scholarly journals Safety and visual outcomes following posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens bilensectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Vargas ◽  
Jorge L. Alió ◽  
Rafael I. Barraquer ◽  
Justin Christopher D’ Antin ◽  
Cristina García ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212093498
Author(s):  
Emma S Duignan ◽  
Clare Quigley ◽  
Maxwell P Treacy ◽  
Azher Eldouri ◽  
Michael O’Keefe

Background/aims: To evaluate the visual outcomes and indication for surgery in a series of patients who underwent explantation of a phakic intraocular lens (PIOL). Methods: A retrospective case series of patients who underwent PIOL explantation in our institution was performed. The indication for explantation and visual and refractive outcomes were examined. The method of explantation is described. Results: Twenty-two eyes of 16 patients underwent PIOL explantation with a mean time to explantation of 7 ± 3 years (range 3–11.4). The mean age at explantation was 50.3 ± 9.3 years. Sixteen Artisan PIOLs and six Artiflex PIOLs were explanted. The indications for explanation were cataract development (17/22), endothelial cell loss (4/22) and synechiae formation (1/22). All patients with cataract underwent a combined procedure with explantation and phacoemulsification and the placement of a posterior chamber IOL. Mean corrected vision after explantation was 0.22 ± 0.10 logMAR (range 0.1–0.3 logMAR). One patient with endothelial cell loss required a Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK). Conclusion: Removal of PIOLs was necessitated most frequently by cataract followed by endothelial cell loss. Both explantation alone and explantation with concurrent phacoemulsification are safe procedures with good visual outcomes and will become more frequent in the future as more patients with PIOLs reach cataractous age.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 1023-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Necip Torun ◽  
Eckart Bertelmann ◽  
Matthias K.J. Klamann ◽  
Anna-Karina Maier ◽  
Anja Liekfeld ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M Davidorf ◽  
Roberto Zaldivar ◽  
Susana Oscherow

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Zaldivar ◽  
Jonathan M Davidorf ◽  
Susana Oscherow

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilek Yaşa ◽  
Ufuk Ürdem ◽  
Alper Ağca ◽  
Yusuf Yildirim ◽  
Burçin Kepez Yildiz ◽  
...  

Purpose. To report clinical results of a foldable, hydrophilic acrylic, single-piece, injectable, posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL).Material and Methods. Medical records of patients who underwent posterior chamber phakic IOL (Eyecryl Phakic IOL, Biotech Vision Care, Ahmedabad, India) implantation for surgical correction of myopia were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with at least a one-year follow-up were included. Manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and pIOL vault were analyzed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Complications observed during and after surgery were also recorded.Results. The study included 58 eyes of 29 patients. Mean patient age was 32 ± 7 years. Spherical equivalent of manifest refraction was −13.41 ± 3.23 D preoperatively and −0.44 ± 0.55 D postoperatively. Preoperative CDVA was 0.29 ± 0.71 logMAR. Postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 0.21 ± 0.66 and 0.15 ± 0.69 logMAR, respectively, at the 12-month visit. At the 12-month visit, the efficacy index was 1.20 and the safety index was 1.39. Mean ECD was 2713 ± 339 cells/mm2at the preoperative visit and 2608 ± 362 cells/mm2at the 12-month visit (3.9% loss,p<0.001). ECD loss from 3 months to 12 months was not statistically significant. No significant cataract formation, significant endothelial cell loss, glaucoma, uveitis, or any other vision-threatening complication was observed.Conclusion. Based on postoperative experience, we have found that Eyecryl Phakic IOL is safe and effective for treating high myopia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document