Development of a Teaching Tool for Women With a Gynecologic Malignancy Undergoing Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted Surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-410
Author(s):  
Luisa Luciani Castiglia ◽  
Nancy Drummond ◽  
Margaret A. Purden
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (05) ◽  
pp. 286-291
Author(s):  
Drew Gunnells ◽  
Jamie Cannon

AbstractSurgery for Crohn's disease presents unique challenges secondary to the inflammatory nature of the disease. While a minimally invasive approach to colorectal surgery has consistently been associated with better patient outcomes, adoption of laparoscopy in Crohn's disease has been limited due to these challenges. Robotic assisted surgery has the potential to overcome these challenges and allow more complex patients to undergo a minimally invasive operation. Here we describe our approach to robotic assisted surgery for terminal ileal Crohn's disease.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1109-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Du ◽  
Maximilian Allan ◽  
Alessio Dore ◽  
Sebastien Ourselin ◽  
David Hawkes ◽  
...  

Angiology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry W. Donias ◽  
Hratch L. Karamanoukian ◽  
Giuseppe D'Ancona ◽  
Eddie L. Hoover

2020 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 723-728
Author(s):  
Joan R. Tymon-Rosario ◽  
Devin T. Miller ◽  
Akiva P. Novetsky ◽  
Gary L. Goldberg ◽  
Nicole S. Nevadunsky ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 160-161
Author(s):  
A.R. Van Arsdale ◽  
J. Tymon-Rosario ◽  
D.T. Miller ◽  
A.P. Novetsky ◽  
G.L. Goldberg ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1115-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari L. Ring ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
Lesley B. Conrad ◽  
William Burke ◽  
R. Wendel Naumann ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo evaluate the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in gynecologic oncology fellowship training and fellows’ predictions of their use of MIS in their future practice.MethodsAll fellows-in-training in American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology–approved training programs were surveyed in 2012 through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared to results of a similar 2007 survey.ResultsOf 172 fellows, 69 (40%) responded. Ninety-nine percent of respondents (n = 68) indicated that MIS was either very important or important in gynecologic oncology, a proportion essentially unchanged from 2007 (100%). Compared to 2007, greater proportions of fellows considered laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and node dissection for cervical cancer (87% vs 54%; P < 0.0001) and trachelectomy and staging for cervical cancer (83% vs 32%; P < 0.0001) appropriate for MIS. Of the respondents, 92% believed that maximum or some emphasis should be placed on robotic-assisted surgery and 89% on traditional laparoscopy during fellowship training. Ten percent rated their fellowship training in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery as very poor; 44% said that the question was not applicable. Most respondents (60%) in 2012 performed at least 11 procedures per month, whereas most respondents (45%) in 2007 performed 6 to 10 procedures per month (P = 0.005). All respondents at institutions where robotic surgery was used were allowed to operate at the robotic console, and 63% of respondents reported that in robotic-assisted surgery cases when a fellow sat at the robot, the fellow performed more than 50% of the case at the console.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that MIS in gynecologic oncology is here to stay. Fellowship programs should develop a systematic approach to training in MIS and in individual MIS platforms as they become more prevalent. Fellowship programs should also develop and apply an objective assessment of minimum proficiency in MIS to ensure that programs are adequately preparing trainees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document