Automatic and simultaneous migration velocity analysis and waveform inversion of real data using a MBTT/WKB J formulation

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene‐Edouard Plessix ◽  
Yann‐Herve' De Roeck ◽  
Guy Chavent
Keyword(s):  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis

scholarly journals Automatic wave-equation migration velocity analysis by focusing subsurface virtual sources

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. U1-U8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbing Sun ◽  
Tariq Alkhalifah
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Band Limited

Macro-velocity model building is important for subsequent prestack depth migration and full-waveform inversion. Wave-equation migration velocity analysis uses the band-limited waveform to invert for velocity. Normally, inversion would be implemented by focusing the subsurface offset common-image gathers. We reexamine this concept with a different perspective: In the subsurface offset domain, using extended Born modeling, the recorded data can be considered as invariant with respect to the perturbation of the position of the virtual sources and velocity at the same time. A linear system connecting the perturbation of the position of those virtual sources and velocity is derived and solved subsequently by the conjugate gradient method. In theory, the perturbation of the position of the virtual sources is given by the Rytov approximation. Thus, compared with the Born approximation, it relaxes the dependency on amplitude and makes the proposed method more applicable for real data. We determined the effectiveness of the approach by applying the proposed method on isotropic and anisotropic vertical transverse isotropic synthetic data. A real data set example verifies the robustness of the proposed method.

Migration velocity analysis based on focusing diffractions generated using the CRS wavefront attributes: Application to real land data

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-50
Author(s):  
German Garabito ◽  
José Silas dos Santos Silva ◽  
Williams Lima
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Normal Incidence ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
The Time Domain

In land seismic data processing, the prestack time migration (PSTM) image remains the standard imaging output, but a reliable migrated image of the subsurface depends on the accuracy of the migration velocity model. We have adopted two new algorithms for time-domain migration velocity analysis based on wavefield attributes of the common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack method. These attributes, extracted from multicoverage data, were successfully applied to build the velocity model in the depth domain through tomographic inversion of the normal-incidence-point (NIP) wave. However, there is no practical and reliable method for determining an accurate and geologically consistent time-migration velocity model from these CRS attributes. We introduce an interactive method to determine the migration velocity model in the time domain based on the application of NIP wave attributes and the CRS stacking operator for diffractions, to generate synthetic diffractions on the reflection events of the zero-offset (ZO) CRS stacked section. In the ZO data with diffractions, the poststack time migration (post-STM) is applied with a set of constant velocities, and the migration velocities are then selected through a focusing analysis of the simulated diffractions. We also introduce an algorithm to automatically calculate the migration velocity model from the CRS attributes picked for the main reflection events in the ZO data. We determine the precision of our diffraction focusing velocity analysis and the automatic velocity calculation algorithms using two synthetic models. We also applied them to real 2D land data with low quality and low fold to estimate the time-domain migration velocity model. The velocity models obtained through our methods were validated by applying them in the Kirchhoff PSTM of real data, in which the velocity model from the diffraction focusing analysis provided significant improvements in the quality of the migrated image compared to the legacy image and to the migrated image obtained using the automatically calculated velocity model.

Migration velocity analysis from locally coherent events in 2‐D laterally heterogeneous media, Part II: Applications on synthetic and real data

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1213-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Chauris ◽  
Mark S. Noble ◽  
Gilles Lambaré ◽  
Pascal Podvin
Keyword(s):  
Heterogeneous Media ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Efficient Computation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Paraxial Ray

We demonstrate a method for estimating 2‐D velocity models from synthetic and real seismic reflection data in the framework of migration velocity analysis (MVA). No assumption is required on the reflector geometry or on the unknown background velocity field, provided that the data only contain primary reflections/diffractions. In the prestack depth‐migrated volume, locations where the reflectivity exhibits local coherency are automatically picked without interpretation in two panels: common image gathers (CIGs) and common offset gathers (COGs). They are characterized by both their positions and two slopes. The velocity is estimated by minimizing all slopes picked in the CIGs. We test the applicability of the method on a real data set, showing the possibility of an efficient inversion using (1) the migration of selected CIGs and COGs, (2) automatic picking on prior uncorrelated locally coherent events, (3) efficient computation of the gradient of the cost function via paraxial ray tracing from the picked events to the surface, and (4) a gradient‐type optimization algorithm for convergence.

Angle‐domain common‐image gathers for migration velocity analysis by wavefield‐continuation imaging

Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1283-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biondo Biondi ◽  
William W. Symes
Keyword(s):  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Image Point ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Data Set ◽  
The North ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Wavefield Continuation

We analyze the kinematic properties of offset‐domain common image gathers (CIGs) and angle‐domain CIGs (ADCIGs) computed by wavefield‐continuation migration. Our results are valid regardless of whether the CIGs were obtained by using the correct migration velocity. They thus can be used as a theoretical basis for developing migration velocity analysis (MVA) methods that exploit the velocity information contained in ADCIGs. We demonstrate that in an ADCIG cube, the image point lies on the normal to the apparent reflector dip that passes through the point where the source ray intersects the receiver ray. The image‐point position on the normal depends on the velocity error; when the velocity is correct, the image point coincides with the point where the source ray intersects the receiver ray. Starting from this geometric result, we derive an analytical expression for the expected movements of the image points in ADCIGs as functions of the traveltime perturbation caused by velocity errors. By applying this analytical result and assuming stationary raypaths (i.e., small velocity errors), we then derive two expressions for the residual moveout (RMO) function in ADCIGs. We verify our theoretical results and test the accuracy of the proposed RMO functions by analyzing the migration results of a synthetic data set with a wide range of reflector dips. Our kinematic analysis leads also to the development of a new method for computing ADCIGs when significant geological dips cause strong artifacts in the ADCIGs computed by conventional methods. The proposed method is based on the computation of offset‐domain CIGs along the vertical‐offset axis and on the “optimal” combination of these new CIGs with conventional CIGs. We demonstrate the need for and the advantages of the proposed method on a real data set acquired in the North Sea.

Multidip tomography formulation for migration velocity analysis

Geophysics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. U1-U12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raanan Dafni ◽  
Moshe Reshef
Keyword(s):  
Imaging System ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Equation System ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Opening Angle ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Seismic Image ◽  
Dip Angle

We have developed a new approach for migration velocity analysis by ray-based reflection tomography, formulated according to more than a single dip direction. It is suggested to use a summation-free subsurface imaging system in the angle domain for generating multiparameter common image gathers through depth migration. Each gather associated with this system comprised dip-dependent opening-angle images contributed from the prestack data. Independent moveout information, coming from either a specular or nonspecular dip direction, was extracted inside these gathers to allow the entire scattered field to be involved in the velocity model optimization. By obeying the linear tomographic principle, a multidip tomography system was set to include imaging errors from specular and nonspecular directions. The updated velocity model was reconstructed by a least-squares inverse solution of the multidip tomographic equation system. Providing additional moveout from the migration’s dip, other than the specular one, was believed to be essential because the seismic data were misplaced in the image space while applying depth imaging by an erroneous velocity model. It might make the determination of a clear specular orientation, usually from the seismic image itself, misleading or ambiguous. The conversion of depth moveout into traveltime error along nonspecular rays was done according to an analytic mechanism, derived in the angle domain. The proposed analysis of migration errors by a multiple dip-angle orientation is demonstrated via the multidip tomography formulation by 2D synthetic and real data examples. It seems to be more efficient, as accurate and reliable as the conventional analysis, and to be better able to determine the ill-posed conditioning of the tomographic inversion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document