health policy is urgently needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 1125-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J Szymanski ◽  
Abraham J Qavi ◽  
Kari Laux ◽  
Ronald Jackups

Abstract BACKGROUND Clinical decision support alerts for laboratory testing have poor compliance. Once-per-visit alerts, triggered by reorder of a test within the same admission, are highly specific for unnecessary orders and provide a means to study alert compliance. METHODS Once-per-visit alerts for 18 laboratory orderables were analyzed over a 60-month period from September 2012 to October 2016 at a 1200-bed academic medical center. To determine correlates of alert compliance, we compared alerts by test and provider characteristics. RESULTS Overall alert compliance was 54.5%. In multivariate regression, compliance correlated with length of stay at time of alert, provider type, previous alerts in a patient visit, test ordered, total alerts experienced by ordering provider, and previous order status. CONCLUSIONS A diverse set of provider and test characteristics influences compliance with once-per-visit laboratory alerts. Future alerts should incorporate these characteristics into alert design to minimize alert overrides.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P Lee ◽  
Michael Tansey ◽  
Jennifer G Jetton ◽  
Matthew D Krasowski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document