3-D traveltime computation using Huygens wavefront tracing

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 883-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Sava ◽  
Sergey Fomel

Traveltime computation is widely used in seismic modeling, imaging, and velocity analysis. The two most commonly used methods are ray tracing and numerical solutions to the eikonal equation. Eikonal solvers are fast and robust but are limited to computing only the first‐arrival traveltimes. Ray tracing can compute multiple arrivals but lacks the robustness of eikonal solvers. We propose a robust and complete method of traveltime computation. It is based on a system of partial differential equations, which is equivalent to the eikonal equation but formulated in the ray‐coordinates system. We use a first‐order discretization scheme that is interpreted very simply in terms of the Huygens’s principle. Our explicit finite‐difference solution to the eikonal equation solved in the ray‐coordinates system delivers both computational speed and stability since we use more than one point on the current wavefront at every time step. The finite‐difference method has proven to be a robust alternative to conventional ray tracing, while being faster and having a better ability to handle rough velocity media and penetrate shadow zones.

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 682-682
Author(s):  
Fuhao Qin

The Sethian and Popovici paper “3-D traveltime computation using the fast marching method” that appeared in Geophysics, Vol. 64, 516–523, discussed a method to solve the eikonal equation for first arrival traveltimes which was called the “fast marching” method. The method, as the authors demonstrated, is very fast and stable. However, their method is very similar to the method discussed by F. Qin et al. (1992), entitled “Finite difference solution of the eikonal equation along expanding wavefronts,” Geophysics, Vol. 57, 478–487. F. Qin et al. first proposed the “expanding wavefront” method for solving eikonal equation in the 60th Ann. Internat. Mtg. of the SEG in 1990.


Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunhua Cao ◽  
Stewart Greenhalgh

First‐break traveltimes can be accurately computed by the finite‐difference solution of the eikonal equation using a new corner‐node discretization scheme. It offers accuracy advantages over the traditional cell‐centered node scheme. A substantial efficiency improvement is achieved by the incorporation of a wavefront tracking algorithm based on the construction of a minimum traveltime tree. For the traditional discretization scheme, an accurate average value for the local squared slowness is found to be crucial in stabilizing the numerical scheme for models with large slowness contrasts. An improved method based on the traditional discretization scheme can be used to calculate traveltimes in arbitrarily varying velocity models, but the method based on the corner‐node discretization scheme provides a much better solution.


Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 992-992

The domain of applicability of the expressions derived in this paper is stated incorrectly. The second‐last sentence of the section “Derivation of the Field Equations” should read “Using the numerical techniques discussed by Pohanka for circumventing this problem, an expression applicable everywhere in space can be obtained.” The following sentence is incorrect and should be deleted. I thank Dr. Marion Ivan for point this error out to me. After acceptance of the paper, an article covering substantially the same material, though with a somewhat different point of view, appeared. The article is: Pohanka, V., 1998, Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly increasing density: Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 391–404. Were I aware of Dr. Pohanka’s paper, it would of course have been referenced in mine. To: “Finite‐difference solution of the eikonal equation using an efficient, first‐arrival, wavefront tracking scheme” S. Cao and S. Greenhalgh (Geophysics, 59, 635) Equation 8a is in error. The parenthetical expressions on the left should be squared to make it dimensionally correct.


Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1270-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Le‐Wei Mo ◽  
Jerry M. Harris

Traveltimes of direct arrivals are obtained by solving the eikonal equation using finite differences. A uniform square grid represents both the velocity model and the traveltime table. Wavefront discontinuities across a velocity interface at postcritical incidence and some insights in direct‐arrival ray tracing are incorporated into the traveltime computation so that the procedure is stable at precritical, critical, and postcritical incidence angles. The traveltimes can be used in Kirchhoff migration, tomography, and NMO corrections that require traveltimes of direct arrivals on a uniform grid.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaojie Li ◽  
Zhoushun Zheng ◽  
Shuang Wang ◽  
Jiankang Liu

An explicit finite difference scheme for one-dimensional Burgers equation is derived from the lattice Boltzmann method. The system of the lattice Boltzmann equations for the distribution of the fictitious particles is rewritten as a three-level finite difference equation. The scheme is monotonic and satisfies maximum value principle; therefore, the stability is proved. Numerical solutions have been compared with the exact solutions reported in previous studies. TheL2, L∞and Root-Mean-Square (RMS) errors in the solutions show that the scheme is accurate and effective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document