SEISMIC VELOCITIES FROM SURFACE MEASUREMENTS

Geophysics ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hewitt Dix

The purpose of this paper is to discuss field and interpretive techniques which permit, in favorable cases, the quite accurate determination of seismic interval velocities prior to drilling. A simple but accurate formula is developed for the quick calculation of interval velocities from “average velocities” determined by the known [Formula: see text] technique. To secure accuracy a careful study of multiple reflections is necessary and this is discussed. Although the principal objective in determining velocities is to allow an accurate structural interpretation to be made from seismic reflection data, an important secondary objective is to get some lithological information. This is obtained through a correlation of velocities with rock type and depth.

Geophysics ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max K. Miller

Common‐depth‐point seismic reflection data were generated on a computer using simple ray tracing and analyzed with processing techniques currently used on actual field recordings. Constant velocity layers with curved interfaces were used to simulate complex geologic shapes. Two models were chosen to illustrate problems caused by curved geologic interfaces, i.e., interfaces at depths which vary laterally in a nonlinear fashion and produce large spatial variations in the apparent stacking velocity. A three‐layer model with a deep structure and no weathering was used as a control model. For comparison, a low velocity weathering layer also of variable thickness was inserted near the surface of the control model. The low velocity layer was thicker than the ordinary thin weathering layers where state‐of‐the‐art static correction methods work well. Traveltime, moveout, apparent rms velocities, and interval velocities were calculated for both models. The weathering introduces errors into the rms velocities and traveltimes. A method is described to compensate for these errors. A static correction applied to the traveltimes reduced the fluctuation of apparent rms velocities. Values for the thick weathering layer model were “over corrected” so that synclines (anticlines) replaced false anticlines (synclines) for both near‐surface and deep zones. It is concluded that computer modeling is a useful tool for analyzing specific problems of processing CDP seismic data such as errors in velocity estimates produced by large lateral variations in overburden.


Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. A25-A29
Author(s):  
Lele Zhang

Migration of seismic reflection data leads to artifacts due to the presence of internal multiple reflections. Recent developments have shown that these artifacts can be avoided using Marchenko redatuming or Marchenko multiple elimination. These are powerful concepts, but their implementation comes at a considerable computational cost. We have derived a scheme to image the subsurface of the medium with significantly reduced computational cost and artifacts. This scheme is based on the projected Marchenko equations. The measured reflection response is required as input, and a data set with primary reflections and nonphysical primary reflections is created. Original and retrieved data sets are migrated, and the migration images are multiplied with each other, after which the square root is taken to give the artifact-reduced image. We showed the underlying theory and introduced the effectiveness of this scheme with a 2D numerical example.


Geophysics ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-427
Author(s):  
Tsvi Meidav

Kristjansson and Wright are right in their comment that equations (16) or (17) are correct “only if either point A or B is held fixed and this fixed point is used to define the origin for the problem.” Hence, the suggested approach cannot be used as the general solution for the determination of the dip from seismic reflection data.


Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. J. Hardy ◽  
M. R. Warner ◽  
R. W. Hobbs

The many techniques that have been developed to remove multiple reflections from seismic data all leave remnant energy which can cause ambiguity in interpretation. The removal methods are mostly based on periodicity (e.g., Sinton et al., 1978) or the moveout difference between primary and multiple events (e.g., Schneider et al., 1965). They work on synthetic and selected field data sets but are rather unsatisfactory when applied to high‐amplitude, long‐period multiples in marine seismic reflection data acquired in moderately deep (700 m to 3 km) water. Differential moveout is often better than periodicity at discriminating between types of events because, while a multiple series may look periodic to the eye, it is only exactly so on zero‐offset reflections from horizontal layers. The technique of seismic event labeling described below works by returning offset information from CDP gathers to a stacked section by color coding, thereby discriminating between seismic reflection events by differential normal moveout. Events appear as a superposition of colors; the direction of color fringes indicates whether an event has been overcorrected or undercorrected for its hyperbolic normal moveout.


Geophysics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 903-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. N. Bishop ◽  
K. P. Bube ◽  
R. T. Cutler ◽  
R. T. Langan ◽  
P. L. Love ◽  
...  

