scholarly journals The use of external electronic tags on fish: an evaluation of tag retention and tagging effects

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Jepsen ◽  
Eva B. Thorstad ◽  
Torgeir Havn ◽  
Martyn C. Lucas
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan J. Runde ◽  
Jeffrey A. Buckel ◽  
Nathan M. Bacheler ◽  
Ryan M. Tharp ◽  
Paul J. Rudershausen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn N. Wagner ◽  
Steven J. Cooke ◽  
Richard S. Brown ◽  
Katherine A. Deters

Author(s):  
Jessica Nelson ◽  
Andrew M. Rous ◽  
Adrienne R. McLean ◽  
Jessica Barber ◽  
Gale A. Bravener ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Smith ◽  
Thomas H. Selby ◽  
Michael S. Cherkiss ◽  
Andrew G. Crowder ◽  
Zandy Hillis-Starr ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Bernardo Mascarenhas Alves

Rio Paraopeba, a tributary of rio São Francisco, has a six-meter high dam, built in 1978 to divert water to the Igarapé Thermal Power Plant. In 1994, a fish ladder was built at this dam. The results of a marking and recapture program carried out along rio Paraopeba between 1997 and 2001 are described, using information from fish community studies conducted at ten sampling stations between 1994 and 1997. These investigations showed the presence of at least 91 species in the river. During four rainy seasons between 1997 and 2000, fish were caught downstream of the dam, marked with external plastic tags, and immediately released at the same site. The objective was to evaluate fish passage through the ladder, based on recapture information from artisanal and sport fishermen. A total of 3,642 specimens were marked, adding up to a biomass of approximately 1.33 tons. Twenty-six species were used, representing 28.5% of the total recorded richness (91 species). Maximum recorded tag retention time was 10 months. Total recapture rate was 4.37% in four years, reaching 5.75% in the last period (2000-2001). Of all recaptured specimens, 14.0% were caught upstream of the dam, evidencing passage through the ladder. The specimens recaptured upstream of the dam belonged to three species: piau-verdadeiro (Leporinus obtusidens), mandi-amarelo (Pimelodus maculatus) and curimatá-pioa (Prochilodus costatus). These species showed linear home ranges of 15.4, 81.5 and 232.0 km, respectively. Most recaptures occurred immediately downstream of the dam, one of the most intensely fished stretches of rio Paraopeba.


1999 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1409-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C Fabrizio ◽  
James D Nichols ◽  
James E Hines ◽  
Bruce L Swanson ◽  
Stephen T Schram

Data from mark-recapture studies are used to estimate population rates such as exploitation, survival, and growth. Many of these applications assume negligible tag loss, so tag shedding can be a significant problem. Various tag shedding models have been developed for use with data from double-tagging experiments, including models to estimate constant instantaneous rates, time-dependent rates, and type I and II shedding rates. In this study, we used conditional (on recaptures) multinomial models implemented using the program SURVIV (G.C. White. 1983. J. Wildl. Manage. 47: 716-728) to estimate tag shedding rates of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and explore various potential sources of variation in these rates. We applied the models to data from several long-term double-tagging experiments with Lake Superior lake trout and estimated shedding rates for anchor tags in hatchery-reared and wild fish and for various tag types applied in these experiments. Estimates of annual tag retention rates for lake trout were fairly high (80-90%), but we found evidence (among wild fish only) that retention rates may be significantly lower in the first year due to type I losses. Annual retention rates for some tag types varied between male and female fish, but there was no consistent pattern across years. Our estimates of annual tag retention rates will be used in future studies of survival rates for these fish.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document