scholarly journals Staff ratings of occupational engagement among people with severe mental illness – psychometric properties of a screening tool in the day center context

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Eklund ◽  
Ulrika Bejerholm
2015 ◽  
Vol 169 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 292-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Girard ◽  
Aurelie Tinland ◽  
El had Mohamed ◽  
Laurent Boyer ◽  
Pascal Auquier

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 334-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Birmingham ◽  
Mark Mullee

Aims and MethodTo develop and evaluate a screening tool based on the observational skills of prison officers to identify adult male prisoners with severe mental illness. The tool was developed from open-ended interviews with officers and diagnostic interviews with prisoners. A case–comparison study was used to evaluate the tool. Fifty prisoners identified using the tool and 50 randomly selected prisoners underwent diagnostic interviews to determine the proportion in each group with severe mental illness.ResultsFive behavioural indicators of severe mental illness were identified and incorporated into the tool. In the evaluation, 19 out of 50 (38%) of the cases identified were found to have severe mental illness compared with none in the comparison group.Clinical ImplicationsThe simple tool shows promise for the identification of prisoners with severe mental illness by prison officers. It does require further evaluation in other prison settings.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Puschner ◽  
Suzanne Cosh ◽  
Thomas Becker

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and psychometric properties of the German version of the Outcome Questionnaire (Ergebnisfragebogen; EB-45) in people with severe mental illness (N = 294). Reliability and sensitivity to change were assessed. Convergent validity was examined through correlations with the measures Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS-D) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and predictive validity through correlation with length of inpatient stay. The EB-45 showed good reliability and sensitivity to change, as well as good internal consistency for the total score and the subscale “symptom distress.” The EB-45 was found to be acceptable and feasible for use within inpatient psychiatric settings. Also predictive validity was good. However, psychometric properties of the subscales “interpersonal relations” and “social role” were equivocal. Thus, interpreting subscale scores only is not advisable. Also low convergent validity is a concern. Taken together, the EB-45 can be recommended for outcome assessment in a wide range of mental health service settings including inpatient psychiatric services. However, treatment planning and evaluation of effectiveness of services for people with severe mental illness should not be based on EB-45 data alone.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Larivière ◽  
Ginette Aubin ◽  
Marie-Ève Pépin ◽  
Vanessa Maurice ◽  
François Lavertu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-357
Author(s):  
Nadine Larivière ◽  
Ginette Aubin ◽  
Marie-Ève Pépin ◽  
Vanessa Maurice ◽  
François Lavertu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document