scholarly journals Wine glass size and wine sales: four replication studies in one restaurant and two bars

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Clarke ◽  
Rachel Pechey ◽  
Mark Pilling ◽  
Gareth J. Hollands ◽  
Eleni Mantzari ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Clarke ◽  
Rachel Pechey ◽  
Mark Pilling ◽  
Gareth J Hollands ◽  
Eleni Mantzari ◽  
...  

Objective. Previous research suggests that wine glass size affects sales of wine in bars, with more wine purchased when served in larger glasses. The current four studies, conducted in one restaurant (Studies 1&2) and two bars (Studies 3&4) in Cambridge, England, aim to establish the reproducibility of this effect of glass size on sales. A multiple treatment reversal design was used, involving wine being served in sequential fortnightly periods in different sized glasses of the same design (290ml, 350ml, and 450ml). The primary outcome was daily wine volume (ml) sold. Results. Restaurant: Daily wine volume sold was 13% (95% CI: 2%,24%) higher when served with 350ml vs. 290ml glasses in Study 1. A similar direction of effect was seen in Study 2 (6%; 95% CI: -1%,15%). Bars: Daily wine volume sold was 21% (95% CI: 9%,35%) higher when served with 450ml vs. 350ml glasses in Study 3. This effect was not observed in Study 4 (-7%, 95% CI: -16%,3%). Meaningful differences were not demonstrated with any other glass comparison. These results partially replicate previous studies showing that larger glasses increase wine sales. Considerable uncertainty remains about the magnitude of any effect and the contexts in which it might occur.


BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j5623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zorana Zupan ◽  
Alexandra Evans ◽  
Dominique-Laurent Couturier ◽  
Theresa M Marteau
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Pechey ◽  
Dominique-Laurent Couturier ◽  
Gareth J. Hollands ◽  
Eleni Mantzari ◽  
Zorana Zupan ◽  
...  

Addiction ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (9) ◽  
pp. 1660-1667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Pilling ◽  
Natasha Clarke ◽  
Rachel Pechey ◽  
Gareth J. Hollands ◽  
Theresa M. Marteau
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Pechey ◽  
Dominique-Laurent Couturier ◽  
Gareth J. Hollands ◽  
Eleni Mantzari ◽  
Zorana Zupan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Pechey ◽  
Dominique-Laurent Couturier ◽  
Gareth J. Hollands ◽  
Eleni Mantzari ◽  
Marcus R. Munafò ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane T. Wegener ◽  
Leandre R. Fabrigar

AbstractReplications can make theoretical contributions, but are unlikely to do so if their findings are open to multiple interpretations (especially violations of psychometric invariance). Thus, just as studies demonstrating novel effects are often expected to empirically evaluate competing explanations, replications should be held to similar standards. Unfortunately, this is rarely done, thereby undermining the value of replication research.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris L. Žeželj ◽  
Biljana R. Jokić

Eyal, Liberman, and Trope (2008) established that people judged moral transgressions more harshly and virtuous acts more positively when the acts were psychologically distant than close. In a series of conceptual and direct replications, Gong and Medin (2012) came to the opposite conclusion. Attempting to resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted four high-powered replication studies in which we varied temporal distance (Studies 1 and 3), social distance (Study 2) or construal level (Study 4), and registered their impact on moral judgment. We found no systematic effect of temporal distance, the effect of social distance consistent with Eyal et al., and the reversed effect of direct construal level manipulation, consistent with Gong and Medin. Possible explanations for the incompatible results are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Kvarven ◽  
Eirik Strømland ◽  
Magnus Johannesson

Andrews & Kasy (2019) propose an approach for adjusting effect sizes in meta-analysis for publication bias. We use the Andrews-Kasy estimator to adjust the result of 15 meta-analyses and compare the adjusted results to 15 large-scale multiple labs replication studies estimating the same effects. The pre-registered replications provide precisely estimated effect sizes, which do not suffer from publication bias. The Andrews-Kasy approach leads to a moderate reduction of the inflated effect sizes in the meta-analyses. However, the approach still overestimates effect sizes by a factor of about two or more and has an estimated false positive rate of between 57% and 100%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document