scholarly journals Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with post traumatic brain injury using National Trauma Registry and Machine Learning Approach

Author(s):  
Ahmad Abujaber ◽  
Adam Fadlalla ◽  
Diala Gammoh ◽  
Husham Abdelrahman ◽  
Monira Mollazehi ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Shara I. Feld ◽  
Daniel S. Hippe ◽  
Ljubomir Miljacic ◽  
Nayak L. Polissar ◽  
Shu-Fang Newman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. emermed-2020-210776
Author(s):  
Carl Marincowitz ◽  
Lewis Paton ◽  
Fiona Lecky ◽  
Paul Tiffin

BackgroundPatients with mild traumatic brain injury on CT scan are routinely admitted for inpatient observation. Only a small proportion of patients require clinical intervention. We recently developed a decision rule using traditional statistical techniques that found neurologically intact patients with isolated simple skull fractures or single bleeds <5 mm with no preinjury antiplatelet or anticoagulant use may be safely discharged from the emergency department. The decision rule achieved a sensitivity of 99.5% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.9%) and specificity of 7.4% (95% CI 6.0% to 9.1%) to clinical deterioration. We aimed to transparently report a machine learning approach to assess if predictive accuracy could be improved.MethodsWe used data from the same retrospective cohort of 1699 initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13–15 patients with injuries identified by CT who presented to three English Major Trauma Centres between 2010 and 2017 as in our original study. We assessed the ability of machine learning to predict the same composite outcome measure of deterioration (indicating need for hospital admission). Predictive models were built using gradient boosted decision trees which consisted of an ensemble of decision trees to optimise model performance.ResultsThe final algorithm reported a mean positive predictive value of 29%, mean negative predictive value of 94%, mean area under the curve (C-statistic) of 0.75, mean sensitivity of 99% and mean specificity of 7%. As with logistic regression, GCS, severity and number of brain injuries were found to be important predictors of deterioration.ConclusionWe found no clear advantages over the traditional prediction methods, although the models were, effectively, developed using a smaller data set, due to the need to divide it into training, calibration and validation sets. Future research should focus on developing models that provide clear advantages over existing classical techniques in predicting outcomes in this population.


Brain Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abebe Tiruneh ◽  
Maya Siman-Tov ◽  
Adi Givon ◽  
Israel Trauma Group ◽  
Kobi Peleg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document