scholarly journals Effect and limitation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: consideration from a new perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Kurata ◽  
Takayuki Shiraki ◽  
Masanori Ichinose ◽  
Keiichi Kubota ◽  
Yasuo Imai
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Nodal Metastasis ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Resected Specimen ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Postoperative Prognosis ◽  
Pathologic Stage

Abstract Background Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has remained under investigation. We investigated its effect from a unique perspective and discussed its application. Patients and methods We retrospecively analyzed consecutive 131 PDAC patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Clinicopathologic data at surgery and postoperative prognosis were compared between patients who underwent upfront surgery (UFS) (n = 64) and those who received NAC (n = 67), of which 62 (92.5%) received gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS). The GS regimen resulted in about 15% of partial response and 85% of stable disease in a previous study which analyzed a subset of this study subjects. Results Tumor size was marginally smaller, degree of nodal metastasis and rate of distant metastasis were significantly lower, and pathologic stage was significantly lower in the NAC group than in the UFS group. In contrast, significant differences were not observed in histopathologic features such as vessel and perineural invasions and differentiation grade. Notably, disease-free and overall survivals were similar between the two groups adjusted for the pathologic stage, suggesting that effects of NAC, including macroscopically undetectable ones such as control of micro-metastasis and devitalizing tumor cells, may not be remarkable in the majority of PDAC, at least with respect to the GS regimen. Conclusions NAC may be useful in downstaging and improving prognosis in a small subset of tumors. However, postoperative prognosis may be determined at the pathologic stage of resected specimen with or without NAC. Therefore, NAC may be applicable to borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC for enabling surgical resection, but UFS would be desirable for primary resectable PDAC.

Predicting Surgical Margins in Patients With Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Resection

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110111
Author(s):  
Weizheng Ren ◽  
Dimitrios Xourafas ◽  
Stanley W. Ashley ◽  
Thomas E. Clancy
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Stepwise Selection ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
Positive Resection Margins

Background Many patients with borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (borderline resectable [BR]/locally advanced [LA] pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) undergoing resection will have positive resection margins (R1), which is associated with poor prognosis. It might be useful to preoperatively predict the margin (R) status. Methods Data from patients with BR/LA PDAC who underwent a pancreatectomy between 2008 and 2018 at Brigham and Women’s Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between R status and relevant preoperative factors. Significant predictors of R1 resection on univariate analysis ( P < .1) were entered into a stepwise selection using the Akaike information criterion to define the final model. Results A total of 142 patients with BR/LA PDAC were included in the analysis, 60(42.3%) had R1 resections. In stepwise selection, the following factors were identified as positive predictors of an R1 resection: evidence of lymphadenopathy at diagnosis (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 0.99-4.36, P = .056), the need for pancreaticoduodenectomy (OR = 3.81, 96% CI: 1.15-15.70, P = .040), extent of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein involvement at restaging (<180°, OR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.00-17.00, P = .069, ≥180°, OR = 7,32, 95% CI: 1.75-39.87, P = .010), stable CA 19-9 serum levels (less than 50% decrease from diagnosis to restaging, OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 0.84-6.36 P = .107), and no preoperative FOLFIRINOX (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 0.86-5.64, P = .103). The prognostic nomogram based on this model yielded a probability of achieving an R1 resection ranging from <5% (0 factors) to >70% (all 5 factors). Conclusions Relevant preoperative clinicopathological characteristics accurately predict positive resection margins in patients with BR/LA PDAC before resection. With further development, this model might be used to preoperatively guide surgical decision-making in patients with BR/LA PDAC.

Surgical outcomes and rate of pathological response in resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX: A retrospective institutional analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16247-e16247
Author(s):  
Abraham Attah Attah ◽  
Saleha Rizwan ◽  
Khaled Alhamad ◽  
Micheal Turk ◽  
Palash Asawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Significant Difference

e16247 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal solid tumors, predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer related death in some regions of the world. It often presents at an advanced stage, which contributes to poor five-year survival rates of 2%-9%, ranking firmly last amongst all cancer sites in terms of prognostic outcomes for patients. Only about 20% of the cases are diagnosed early enough to undergo surgical resection leading to complete remission. While chemotherapy has an established role in the setting of metastatic disease, utilizing it in the neo-adjuvant setting has been adopted by most institutes for resectable/ borderline resectable cases. Ongoing trials are exploring the use of different regimens in the neo-adjuvant setting. The aim of our study was to identify patients with resectable/borderline resectable PDAC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and differences in surgical outcome based on the regimen received i.e gemcitabine/ nab-Paclitaxel vs FOLFIRINOX. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients diagnosed with PDAC from 2017-2019 at Allegheny General Hospital. Data analysis was completed using IBM SPSS v23. Summary statistics were presented using percentages for categorical variables and medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables. Results: Out of 121 patients who received and completed treatment in our institution, 30 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment followed by surgical intervention. 21 (70%) patients were found to be borderline resectable, 8 (27%) patients were resectable and 1 patient had locally advanced PDAC. 16 (53%) patients received FOLFIRINOX compared to 13 (43%) patients received gem/nab-paclitaxel. Among patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, 5 out of 16 (31%) patients had moderate to significant treatment response at the time of surgery compared to 7 out of 13 (54%) patients who received gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Conclusions: Our study revealed no significant difference (p=0.21) between the patients who received neoadjuvant gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel vs FOLFIRINOX in terms of treatment response assessed pathologically at the time surgical resection. We recognize the limitations of our study in terms of it being a retrospective analysis with a small sample size and therefore further prospective and randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most suitable and effective regimen in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable/borderline resectable PDAC patients. Response to treatment among different chemotherapy groups.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document