scholarly journals Implementing a successful proactive telephone breastfeeding peer support intervention: volunteer recruitment, training, and intervention delivery in the RUBY randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. Grimes ◽  
Helen L. McLachlan ◽  
Della A. Forster ◽  
Fiona McLardie-Hore ◽  
Kate Mortensen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The RUBY randomised controlled trial demonstrated the benefit of proactive telephone peer support in promoting breastfeeding continuation in a setting with high breastfeeding initiation, where typically this is difficult to achieve. This paper describes the implementation and delivery of the peer support intervention with a focus on recruitment, training, and support of peer volunteers, and includes a description of the key components of the calls. Methods Data collection occurred between December 2012 and June 2016 in Melbourne, Australia. Volunteers completed enrolment forms at the training session and recorded data related to each call in a Call Log maintained for each mother supported. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics and responses to open-ended questions analysed using content analysis. Results A total of 693 women expressed interest in the peer support role, with 246 completing training, that is, 95% of whom supported at least one mother. Each supported a mean of two mothers (range 1 to 11). Training session topics included respecting individual values, using positive language, confidence building, active listening, empathetic support, and normal baby behaviour. There were 518 periods of support where at least one call was made between a volunteer and a mother to whom she was allocated. Of the 518 periods of support, 359 Call Logs (69%) were returned. The 359 call logs recorded a total of 2398 calls between peers and mothers. Call length median duration was 12 min (range 1 to 111 min). Volunteers perceived the most valued aspects of the calls were the provsion of ‘general emotional support’ (51%) and ‘general information/discussion about breastfeeding’ (44%). During the first call, mothers raised questions about ‘nipple pain/ damage’ (24%) and 'general breastfeeding information’ (23%). At ≥12 weeks postpartum, issues raised related to ‘normal infant behaviour’ (22%), ‘feed frequency’ (16%), and ‘general breastfeeding information’ (15%). Volunteers referred women to other resources during 28% of calls, most commonly to the Australian Breastfeeding Association. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that the RUBY trial was feasible and sustainable in terms of recruiting volunteers who were willing to participate in training and who proceeded to provide peer support. Call content was responsive to the evolving breastfeeding information needs of mothers and the provision of emotional support was perceived by volunteers to be important. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN 12612001024831.

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 3005-3015
Author(s):  
HA Grimes ◽  
T Shafiei ◽  
HL McLachlan ◽  
DA Forster

AbstractObjective:The Ringing Up About Breastfeeding earlY (RUBY) randomised controlled trial (RCT) found that a telephone-based peer volunteer support intervention increased breast-feeding duration in a setting with high breast-feeding initiation. This sub-study of the RUBY RCT describes the motivation, preparation and experiences of volunteers who provided the peer support intervention.Design:An online survey was completed by 154 (67 %) volunteers after ceasing volunteering.Setting:Volunteers provided peer support to primiparous women (n 574) who birthed at one of three public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, between February 2013 and December 2015.Participants:Volunteers (n 230) had themselves breastfed for at least 6 months and received 4 h of training for the role.Results:The median number of mothers supported was two (range 1–11), and two-thirds of respondents supported at least one mother for 6 months. Volunteers were motivated by a strong desire to support new mothers to establish and continue breast-feeding. Most (93 %) considered the training session adequate. The majority (60 %) reported following the call schedule ‘most of the time’, but many commented that ‘it depends on the mother’. Overall, 84 % of volunteers were satisfied with the role and reported that the experience was enjoyable (85 %) and worthwhile (90 %). Volunteers agreed that telephone support for breast-feeding was valued by women (88 %) and that the programme would be effective in helping women to breastfeed (93 %).Conclusions:These findings are important for those developing similar peer support programmes in which recruiting volunteers and developing training requirements are an integral and recurrent part of volunteer management.


BMC Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen R. Stagg ◽  
Julian Surey ◽  
Marie Francis ◽  
Jennifer MacLellan ◽  
Graham R. Foster ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Johansson ◽  
Sophie Keller ◽  
Henrike Winkler ◽  
Thomas Ostermann ◽  
Raimund Weitgasser ◽  
...  

Aim. Testing the effectiveness of peer support additionally to a disease management programme (DMP) for type 2 diabetes patients.Methods. Unblinded cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 49 general practices, province of Salzburg, Austria. All patients enrolled in the DMP were eligible,n=337participated (intervention: 148 in 19 clusters; control: 189 in 20 clusters). The peer support intervention ran over 24 months and consisted of peer supporter recruitment and training, and group meetings weekly for physical exercise and monthly for discussion of diabetes related topics.Results. At two-year follow-up, adjusted analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference inHbA1cchange of 0.14% (21.97 mmol/mol) in favour of the intervention (95% CI −0.08 to 0.36%,p=0.22). Baseline values were 7.02 ± 1.25% in the intervention and 7.08 ± 1.25 in the control group. None of the secondary outcome measures showed significant differences except for improved quality of life (EQ-5D-VAS) in controls (4.3 points on a scale of 100; 95% CI 0.08 to 8.53,p=0.046) compared to the intervention group.Conclusion. Our peer support intervention as an additional DMP component showed no significant effect onHbA1cand secondary outcome measures. Further RTCs with a longer follow-up are needed to reveal whether peer support will have clinically relevant effects.Trial Registration. This trial has been registered with Current Controlled Trials Ltd. (ISRCTN10291077).


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. Martin ◽  
John Reece ◽  
Sue Lauder ◽  
Andrew McClelland

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e63271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sietske J. Tamminga ◽  
Jos H. A. M. Verbeek ◽  
Monique M. E. M. Bos ◽  
Guus Fons ◽  
Jos J. E. M. Kitzen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document