scholarly journals Treatment of cephalic arch stenosis in dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas with paclitaxel-coated versus conventional balloon angioplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ren Kwang A. Tng ◽  
Ru Yu. Tan ◽  
Shereen X. Y. Soon ◽  
Suh Chien. Pang ◽  
Chieh Suai. Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Index Procedure ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Conventional Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Background Treatment of cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) with standard plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), is associated with early re-stenosis and higher failure rates compared to other lesions. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) may improve patency rates. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent POBA or PCB for CAS over a 3-year period were included. Outcomes compared were circuit primary patency rates (patency from index procedure to next intervention), circuit primary assisted-patency rates (patency from index procedure to thrombosis), and target lesion (CAS) patency rates (stenosis > 50%) at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results Ninety-one patients were included. Sixty-five (71.4%) had POBA, while 26 (28.6%) had PCB angioplasty. There were 62 (68.1%) de-novo lesions. CAS was the only lesion that needed treatment in 24 (26.4%) patients. Circuit primary patency rates for POBA versus PCB groups were 76.2% vs. 60% (p = 0.21), 43.5% vs. 36% (p = 0.69) and 22% vs. 9.1% (p = 0.22) at 3, 6 and 12-months respectively. Circuit assisted-primary patency rates were 93.7% vs. 92% (p = 1.00), 87.1% vs. 80% (p = 0.51) and 76.3% vs. 81.8% (p = 0.77), whilst CAS target lesion intervention-free patency rates were 79.4% vs. 68% (p = 0.40), 51.6% vs. 52% (p = 1.00) and 33.9% vs. 22.7% (p = 0.49) at 3, 6 and 12-months respectively. Estimated mean time to target lesion intervention was 215 ± 183.2 days for POBA and 225 ± 186.6 days for PCB (p = 0.20). Conclusion Treatment of CAS with PCB did not improve target lesion or circuit patency rates compared to POBA.

scholarly journals Angioplasty for dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas: a meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials compared paclitaxel-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Yang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Kui Cai ◽  
Yufang Chen ◽  
Congying Xia
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neointimal Hyperplasia ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Conventional Balloon Angioplasty

Abstract Background Stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) due to neointimal hyperplasia is one of the most common causes of hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction. Treating patients with dysfunctional AVF with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may potentially improve outcomes. This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of DCB angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty by pooling evidence from the most recent randomized controlled trials. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane central databases. Two independent researchers screened the article, extracted interest and evaluated included studies for risk of bias. Pooled estimation was conducted in terms of 6-month target-lesion primary patency (TLPP) and target-lesion reintervention (TLR), as well as other outcomes. Results were expressed with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 4 RCTs were identified and included in the meta-analyses, with 911 participants. There was no significant increase in rates of 6-month TLPP (OR 1.63, 95%CI 0.39–6.79, p = 0.35), or decrease in 6-month TLR (OR 0.45, 95%CI 0.17–1.19 p = 0.07) in patients who received DCB as compared to those who received conventional balloon angioplasty. Similarly, we found no difference in the 6-month access circuit primary patency and reinvention between the two groups. Conclusion There was no evidence supporting that DCB has a statistically significant higher rate of TLPP and lower rates of TLR in the treatment of dysfunctional AVF than conventional balloon angioplasty. However, DCB was non-inferior to conventional balloon angioplasty in terms of safety. Therefore, further study is needed to clarify whether DCB angioplasty can benefit hemodialysis patients with dysfunction AVF.

Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for treatment of failing arteriovenous fistulas and grafts in haemodialysis patients: A retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110670
Author(s):  
Shereen XY Soon ◽  
Ru Yu Tan ◽  
Suh Chien Pang ◽  
Charyl JQ Yap ◽  
Ankur Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
End Stage Renal Failure ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Conventional Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Aim was to compare the safety and patency efficacy outcomes between Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB)- versus conventional balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of haemodialysis access-related conduit stenosis. Methods: Retrospective single-centre, multi-investigator, consecutive, double-arm comparative cohort study. About 130 end-stage renal failure Asian patients with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft underwent PCB or POBA fistuloplasty between November 2018 and June 2020. All stenotic lesions were prepared with high pressure non-compliant balloon angioplasty prior to PCB angioplasty. All patients received at least one antiplatelet agent for 3 months duration post procedure. Results: Mean age was 66.0 ± 10 years and 79/130 (61%) were males. PCB arm ( n = 65) versus POBA arm ( n = 65). Majority were AVFs circuits (122/130, 94%). Main indication for intervention was dropping access flow (98/130, 76%). About 172 lesions were treated (56% POBA, 44% PCB), and the juxta-anastomosis (JAS) was the main target lesion (87/172, 51%). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes (30-day adverse events, access thrombosis, abandoned AVF and death) between treatment groups. Mean time to target lesion reintervention (TLR) was longer in PCB-treated lesions (7.1 ± 2.7 vs 5.8 ± 3.2 months, p = 0.03), especially amongst recurrent lesions (7.3 ± 2.4 vs 5.7 ± 3.2, p = 0.02). Mean time to circuit reintervention was also longer in PCB-treated circuits (6.9 ± 2.8 vs 5.8 ± 3.7months, p = 0.04). There were 16 deaths (12%), all attributed to patient’s underlying comorbidities. Conclusions: Fistuloplasty with Ranger™ PCB for failing arteriovenous circuits in end-stage renal failure patients, is a safe and efficacious modality compared to POBA in terms of longer freedom from TLR.

Plain versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in arteriovenous fistula and graft stenosis: An umbrella review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110052
Author(s):  
Miltos K Lazarides ◽  
Eleni Christaina ◽  
George A Antoniou ◽  
Christos Argyriou ◽  
Gregory Trypsianis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Graft Stenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses

An umbrella review was performed to synthesize the evidence from systematic reviews/meta-analyses of clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) vs. conventional balloon angioplasty in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts stenosis. Medline (via PubMed) and SCOPUS databases were searched up to July 15th 2020. All meta-analyses that enrolled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCB with plain balloons in AVFs and grafts were included. Re-analysis of original data was performed assessing predictive intervals (PI). Quality of the included meta-analyses was assessed using AMSTAR score. Eight meta-analyses were included and four clinical outcomes [target lesion primary patency (TLPP), circuit primary patency, mortality, complication rate] derived from 14 RCTs, were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the TLPP in meta-analyses providing data purely from autologous AVFs. Significant benefits regarding TLPP and circuit primary patency at 3, 6, and 12-months in favor of PCB were reported in four meta-analyses mixing AVFs and grafts; however when PI were assessed, in all but one meta-analysis these included the null value, indicating no significant benefit. In only one meta-analysis significant difference of TLPP at 12-months in favor of PCB was noticed. (Odds Ratio 0.0009 PI: 0.28-0.85) No mortality difference was noticed in four meta-analyses providing data up to 24 months. In conclusion this overview revealed a modest benefit of using PCB angioplasty compared to plain angioplasty in AVFs and graft stenosis. No increased mortality was noticed in the PCB group.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons in the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions (AcoArt II–BTK)

2020 ◽  
pp. 152660282096968
Author(s):  
Xin Jia ◽  
Baixi Zhuang ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Yongquan Gu ◽  
Jiwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose To compare the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) vs uncoated balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo and restenotic infrapopliteal lesions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Materials and Methods The prospective, multicenter, randomized study AcoArt II–BTK study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02137577) enrolled 120 patients who were randomly assigned to angioplasty with either a DCB (n=61; mean age 70.7±7.4 years; 36 men) or a conventional balloon catheter (n=59; mean age 70.8±9.0 years; 36 men). There were no significant differences observed in baseline clinical or target lesion characteristics between the groups. The target lesion length was 169.95±86.35 mm in the DCB group vs 179.93±80.16 mm in the control group, and approximately three-quarters of the lesions were chronic occlusions. Primary patency was assessed by angiography at 6 months, and mortality and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were evaluated at 12 months. Results Primary patency at 6 months was 75.0% in the DCB group and 28.3% in the control group (p<0.001), while late lumen loss was 0.43±0.62 mm for DCBs vs 0.99±0.55 mm for controls (p<0.001). Freedom from CD-TLR at 12 months was 91.5% in the DCB group vs 76.8% in the controls (p=0.03); there was no significant difference in mortality (1.7% DCB vs 3.6% controls; p=0.53). Conclusion This study demonstrated that the Litos/Tulip DCBs are safe and effective in treating infrapopliteal lesions, with improved angiographic and clinical outcomes vs plain balloon angioplasty. The DCBs demonstrated significantly higher primary patency with fewer CD-TLRs than conventional angioplasty. The safety of the DCBs was noninferior to that of the uncoated balloons after 1 year of follow-up.

