scholarly journals Definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with squamous cell cancers of the head and neck - results from an unselected cohort of the clinical cooperation group “Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer”

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Schüttrumpf ◽  
Sebastian Marschner ◽  
Katrin Scheu ◽  
Julia Hess ◽  
Sibylle Rietzler ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. There is a clinical need for a stratification of this prognostically heterogeneous group of tumors in order to optimize treatment of individual patients. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx, treated with dCRT from 09/2008 until 03/2016 at the Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich. Here we report the clinical results of the cohort which represent the basis for biomarker discovery and molecular genetic research within the framework of a clinical cooperation group. Methods Patient data were collected and analyzed for outcome and treatment failures with regard to previously described and established risk factors. Results We identified 184 patients with a median follow-up of 65 months and a median age of 64 years. Patients received dCRT with a median dose of 70 Gy and simultaneous chemotherapy in 90.2% of cases, mostly mitomycin C / 5-FU in concordance with the ARO 95–06 trial. The actuarial 3-year overall survival (OS), local, locoregional and distant failure rates were 42.7, 29.8, 34.0 and 23.4%, respectively. Human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx cancer (HPVOPC) and smaller gross tumor volume were associated with significantly improved locoregional tumor control rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and OS in multivariate analysis. Additionally, lower hemoglobin levels were significantly associated with impaired DFS und OS in univariate analysis. The extent of lymph node involvement was associated with distant failure, DFS and OS. Moreover, 92 patients (50%) of our cohort have been treated in concordance with the ARO 95–06 study, corroborating the results of this study. Conclusion Our cohort is a large unselected monocentric cohort of HNSCC patients treated with dCRT. Tumor control rates and survival rates compare favorably with the results of previously published reports. The clinical data, together with the available tumor samples from biopsies, will allow translational research based on molecular genetic analyses.

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enis Tinjak ◽  
Velda Smajlbegović ◽  
Adnan Beganović ◽  
Mirjana Ristanić ◽  
Halil Ćorović ◽  
...  

Introduction: Radiation therapy has long played an integral role in the manage¬ment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), both for organ preservation and to improve tumor control in the postoperative setting. The aim of this research is to investigate the effects of adaptive radiotherapy on dosimetric, clinical, and toxicity outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy treatment. Many sources have reported volume reductions in the primary target, nodal volumes, and parotid glands over treatment, which may result in unintended dosimetric changes affecting the side effect profile and even efficacy of the treatment. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is an interesting treatment paradigm that has been developed to directly adjust to these changes.Material and methods: This research contains the results of 15 studies, including clinical trials, randomized prospective and retrospective studies. The researches analyze the impact of radiation therapy on changes in tumor volume and the relationship with planned radiation dose delivery, as well as the possibility of using adaptive radiotherapy in response to identified changes. Also, medical articles and abstracts that are closely related to the title of adaptive radiotherapy were researched.Results: The application of ART significantly improved the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer, as well as two-year locoregional control of the disease. The average time to apply ART is the middle of the treatment course approximately 17 to 20 fractions of the treatment.Conclusion: Based on systematic review of the literature, evidence based changes in target volumes and dose reduction at OAR, adaptive radiotherapy is recommended treatment for most of the patients with head and neck cancer with the support of image-guided radiotherapy.


Head & Neck ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 791-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. McHam ◽  
David J. Adelstein ◽  
Lisa A. Rybicki ◽  
Pierre Lavertu ◽  
Ramon M. Esclamado ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6073-6073 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jamshed ◽  
R. Hussain ◽  
S. Ahmed ◽  
K. Rehman ◽  
K. Shehzad ◽  
...  

6073 Background: Cisplatin/infusional 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy is routinely administered as standard induction chemotherapy in advanced HANC. However, the optimum treatment remains to be defined. Gemcitabine is an active agent in HANC and few studies have evaluated induction GC in HANC. We have explored the activity and toxicity of GC as induction treatment in HANC and report the results. Methods: From August 2005 to September 2006, 55 patients with locally advanced HANC had induction chemotherapy with GC at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre. We reviewed the medical records and prospectively collected data to determine activity and toxicity of induction GC. M:F ratio was 64%:36% with a median age of 50 years (range 19–80). All patients had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. The site of disease was nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses, oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hyopharynx in 4% (2), 11% (6), 51% (21), 2% (1), 11% (6) and 22% (11) respectively. According to AJCC staging 7% (4) had stage III and 93% (51) had stage IVa/IVb disease (T3N0 7%, T3N+ 2%, T4N0 38% and T4N+ 53%). Induction chemotherapy consisted of 2 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 with treatment repeated three weekly. Fifty-three (94%) patients received 2 cycles as planned. Toxicity was scored after each cycle according to the NCI.CTC criteria. Response was assessed following completion of induction chemotherapy by clinical examination/MRI scan. Results: All patients were available for assessment of toxicity and response. A total of 111 cycles were delivered. The response rates are: complete 24% (13), partial 62% (34), no response 7% (4) and progression 7% (4). The overall response rate was 86% (complete 24%, partial 62%). No treatment related deaths occurred. Haematological G3/G4 toxicity included neutropenia (13%/7%) and thrombocytopenia (5%/0%). The non-haematological toxicity observed (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) was only G1/G2. Conclusions: GC is well tolerated with low toxicity and high anti tumour activity as neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment in squamous cell head and neck cancer. Combination GC arm should be included in future trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document