scholarly journals Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth, and fish welfare

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan J. Runde ◽  
Jeffrey A. Buckel ◽  
Nathan M. Bacheler ◽  
Ryan M. Tharp ◽  
Paul J. Rudershausen ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Jepsen ◽  
Eva B. Thorstad ◽  
Torgeir Havn ◽  
Martyn C. Lucas

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn N. Wagner ◽  
Steven J. Cooke ◽  
Richard S. Brown ◽  
Katherine A. Deters

Aquaculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 534 ◽  
pp. 736304
Author(s):  
Su Mei Wu ◽  
Jung-Ren Chen ◽  
Chin-yen Chang ◽  
Yu-Jen Tseng ◽  
Bonnie Sun Pan

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2164
Author(s):  
Ignacio de la Rosa ◽  
Pedro L. Castro ◽  
Rafael Ginés

The behavioural responses of fish to a stressful situation must be considered an adverse reaction caused by the perception of pain. Consequently, the handling prior to stunning and the immediacy of loss consciousness following stunning are the aspects to take into account during the slaughtering process. The most common commercial stunning method in seabream and seabass is based on hypothermia, but other methods such as electrical stunning, carbon dioxide narcosis or anaesthetic with clove oil, are discussed in relation to the time to reach the unconsciousness stage and some welfare indicators. Although seawater plus ice slurry is currently accepted in some guidelines of fish welfare well practices at slaughter, it cannot be considered completely adequate due to the deferred speed at which cause loss of consciousness. New methods of incorporating some kind of anaesthetic in the stunning tank could be a solution to minimize the impact on the welfare of seabass and seabream at slaughtering.


Marine Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 104530
Author(s):  
Kristine Vedal Størkersen ◽  
Tonje C. Osmundsen ◽  
Lars Helge Stien ◽  
Christian Medaas ◽  
Marianne Elisabeth Lien ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Smith ◽  
Thomas H. Selby ◽  
Michael S. Cherkiss ◽  
Andrew G. Crowder ◽  
Zandy Hillis-Starr ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia Martins ◽  
Ana Valentim ◽  
Nuno Pereira ◽  
Luis Marques Antunes

The number of fish used in research has increased in the last decades. Anaesthesia is required when fish must be held immobile and it is crucial to promote fish welfare, because these vertebrates can show signs of stress and/or pain during handling, transport, tagging, sampling and invasive procedures. The use of an inadequate anaesthetic protocol can compromise not only the welfare of the fish, but also the reliability of the research results. Thus, the development of suitable anaesthetic regimes for each fish species is important. This article reviews the main anaesthetic and analgesic agents used in adult fish in a research setting.


2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Bernardo Mascarenhas Alves

Rio Paraopeba, a tributary of rio São Francisco, has a six-meter high dam, built in 1978 to divert water to the Igarapé Thermal Power Plant. In 1994, a fish ladder was built at this dam. The results of a marking and recapture program carried out along rio Paraopeba between 1997 and 2001 are described, using information from fish community studies conducted at ten sampling stations between 1994 and 1997. These investigations showed the presence of at least 91 species in the river. During four rainy seasons between 1997 and 2000, fish were caught downstream of the dam, marked with external plastic tags, and immediately released at the same site. The objective was to evaluate fish passage through the ladder, based on recapture information from artisanal and sport fishermen. A total of 3,642 specimens were marked, adding up to a biomass of approximately 1.33 tons. Twenty-six species were used, representing 28.5% of the total recorded richness (91 species). Maximum recorded tag retention time was 10 months. Total recapture rate was 4.37% in four years, reaching 5.75% in the last period (2000-2001). Of all recaptured specimens, 14.0% were caught upstream of the dam, evidencing passage through the ladder. The specimens recaptured upstream of the dam belonged to three species: piau-verdadeiro (Leporinus obtusidens), mandi-amarelo (Pimelodus maculatus) and curimatá-pioa (Prochilodus costatus). These species showed linear home ranges of 15.4, 81.5 and 232.0 km, respectively. Most recaptures occurred immediately downstream of the dam, one of the most intensely fished stretches of rio Paraopeba.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document