scholarly journals International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Cecile Tissot ◽  
María V. Fraga ◽  
Nadya Yousef ◽  
Rafael Gonzalez Cortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
European Society ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
International Evidence ◽  
Critically Ill Neonates ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Establishing a Risk Assessment Framework for Point-of-Care Ultrasound

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Conlon ◽  
Nadya Yousef ◽  
Juan Mayordomo Colungo ◽  
Cecile Tissot ◽  
Maria V. Fraga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Hippocratic Oath ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Medical Specialties ◽  
Portable Ultrasound ◽  
Do No Harm ◽  
Critically Ill Neonates ◽  
Procedure Guidance ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Abstract Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) refers to the use of portable ultrasound (US) applications at the bedside, performed directly by the treating physician, for either diagnostic or procedure guidance purposes. It is being rapidly adopted by traditionally non-imaging medical specialties across the globe. Recent international evidence-based guidelines on POCUS for critically ill neonates and children were issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Currently there are no standardized national or international guidelines for its implementation into clinical practice or even the training curriculum to monitor quality assurance. Further, there are no definitions or methods of POCUS competency measurement across its varied clinical applications.The Hippocratic Oath suggests medical providers do no harm to their patients. In our continued quest to uphold this value, providers seeking solutions to clinical problems must often weigh the benefit of an intervention with the risk of harm to the patient. Technologies to guide diagnosis and medical management present unique considerations when assessing possible risk to the patient. Frequently risk extends beyond the patient and impacts providers and the institutions in which they practice. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an emerging technology increasingly incorporated in the care of children across varied clinical specialties. Concerns have been raised by clinical colleagues and regulatory agencies regarding appropriate POCUS use and oversight. We present a framework for assessing the risk of POCUS use in pediatrics and suggest methods of mitigating risk to optimize safety and outcomes for patients, providers and institutions.

Point-of-care ultrasound in the neonatal intensive care unit: international perspectives

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Evans ◽  
Veronique Gournay ◽  
Fernando Cabanas ◽  
Martin Kluckow ◽  
Tina Leone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
International Perspectives

scholarly journals The role of lung ultrasound in preterm neonates with respiratory distress in neonatal intensive care unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 284-288
Author(s):  
Sidhant Swarup ◽  
Rakesh Panigrahi ◽  
Suryakanta Swain ◽  
Hemant Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

Introduction: Up to 29% of late preterm babies suffer from respiratory distress due to which they need to be admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Point-of-care ultrasound is a useful tool in critical neonate care, providing valuable information without any risk of ionizing radiation to the newborn. Materials and Method: This mono-centric, descriptive, and prospective study was conducted in NICU. Preterm newborns of less than 36 weeks with respiratory distress at birth on non-invasive ventilation were recruited. A lung ultrasound was performed at first 12 h of life and followed till their discharge. Main outcomes need for surfactant treatment. Results: Sixty preterm infants (median gestational age: 29 weeks) were recruited. Newborn in the surfactant group requiring ultrasound and intervention was significantly higher than in no surfactant group (p<0.0001). In 15 newborns who received surfactant, the first dose was administered at a median age of 4.5 h. In 13 of these 15 newborns, the lung ultrasound scan was subsequently repeated an average of 2 h (Standard deviation or SD: 2) On average, the second dose of surfactant was administered at 24 h of life (SD: 9). Conclusion: Early lung ultrasound in preterm infants with respiratory distress appears to be a useful tool with no adverse effects for the patient. It allows a better assessment of respiratory distress by detecting patients with a greater risk of requiring surfactant or mechanical ventilation, even before oxygenation criteria.

scholarly journals Recommendations for hemodynamic Monitoring for Critically Ill Children – Expert Consensus Statement issued by the Cardiovascular Dynamics Section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Javier Urbano Villaescusa ◽  
Eduardo M. da Cruz ◽  
Shane M Tibby ◽  
Gabriella Bottari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Hemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
European Society ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cardiovascular Dynamics ◽  
Hemodynamic Assessment

Abstract Background: Cardiovascular instability is common in critically-ill children. There is scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.Methods: Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature - a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document.Results: Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement”, 20 “weak agreement” and 2 had “no agreement”. Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following first round of voting. The agreed 72 recommendations were then coalesced into 36 detailing four key areas of hemodynamic monitoring in the main manuscript. Due to lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus.Conclusions: These expert consensus-based recommendation may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically-ill children and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.

scholarly journals Recommendations for hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill children—expert consensus statement issued by the cardiovascular dynamics section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Javier Urbano Villaescusa ◽  
Eduardo M. da Cruz ◽  
Shane M. Tibby ◽  
Gabriella Bottari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Hemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
European Society ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cardiovascular Dynamics ◽  
Hemodynamic Assessment

Abstract Background Cardiovascular instability is common in critically ill children. There is a scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Methods Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature—a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. Results Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement,” 20 “weak agreement,” and 2 had “no agreement.” Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following the first round of voting. The agreed 72 recommendations were then coalesced into 36 detailing four key areas of hemodynamic monitoring in the main manuscript. Due to a lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus. Conclusions These expert consensus-based recommendations may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.