Estimation of reflector depth and seismic velocity from seismic reflection data can be formulated as a general inverse problem. The method used to solve this problem is similar to tomographic techniques in medical diagnosis and we refer to it as seismic reflection tomography. Seismic tomography is formulated as an iterative Gauss‐Newton algorithm that produces a velocity‐depth model which minimizes the difference between traveltimes generated by tracing rays through the model and traveltimes measured from the data. The input to the process consists of traveltimes measured from selected events on unstacked seismic data and a first‐guess velocity‐depth model. Usually this first‐guess model has velocities which are laterally constant and is usually based on nearby well information and/or an analysis of the stacked section. The final model generated by the tomographic method yields traveltimes from ray tracing which differ from the measured values in recorded data by approximately 5 ms root‐mean‐square. The indeterminancy of the inversion and the associated nonuniqueness of the output model are both analyzed theoretically and tested numerically. It is found that certain aspects of the velocity field are poorly determined or undetermined. This technique is applied to an example using real data where the presence of permafrost causes a near‐surface lateral change in velocity. The permafrost is successfully imaged in the model output from tomography. In addition, depth estimates at the intersection of two lines differ by a significantly smaller amount than the corresponding estimates derived from conventional processing.


1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Calvert ◽  
R. M. Clowes

Multichannel deep seismic reflection data from the subduction zone of western Canada delineate the wedge of accereted sediments and the principal terranes (Crescent, Pacific Rim, and Wrangellia) that form the convergent margin. The top of the igneous oceanic crust is defined by subhorizontal reflections extending at least 100 km landward of the deformation front. Upon incorporation into the accretionary wedge, the clearly defined stratigraphy of the incoming oceanic sedimentary section is destroyed over a distance of about 10 km. Initially, an unreflective zone, which correlates well with maximum fluid expulsion, is formed. Farther landward, a predominantly landward-dipping reflectivity exists. A number of reflections are thrust faults, which appear to merge at depth with the subhorizontal reflections, but most have another origin. These reflections may be related to the movement of fluids generated by the compaction of sediments or possibly by the dehydration of the subducting plate. They are strongest in a region of depressed seismic velocities beneath the continental slope, where an analysis of reflection amplitude with offset implies that a high Poisson's ratio exists; this is consistent with the presence of elevated pore pressures. Thus, pore pressure variations associated with the migration of fluids may be the cause of much of the reflectivity within the accreted wedge, although the precipitation of minerals from rising fluids could also be important. Evidence from the seismic data also indicates that fluids from the accretionary prism are being expelled into the sediments of the overlying Tofino basin. A number of anomalously strong reflections and disruption of the horizontally stratified sediments within the lower levels of the basin probably represent fluids that migrated upward from the accreted wedge and were trapped against impermeable barriers created through the deposition of sediments on the continental slope and in the basin.


Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. Q53-Q66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost van der Neut ◽  
Matteo Ravasi ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
Ivan Vasconcelos

Seismic reflection data can be redatumed to a specified boundary in the subsurface by solving an inverse (or multidimensional deconvolution) problem. The redatumed data can be interpreted as an extended image of the subsurface at the redatuming boundary, depending on the subsurface offset and time. We retrieve target-enclosed extended images by using two redatuming boundaries, which are selected above and below a specified target volume. As input, we require the upgoing and downgoing wavefields at both redatuming boundaries due to impulsive sources at the earth’s surface. These wavefields can be obtained from actual measurements in the subsurface, they can be numerically modeled, or they can be retrieved by solving a multidimensional Marchenko equation. As output, we retrieved virtual reflection and transmission responses as if sources and receivers were located at the two target-enclosing boundaries. These data contain all orders of reflections inside the target volume but exclude all interactions with the part of the medium outside this volume. The retrieved reflection responses can be used to image the target volume from above or from below. We found that the images from above and below are similar (given that the Marchenko equation is used for wavefield retrieval). If a model with sharp boundaries in the target volume is available, the redatumed data can also be used for two-sided imaging, where the retrieved reflection and transmission responses are exploited. Because multiple reflections are used by this strategy, seismic resolution can be improved significantly. Because target-enclosed extended images are independent on the part of the medium outside the target volume, our methodology is also beneficial to reduce the computational burden of localized inversion, which can now be applied inside the target volume only, without suffering from interactions with other parts of the medium.


Geophysics ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Marr ◽  
Edward F. Zagst

The more recent developments in common‐depth‐point techniques to attenuate multiple reflections have resulted in an exploration capability comparable to the development of the seismic reflection method. The combination of new concepts in digital seismic data processing with CDP techniques is creating unforeseen exploration horizons with vastly improved seismic data. Major improvements in multiple reflection and reverberation attenuation are now attainable with appropriate CDP geometry and special CDP stacking procedures. Further major improvements are clearly evident in the very near future with the use of multichannel digital filtering‐stacking techniques and the application of deconvolution as the first step in seismic data processing. CDP techniques are briefly reviewed and evaluated with real and experimental data. Synthetic data are used to illustrate that all seismic reflection data should be deconvolved as the first processing step.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document