scholarly journals Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery: study protocol for the randomized controlled SIRONA trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulf Teichgräber ◽  
Maja Ingwersen ◽  
Stephanie Platzer ◽  
Thomas Lehmann ◽  
Thomas Zeller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Femoropopliteal Artery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background Endovascular revascularization has established as the first-line therapy of femoropopliteal artery disease. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty proved to be superior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) regarding prevention of restenosis and need for recurrent revascularization. Over the past years, paclitaxel was the only active drug to inhibit neointimal proliferation which could be processed to an appropriate balloon coating. The purpose of this study is to assess whether efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is noninferior to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. Methods This randomized controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, investigator-initiated noninferiority trial aims to enrol a total of 478 participants with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease of Rutherford category 2 to 4 due to de novo stenosis or restenosis. After pre-dilation, participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either sirolimus- or paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. Post-dilation with the drug-coated balloon (DCB) used or standard balloon is mandatory in case ≥ 50%, and optional in case of ≥ 30% residual diameter stenosis. Bailout stenting with bare-metal nitinol stents should be conducted in case of flow-limiting dissection. Primary noninferiority endpoints are primary patency and the composite of all-cause mortality, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are clinical and hemodynamic improvement, change in health-related quality of life, and safety throughout 60 months. Discussion Although concerns about long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices were not confirmed by recent patient-level data analyses, conflicting evidence contributed to a loss of confidence among patients and physicians. Therefore, sirolimus, known for a broader therapeutic range than paclitaxel, may serve as a welcome alternative. This will be justified if noninferiority of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty against the current standard of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty can be demonstrated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04475783. Registered on 17 July 2020 EUDAMED No. CIV-20-11-035172, DRKS00022452

scholarly journals Association between post-balloon angioplasty dissection and primary patency in complex femoropopliteal artery disease: 2-year clinical outcomes of the AcoArt I trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052110065
Author(s):  
Hao Ren ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Jiwei Zhang ◽  
Baixi Zhuang ◽  
Weiguo Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Femoropopliteal Artery ◽  
Artery Disease

Objective To assess the association between post-balloon angioplasty dissection and the mid-term results of the AcoArt I trial evaluating complex femoropopliteal artery disease. Methods The outcome data for 144 patients from the AcoArt 1 trial were reanalysed. These patients were randomly divided into percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) groups. The primary endpoint was the primary patency (PP) rate and clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation at 24 months. Results After 24 months of follow-up, the PP rate of dissection cases in the PTA group was lower vs non-dissection cases. In patients receiving a bailout stent for dissection, the PP rate in the PTA group was lower vs the DCB group. Cox regression analysis showed that dissection decreased the PP rate; mild dissection reduced the PP rate as follows: 52%, PTA group and 19%, DCB group. With severe dissection, the PP rate reduction was as follows: 75%, PTA group and 73%, DCB group. Conclusions The mid-term follow-up showed that post-balloon angioplasty dissection reduced the PP rate in the PTA group but not in the DCB group. Additionally, in patients receiving a bailout stent for dissection, the DCB group had a better PP rate than the PTA group.

Treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses for failing distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: Drug-coated balloons versus angioplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Patanè ◽  
Giovanni Failla ◽  
Giovanni Coniglio ◽  
Giorgio Russo ◽  
Walter Morale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Type A ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Type B ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

The aim of our study is to report the results of two types (type A, type B) paclitaxel drug-coated balloon compared with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses of mature but failing distal radiocephalic hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. Two groups of 26 and 44 patients treated with two different drug-coated balloon are compared with a control group of 86 treated with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A color Doppler ultrasound was performed to evaluate stenosis and for treatment planning. We assess primary patency, defined as the absence of dysfunction of the arteriovenous fistulas, patent lesion or residual stenosis < 30% and no need for further reintervention of target lesion. Primary patency and secondary patency are evaluated after 12 months with color Doppler ultrasound for the whole arteriovenous fistulas, defined as absolute (absolute primary patency, absolute secondary patency) and target lesion. Postprocedural technical and clinical success was 100%. After 12 months, absolute primary patency is 81.8% for type A, 84.1% type B, and 54.7% for standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; target lesion primary patency is 92% type A, 86.4% type B, and 62.8% standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; absolute secondary patency is 95.4% type A, 95.5% type B, and 80.7% standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; target lesion secondary patency is 100% type A, 97.7% type B, and 80.7% standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. All the patients treated with drug-coated balloon (type A + type B) have an absolute primary patency of 83.3%, a target lesion primary patency of 87.9%, an absolute secondary patency of 95.5%, and a target lesion secondary patency of 98.4%. Our study confirms that the use of drug-coated balloon, indiscriminately among different brands, improves primary patency with statistically significant difference in comparison with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and decreases reintervention of target lesion in juxta-anastomotic stenoses of failing distal arteriovenous fistulas maintaining the radiocephalic fistula as long as possible.

Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Long Infrapopliteal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aljoscha Rastan ◽  
Marianne Brodmann ◽  
Tanja Böhme ◽  
Roland Macharzina ◽  
Elias Noory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Target Vessel ◽  
Target Vessel Revascularization ◽  
Infrapopliteal Artery ◽  
Directional Atherectomy ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Background: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials show no beneficial impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy alone on the technical and clinical outcomes of infrapopliteal artery lesions in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of directional atherectomy (DA) plus DCB angioplasty versus DCB alone in treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, 2-center trial comparing the performance of DA+DCB and DCB alone in treatment of 80 patients with de novo infrapopliteal artery lesions. The primary study end point was the 6-month primary patency of the target lesion detected by angiography and duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included clinically driven target vessel revascularization, amputation rates, and changes in Rutherford-Becker class at 1 year. A core laboratory provides independent analyses for all scheduled and unscheduled duplex ultrasound examinations and angiographies, and a research institute ensured independent data collection. Results: The mean target lesion length was 179.7±98.2 mm. Nine patients (11.3%) died during the follow-up period. At 6 months, primary patency was 49% (n=18) with DA+DCB versus 34% (n=12) with DCB alone ( P =0.241), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization was 8% (n=3) versus 14% (n=5; P =0.475), respectively. At 1 year, the TLR rates were 30% (n=10) versus 43% (n=12; P =0.308), the median in Rutherford-Becker class was 2 (0.25–5) versus 5 (0.25–5; P =0.329), and amputation rates were 22% (n=8) versus 32% (n=11; P =0.618) in the DA+DCB group and the DCB group, respectively. Conclusions: Treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions with DA+DCB versus DCB alone leads to comparable clinical and technical results at 6 months and 1 year. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01763476.

Endovascular salvage of failing arterio-venous fistulas utilising sirolimus eluting balloons: Six months results from the ISABELLA trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110670
Author(s):  
Tjun Y Tang ◽  
Shereen XY Soon ◽  
Charyl JQ Yap ◽  
Ru Yu Tan ◽  
Suh Chien Pang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Pilot Clinical Study ◽  
Procedural Success ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Subject Dropout

Background: Aim of this pilot clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR)™ sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) for improving failing arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) patency in Asian haemodialysis patients. Methods: Prospective single-centre, multi-investigator, non-consecutive, non-blinded single arm trial. Forty end-stage renal failure Asian patients with a dysfunctional AVF underwent SEB angioplasty between May and November 2020. All stenotic lesions were prepared with high pressure non-compliant balloon angioplasty prior to SEB angioplasty. Endpoints of interest included target lesion primary patency and circuit access patency and safety through 30 days. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 month and were followed up with Duplex ultrasound at 6 months. Results: There was one subject dropout so final n = 39 patients (mean age 65.0 ± 11.9; males = 26 (66.7%)) and n = 43 target lesions treated. Main indication for intervention was dropping access flow (24/39; 61.5%) and most common target lesion was in the juxta-anastomosis (24/43; 54.5%). There was 100% technical and procedural success. There were no adverse events related to the SEB. Target lesion primary patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 39/41 (95.1%) and 28/39 (71.8%) respectively. Access circuit patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 35/37 (94.6%) and 22/35 (62.9%) respectively. There were 3 (7.7%) deaths all attributable to patients’ underlying co-morbidities. Conclusions: Fistuloplasty using the novel Selution SLR™ SEB for dysfunctional AVF circuits seems a safe and effective modality in Asian haemodialysis patients at 6 months but larger randomised controlled studies are required now to determine its true efficacy against plain balloon angioplasty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document