scholarly journals Levosimendan use in patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction with or without severe renal dysfunction in critical cardiac care units: a multi-institution database study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cze-Ci Chan ◽  
Kuang-Tso Lee ◽  
Wan-Jing Ho ◽  
Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
Pao-Hsien Chu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Care ◽  
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Cohort Entry ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Abnormal Renal Function

Abstract Background Acute heart failure is a life-threatening clinical condition. Levosimendan is an effective inotropic agent used to maintain cardiac output, but its usage is limited by the lack of evidence in patients with severely abnormal renal function. Therefore, we analyzed data of patients with acute heart failure with and without abnormal renal function to examine the effects of levosimendan. Methods We performed this retrospective cohort study using data from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). Patients admitted for heart failure with LVEF ≤ 40% between January 2013 and December 2018 who received levosimendan or dobutamine in the critical cardiac care units (CCU) were identified. Patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were mortality at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date. Results There were no significant differences in mortality rate at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date between the levosimendan and dobutamine groups, or between subgroups of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or on dialysis. The results were consistent before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Levosimendan did not increase short- or long-term mortality rates in critical patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction compared to dobutamine, regardless of their renal function. An eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was not necessarily considered a contraindication for levosimendan in these patients.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF RIGHT HEART CATHETERIZATION IN ACUTE HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 726
Author(s):  
Samarthkumar Thakkar ◽  
Harsh Patel ◽  
Kirtenkumar Patel ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Smit Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals 412 Sacubitril/valsartan promotes cardiac reverse remodeling and preserves renal function in a real-world heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) population

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M V Polito ◽  
A Rispoli ◽  
V Vitulano ◽  
F D"auria ◽  
A Silverio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
P Value ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements none Aims. To evaluate the effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters and outcomes in a real-world population with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results. Prospective study enrolling consecutive patients with HFrEF treated with S/V.The primary outcome was HF rehospitalization;secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiac death and the composite of cardiac death and HF rehospitalization at 12 months follow up.The clinical outcome was compared with a retrospective cohort of 90 HFrEF patients treated with standard medical therapy by using propensity score weighting. At 6 months follow-up, changes in symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, eGFR and furosemide dose were also evaluated. The study population consisted of 90 patients (66.1 ± 11.7 years). At 6 months FU, a significant improvement in NYHA class, LVEF (from 31.0% to 34.0%; p = 0.001), LVESV (from 115.0 to 101.0 mL; p = 0.033) and sPAP (from 31.0 to 25.0 mmHg; p = 0.024) was observed. Moreover, S/V did not affect negatively eGFR and was associated with a significantly lower dose of furosemide prescribed. The propensity score weighting adjusted regression analysis showed a significantly lower risk for HF rehospitalization (HR, 0.131; 95% CI, 0.034-0.503; p = 0.003) and the composite outcome (HR, 0.162; 95% CI, 0.053-0.492; p = 0.001) among patients treated with S/V as compared to the standard therapy group. Conclusions In this real-world HFrEF population, S/V reduced HF rehospitalization and cardiac death at 1 year. Moreover, S/V improved significantly NYHA class, LVEF, LVESV and sPAP at 6 months, preserving renal function and reducing the need of furosemide. Table Study outcomes Unadjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.273 0.101-0.740 0.011 Cardiac death 0.443 0.137-1.440 0.176 Composite outcome 0.331 0.155-0.710 0.005 All-cause death 0.666 0.272-1.628 0.372 Adjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.131 0.034-0.503 0.003 Cardiac death 0.259 0.047-1.415 0.119 Composite outcome 0.162 0.053-0.492 0.001 All-cause death 0.713 0.201-2.529 0.601 Adjusted and unadjusted HR for the study outcomes. Abstract 412 Figure.

507 Acute heart failure: A comparison of preserved and reduced ejection fraction in the emergency department

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. S245-S246
Author(s):  
J.A. Ezekowitz ◽  
S. Lepage ◽  
S. Virani ◽  
R. Leader ◽  
M. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Burden of Recurrent Hospitalizations Following an Admission for Acute Heart Failure: Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Santas ◽  
Ernesto Valero ◽  
Anna Mollar ◽  
Sergio García-Blas ◽  
Patricia Palau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Ultrafiltration in Acute Heart Failure: Implications of Ejection Fraction and Early Response to Treatment From CARRESS‐HF

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marat Fudim ◽  
Jeremy Brooksbank ◽  
Anna Giczewska ◽  
Stephen J. Greene ◽  
Justin L. Grodin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Fluid Removal ◽  
Worsening Renal Function ◽  
Differential Outcomes

Background Ultrafiltration is not commonly used because of higher incidence of worsening renal function without improved decongestion. We examined differential outcomes of high versus low fluid removal and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction (EF) in CARRESS‐HF (Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure). Methods and Results Baseline characteristics in the ultrafiltration arm were compared according to 24‐hour ultrafiltration‐based fluid removal above versus below the median. Patients were stratified by EF (≤40% or >40%). We compared clinical parameters of clinical decongestion during the hospitalization based on initial (≤24 hours) response to ultrafiltration. Cox‐proportional hazards models were used to identify associations between fluid removal <24 hours and composite of death, hospitalization, or unscheduled outpatient/emergency department visit during study follow‐up. The intention‐to‐treat analysis included 93 patients. Within 24 hours, median fluid removal was 1.89 L (Q1, Q3: 1.22, 3.16). The high fluid removal group had a greater urine output (9.08 versus 6.23 L, P =0.027) after 96 hours. Creatinine change from baseline to 96 hours was similar in both groups (0.10 mg/dL increase, P =0.610). The EF >40% group demonstrated larger increases of change in creatinine ( P =0.023) and aldosterone ( P =0.038) from baseline to 96 hours. Among patients with EF >40%, those with above median fluid removal (n=17) when compared with below median (n=17) had an increased rate of the combined end point (87.5% versus 47.1%, P =0.014). Conclusions In patients with acute heart failure, higher initial fluid removal with ultrafiltration had no association with worsening renal function. In patients with EF >40%, ultrafiltration was associated with worsening renal function irrespective of fluid removal rate and higher initial fluid removal was associated with higher rates of adverse clinical outcomes, highlighting variable responses to decongestive therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document