Neonatal & Paediatric Point Of Care Ultrasound (Pocus): A Novel Standard Practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-131
Author(s):  
Dr. Abhijit Shinde ◽  
Dr. Sushrut Kumar ◽  
Dr. Sneha Mhaske
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Endotracheal Tube ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Standard Practice ◽  
Endotracheal Tube Placement ◽  
Growing Body

An ever expanding branch of applications have been developed for ultrasound, including its goal directed use at the bedside, often called point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). ).  Although neonatologist-performed functional echocardiography has been at the frontline of the worldwide growth of POCUS, a rapidly growing body of evidence has also demonstrated the importance of non-cardiac applications, including guidance of placement of central catheterisation and lumbar puncture, endotracheal tube localisation as well as rapid estimation of the brain, lungs, bladder and bowel.  Ultrasonography has become a pivotal adjunct to the care of neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU); but a full appreciation for its diagnostic capabilities in the NICU is lacking.(2) Ultrasonography (USG) is no longer the exclusive domain of radiologists and cardiologists. With appropriate training, clinician performed ultrasound (CPU) is now practised widely in obstetrics, emergency medicine and adult intensive care .In many developed countries,it is standard practice in neonatology. (3) In this review, we will discuss neonatal & pediatric point of care ultrasound (POCUS) as a novel standard practice & its clinical application for assessment of the head, heart, lung, gut, bladder, for vascular line localization & for endotracheal tube placement. As new applications and adoption of point-of-care ultrasound continues to gain acceptance in paediatric and neonatal medicine throughout the world, a rapidly growing body of evidence suggests that the result will be faster, safer and more successful diagnosis and treatment of our  patients.

Role of Lung Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Neonatal Respiratory Disorders

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nehal M El Raggal ◽  
laila A Hegazy ◽  
Hossam M Sakr ◽  
Yasmin A Farid ◽  
Osama A Eldafrawy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray

Abstract lung ultrasound (LUS) was used traditionally in the assessment of pleural effusions and masses but LUS has moved towards the imaging of the pulmonary parenchyma, mainly as a point-of-care technique. Objective To assess the agreement between LUS and CXR for the diagnosis of RD in neonates. Methods This prospective cross sectional study was conducted on 100 neonates presents with RD in the first 24 hours of life in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of the Ain Shams University. All enrolled neonates underwent LUS and CXR initially and on day 7. Neonatologists were blind to the LUS diagnosis and the clinical decisions were driven by CXR findings. Lung score was applied to describe lung aeration, interstitial, alveolar, or consolidation patterns for each lung area. Results 125 different diagnoses were reported in 100 patients. The total agreement between LUS and CXR diagnosis was 96% (95% CI 88–98%) with a κ statistic of 0.94 (95% CI 0.86– 1.00). The agreement for RDS, Pneumonia, TTN, MAS, CDH, PE, Pnumothorax and atelectasis were 99%, 96%,98%, 99%,100%,100%,98% and 98% consequently. Conclusion LUS is a safe, low coast, easy to operate and has high agreement with CXR for the diagnosis of RD in neonates in the first week of life. Key words Neonatal intensive care, Point-of-care ultrasound, Chest X-ray Abbreviations: NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, LUS: Lung ultrasound, CXR: Chest X ray, RDS: respiratory distress syndrome, TTN: Transient Tachypnea of Newborn, MAS: Meconium Aspiration, PE: pleural effusion, CDH: cong. diaphragmatic hernia.

scholarly journals Recommendations for hemodynamic Monitoring for Critically Ill Children – Expert Consensus Statement issued by the Cardiovascular Dynamics Section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogen Singh ◽  
Javier Urbano Villaescusa ◽  
Eduardo M. da Cruz ◽  
Shane M Tibby ◽  
Gabriella Bottari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Hemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
European Society ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cardiovascular Dynamics ◽  
Hemodynamic Assessment

Abstract Background Cardiovascular instability is common in critically-ill children. There is scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Methods Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature - a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. Results Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement”, 20 “weak agreement” and 2 had “no agreement”. Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following first round of voting. Due to lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus. Conclusions These expert consensus-based recommendation may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically-ill children and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document